RedKnot-MLA: Multi-Head Offline-Online Reuse for DeepSeek-V4 Long-Context Serving

Yang Liu; Zhaokai Luo; Huayi Jin; Ruozhou He; Chenchen Hong; Mingxiao Ma; Biao Zhang; Zhiyong Wang; Boyu Wang; Guanjie Chen; Yifei Liu; Tao Xie; Junhao Hu

arXiv · 2609.07008

RedKnot-MLA: Multi-Head Offline-Online Reuse for DeepSeek-V4 Long-Context Serving

Yang Liu·Zhaokai Luo·Huayi Jin·Ruozhou He·Chenchen Hong·Mingxiao Ma·Biao Zhang·Zhiyong Wang·Boyu Wang·Guanjie Chen·Yifei Liu·Tao Xie·Junhao Hu

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Multi-head latent attention (MLA) exposes many logical query heads through one packed latent KV stream. This representation is memory efficient, but it removes the physical per-head cache boundary assumed by conventional head-wise reuse. We present our system, a DeepSeek-V4 realization of RedKnot's head-aware reuse principle. Each immutable document is processed offline at canonical position zero; certified Local-head contributions are retained as MLA-Off. At serving time, query-side RoPE relocation restores the document's request position, a small Global-head set and protected Local token rows are recomputed as MLA-Online, and the two paths are merged before a single shared output projection. The packed MLA latent is never split. DeepSeek-V4-Flash uses 37 reusable layers and a 56/8 Local/Global partition, giving a 75.29% analytic logical head-row ceiling; the Pro-0813 profile uses 55 layers and 112/16 heads, giving 78.89%. Frozen Flash operating points show hot-artifact TTFT speedups of 2.02-3.84x. At 256K, the archived three-dataset study reports an aggregate F1 change of +3.24 percentage points, an EM change of +4.16 points, and a 78.7-79.5% analytic major-operator arithmetic saving, while one dataset decreases by 2.81 F1 points. A separate author-reported 256K hot-artifact QPS measurement is approximately 2.0x; because its raw concurrency trace is not included in this bundle, we mark it as preliminary rather than archived evidence. We describe the factorization, position repair, token-row closure, sparse-MoE support, TP8 integration, and the measurement boundaries needed to interpret these results.

Explore related subjects

cs.AI

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Yang Liu, Zhaokai Luo, Huayi Jin, Ruozhou He, Chenchen Hong, Mingxiao Ma, Biao Zhang, Zhiyong Wang, Boyu Wang, Guanjie Chen, Yifei Liu, Tao Xie, Junhao Hu. 2026-09-07. RedKnot-MLA: Multi-Head Offline-Online Reuse for DeepSeek-V4 Long-Context Serving. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.07008

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

cs.AI subject

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Decoupling Readiness from Release for Tail-Aware Scheduling of Agentic LLM Workflows

Agentic LLM workflows consist of sequences of model turns interleaved with tool interactions, so their end-to-end completion time depends not only on inference speed but also on when ready turns are released. Most runtimes release each turn immediately upon readiness. Under contention, this eager release policy can accumulate released but unfinished work; once submitted, those turns can no longer be reordered by the workflow-level policy, increasing tail latency. We present a tail-risk-aware turn release scheduling method that jointly decides which ready turn to release next and how much released but unfinished work to maintain. The method uses a mean--Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) objective to capture the evolving tail risk of unfinished workflows, incorporates online estimates of turn work when prioritizing ready turns, and adapts the released work budget to observed queue pressure. We evaluate the method using real agent execution traces from software engineering tasks across multiple LLMs and workflow arrival rates. The method performs comparably to eager release under light load and substantially reduces the P95 of workflow flow time under contention, achieving up to a \(3.50\times\) speedup.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

Demystifying the Privacy-Utility Trade-off in LLM Interactions

The integration of Large Language Models into daily tasks relies on context-rich instructions, inevitably exposing sensitive user information. Current privacy-preserving methods typically employ context-agnostic static rules, causing severe utility degradation. However, the specific mechanisms governing how sanitization impacts downstream performance remain largely underexplored. To address this, we conduct a systematic analysis to deconstruct the privacy-utility trade-off, uncovering three underlying mechanisms: (1) Context-Dependent Utility, which first establishes when to sanitize by revealing that data value shifts from critical constraints to dispensable noise based on user intent; (2) Strategic Adaptation, which subsequently determines how to sanitize by dictating that the choice between removal and replacement depends on the task's reliance on factual integrity versus structural coherence; and (3) Combinatorial Interplay, which finally extends the protection scope by demonstrating that attributes form a semantic web of synergistic dependencies or antagonistic redundancies. Guided by these insights, we introduce an intent-driven local protection framework. By distilling a lightweight model Veilmind-4B to drive a dynamic extraction-sanitization-restoration pipeline, our approach reaches a low-leakage privacy point while preserving substantially higher response utility than existing privacy-oriented baselines, advancing the privacy-utility trade-off toward the Pareto frontier.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

Defining AI Agents: A Compendium of Criteria, Metrics, and Benchmarks

The term agent in artificial intelligence lacks a standard definition, complicating the evaluation, comparison, and reproducibility of AI agent research. We address this ambiguity through a survey organized around five dimensions of agenticness: environmental interaction, learning and adaptation, autonomy, goal-directed behavior, and temporal coherence. For each dimension, we examine how the underlying capability has been conceptualized across prior work and synthesize the metrics, benchmarks, and evaluation frameworks used to assess it. This review provides a structured account of the current landscape of agent evaluation, highlighting both established approaches and areas where evaluation remains limited or inconsistent. We additionally introduce the Agent Compendium, a public-facing digital resource that organizes and extends the evaluation methods identified through this review. Together, the survey and compendium provide a common structure for evaluating and comparing agent capabilities across AI systems, supporting more reproducible research, clearer communication, and more systematic study of artificial agents.

cs.AI↗