SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2609.06327

Query-Oblivious Coresets for Softmax Attention: Improved Bounds and Efficient Constructions

Abstract

A query-oblivious coreset for a softmax-attention head is a subset $S$ of the key--value pairs such that attention computed from $S$ alone is within $\varepsilon$ of the full output, in $\ell_2$, simultaneously for every query in a ball. Liberty, Andoni and Kleiner proved that unweighted coresets of size $O(\sqrt d\,e^{\rho+\frac12\log\rho+o(\log\log\rho)}/\varepsilon)$ exist, $\rho$ being the query radius times the centred key radius, against a lower bound $\Omega(\sqrt d\,e^{\rho}/\varepsilon)$, and conjectured that closing the gap needs new techniques. We show it does not. A spherical lift of both balls into one exponential-kernel instance lets the chaining bound of Bozzai and Rothvoss apply directly, and Chevet's inequality splits key from value dimension: unweighted coresets of size $O(e^{\rho}(\sqrt{d_v}+\sqrt{d_k\log(1+\rho)})/\varepsilon)$ exist and are computable in randomised polynomial time, the first with a whole-ball guarantee at the existential size up to $\sqrt{\log(1+\rho)}$. A dimension-free sampling cap $O(e^{2\rho}/\varepsilon^{2})$ completes the envelope. In fixed dimension the logarithm disappears: completing the key ball to a sphere makes the kernel an unweighted Gaussian one, so Tai's diameter-free bound gives $O_{d_k,d_v}(e^{\rho}/\varepsilon)$, ruling out a matching logarithmic lower bound there and answering the Gaussian-restriction case of a question of Bozzai and Rothvoss for the exponential and Hellinger kernels. We restate the Liberty--Andoni--Kleiner bound in the centred convention with a full proof, and show that the one-way communication bounds of Chen et al.\ transfer to query-oblivious coresets, where for $\varepsilon\ll e^{-\rho}$ they are the strongest floors known. The dimensional factor is the price of one signing for all queries: for a single query the discrepancy is $O(e^{\rho})$, dimension-free.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Ofek I. Cohen. 2026-09-06. Query-Oblivious Coresets for Softmax Attention: Improved Bounds and Efficient Constructions. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.06327

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS