arXiv · 2609.12766
A Historical Corpus Is Not a Historical System: Auditing Hindsight Leakage in Stateful Data Discovery
Abstract
Offline replay should estimate what a discovery system could retrieve at a historical point, yet freezing the corpus leaves interaction memory unconstrained. We formalize point-in-time (PIT) discovery through historical state $(D_t, θ_t, M_{< i})$ and introduce a paired replay that changes only memory availability. The protocol constructs PIT and full-stream Future views from behavior-only traces and audits selected entries with a Temporal Violation Rate. Across three table-text domains, two stream regimes, two retrievers, and five seeds (216,000 rows), Future inflated Asset Recall@100 by 2.62-5.24 points; all 12 paired intervals excluded zero. With behavior-only trace memory, PIT underperformed the no-memory Stateless condition; Future masked 32.7-48.4% of that harm. For a simulated positive-feedback cache, PIT added 4.65-18.96 points over Stateless while Future added another 4.11-9.58 points. On five timestamped FreshStack topics, Future exceeded PIT by 2.72 points [1.75, 3.71]. Historical evaluation must version and validate memory with the corpus.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Yixi Zhou, Fan Zhang, Sikun Wang, Yingfan Xu, Haipeng Zhang. 2026-09-11. A Historical Corpus Is Not a Historical System: Auditing Hindsight Leakage in Stateful Data Discovery. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.12766
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.