SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2609.06464

Minimization Prophet Inequality with Bounded Costs

Abstract

We study the cost-minimization prophet inequality problem, in which a decision-maker sequentially observes $n$ independent and identically distributed (IID) random variables. After each observation, the decision-maker must either accept the current realization and stop, or reject it and continue with the next variable. The goal is to minimize the selected value. Unlike the classical maximization setting, if none of the first $n-1$ values is accepted, the final realization must be selected. Esfandiari et al. (SIDMA 2017) showed that this problem does not admit constant-competitive online algorithms in general, which motivates subsequent work on restricted distribution classes, such as entire distributions (Livanos and Mehta, SODA 2024) and distributions with bounded extreme values (Livanos and Mehta, EC 2025). In this work, we focus on distributions with bounded support. For distributions supported on $[1,b]$, we characterize the competitive ratio of online algorithms as a function of both $b$ and $n$. We consider both distribution-aware and distribution-oblivious settings. In the distribution-aware case, we provide a nearly tight characterization of the optimal online algorithm, showing that its competitive ratio is at most $b^{(1-1/n)^n}$ for all $n\geq 2$. More significantly, we design a distribution-oblivious algorithm that achieves the same guarantee, with a sequence of predetermined thresholds that depend only on $b$ and $n$. Furthermore, we extend our analysis to the non-IID setting, where we show that a simple single-threshold algorithm attains an asymptotically optimal competitive ratio of $\Theta(\sqrt{b})$.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Haolong Li, Xiaowei Wu. 2026-09-06. Minimization Prophet Inequality with Bounded Costs. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.06464

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS