SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2609.07222

Distance-Aware Attention and Wall-Distance Expert Routing for Transformer-Based 3D Flow Prediction

Abstract

Transformer surrogates for 3D flow prediction compress an industrial mesh into a small set of tokens from which every prediction point reads. Two operations follow: the retrieval step in which a point gathers information from the compressed representation, and the feed-forward layer that transforms what it retrieved. In current backbones both are blind to where the point sits in the flow. We condition both on wall-related physical signals. Distance-aware cross-attention (DA-CA) reshapes each volume query by its wall distance before retrieval, so that a point deep in the boundary layer draws different geometric information than one in the outer flow. Surface-volume mixture-of-experts (SVMoE) replaces the shared feed-forward layer with a small set of experts, routed by wall distance for volume points and by local geometry for surface points. Neither mechanism is tied to one architecture, so we apply both unchanged to AB-UPT and Transolver-3. On DrivAerML with 50 training cases, DA-CA reduces the volume pressure error by 10.1%, and DA-CA and SVMoE together reduce it by 12.5%; DA-CA improves the near-wall region at some cost in the far region, which SVMoE recovers, and the volume experts settle into near-wall, transition, and free-stream bands without routing supervision. Retrained on 300 cases, the conditioning improves every field quantity, reducing volume pressure and velocity errors by 33.1% and 18.6% on AB-UPT and by 21.4% and 21.3% on Transolver-3. Under Leave-One-Body-Out evaluation on DrivAerNet++, it reduces the volume pressure error on unseen body types by up to 14.2%.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Sanghyeon Kim, Sunwoong Yang, Namwoo Kang. 2026-09-07. Distance-Aware Attention and Wall-Distance Expert Routing for Transformer-Based 3D Flow Prediction. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.07222

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Decoupling Readiness from Release for Tail-Aware Scheduling of Agentic LLM Workflows

Agentic LLM workflows consist of sequences of model turns interleaved with tool interactions, so their end-to-end completion time depends not only on inference speed but also on when ready turns are released. Most runtimes release each turn immediately upon readiness. Under contention, this eager release policy can accumulate released but unfinished work; once submitted, those turns can no longer be reordered by the workflow-level policy, increasing tail latency. We present a tail-risk-aware turn release scheduling method that jointly decides which ready turn to release next and how much released but unfinished work to maintain. The method uses a mean--Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) objective to capture the evolving tail risk of unfinished workflows, incorporates online estimates of turn work when prioritizing ready turns, and adapts the released work budget to observed queue pressure. We evaluate the method using real agent execution traces from software engineering tasks across multiple LLMs and workflow arrival rates. The method performs comparably to eager release under light load and substantially reduces the P95 of workflow flow time under contention, achieving up to a \(3.50\times\) speedup.

cs.AI

Demystifying the Privacy-Utility Trade-off in LLM Interactions

The integration of Large Language Models into daily tasks relies on context-rich instructions, inevitably exposing sensitive user information. Current privacy-preserving methods typically employ context-agnostic static rules, causing severe utility degradation. However, the specific mechanisms governing how sanitization impacts downstream performance remain largely underexplored. To address this, we conduct a systematic analysis to deconstruct the privacy-utility trade-off, uncovering three underlying mechanisms: (1) Context-Dependent Utility, which first establishes when to sanitize by revealing that data value shifts from critical constraints to dispensable noise based on user intent; (2) Strategic Adaptation, which subsequently determines how to sanitize by dictating that the choice between removal and replacement depends on the task's reliance on factual integrity versus structural coherence; and (3) Combinatorial Interplay, which finally extends the protection scope by demonstrating that attributes form a semantic web of synergistic dependencies or antagonistic redundancies. Guided by these insights, we introduce an intent-driven local protection framework. By distilling a lightweight model Veilmind-4B to drive a dynamic extraction-sanitization-restoration pipeline, our approach reaches a low-leakage privacy point while preserving substantially higher response utility than existing privacy-oriented baselines, advancing the privacy-utility trade-off toward the Pareto frontier.

cs.AI

Defining AI Agents: A Compendium of Criteria, Metrics, and Benchmarks

The term agent in artificial intelligence lacks a standard definition, complicating the evaluation, comparison, and reproducibility of AI agent research. We address this ambiguity through a survey organized around five dimensions of agenticness: environmental interaction, learning and adaptation, autonomy, goal-directed behavior, and temporal coherence. For each dimension, we examine how the underlying capability has been conceptualized across prior work and synthesize the metrics, benchmarks, and evaluation frameworks used to assess it. This review provides a structured account of the current landscape of agent evaluation, highlighting both established approaches and areas where evaluation remains limited or inconsistent. We additionally introduce the Agent Compendium, a public-facing digital resource that organizes and extends the evaluation methods identified through this review. Together, the survey and compendium provide a common structure for evaluating and comparing agent capabilities across AI systems, supporting more reproducible research, clearer communication, and more systematic study of artificial agents.

cs.AI