Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2609.13233

EMCStereo: Attention-Enhanced Stereo Matching for Thin-Structure Depth Estimation with a Synthetic Tree-Branch Benchmark

Yida Lin·Bing Xue·Mengjie Zhang·Sam Schofield·Richard Green
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Thin structures such as tree branches are among the hardest cases for stereo matching: a branch is only a few pixels wide, the background is cluttered, and dense ground truth for real branches is nearly impossible to label by hand. We make three contributions. First, EMCStereo integrates three lightweight attention modules into a PSMNet-style cost-volume backbone: Efficient Multi-scale Attention (EMA) on deep semantic features, a Multi-Scale Fusion block (MSFblock) learning spatial pyramid weights instead of concatenating them, and Coordinate Attention (CoordAtt) on final matching features. Because MSFblock collapses four pyramid branches into one, the modules leave the network 2.0% smaller and add only 1.7% inference time overhead. Second, VirtualTree is a synthetic stereo dataset rendered in Unreal Engine 5 with a simulated ZED Mini rig, providing 5,520 pairs with exact disparity for thin branches. Third, an eight-way ablation establishes a run-to-run noise floor of 0.009 px end-point error (EPE). EMCStereo achieves 1.31 px EPE (5.96% D1-all) on the VirtualTree test split, 1.00 px on SceneFlow, and 0.80, 0.73, 0.62, and 3.19 px on KITTI 2012, KITTI 2015, ETH3D, and Middlebury, with depth accuracy delta_1 from 92.6% to 98.7%. Evaluated against the noise floor, the attention stack is accuracy-neutral at a 100-epoch budget, while MSFblock and CoordAtt cost 0.03-0.05 px unless EMA is present.

Explore related subjects

cs.CV

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Yida Lin, Bing Xue, Mengjie Zhang, Sam Schofield, Richard Green. 2026-09-02. EMCStereo: Attention-Enhanced Stereo Matching for Thin-Structure Depth Estimation with a Synthetic Tree-Branch Benchmark. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.13233

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Privacy Leakage on DNNs: A Survey of Model Inversion Attacks and Defenses

Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) have revolutionized various domains with their exceptional performance across numerous applications. However, Model Inversion (MI) attacks, which disclose private information about the training dataset by abusing access to the trained models, have emerged as a formidable privacy threat. Given a trained network, these attacks enable adversaries to reconstruct high-fidelity data that closely aligns with the private training samples, posing significant privacy concerns. Despite the rapid advances in the field, we lack a comprehensive and systematic overview of existing MI attacks and defenses. To fill this gap, this paper thoroughly investigates this realm and presents a holistic survey. Firstly, our work briefly reviews early MI studies on traditional machine learning scenarios. We then elaborately analyze and compare numerous recent attacks and defenses on Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) across multiple modalities and learning tasks. By meticulously analyzing their distinctive features, we summarize and classify these methods into different categories and provide a novel taxonomy. Finally, this paper discusses promising research directions and presents potential solutions to open issues. To facilitate further study on MI attacks and defenses, we have implemented an open-source model inversion toolbox on GitHub (https://github.com/ffhibnese/Model-Inversion-Attack-ToolBox).

cs.CV↗
arXiv2026

ALINA: Advanced Line Identification and Notation Algorithm

Labels are the cornerstone of supervised machine learning algorithms. Most visual recognition methods are fully supervised, using bounding boxes or pixel-wise segmentations for object localization. Traditional labeling methods, such as crowd-sourcing, are prohibitive due to cost, data privacy, amount of time, and potential errors on large datasets. To address these issues, we propose a novel annotation framework, Advanced Line Identification and Notation Algorithm (ALINA), which can be used for labeling taxiway datasets that consist of different camera perspectives and variable weather attributes (sunny and cloudy). Additionally, the CIRCular threshoLd pixEl Discovery And Traversal (CIRCLEDAT) algorithm has been proposed, which is an integral step in determining the pixels corresponding to taxiway line markings. Once the pixels are identified, ALINA generates corresponding pixel coordinate annotations on the frame. Using this approach, 60,249 frames from the taxiway dataset, AssistTaxi have been labeled. To evaluate the performance, a context-based edge map (CBEM) set was generated manually based on edge features and connectivity. The detection rate after testing the annotated labels with the CBEM set was recorded as 98.45%, attesting its dependability and effectiveness.

cs.CV↗
arXiv2026

DisasterInsight: A Building-Centric Benchmark for Evaluating Vision--Language Models in Disaster Response

Vision--language models (VLMs) show promise for disaster-response remote sensing, but existing benchmarks mainly emphasize scene-level or damage-centric assessment. To study this building-centric gap, we introduce \method{}, a diagnostic benchmark built on xBD, a pre/post-disaster satellite dataset with building-level damage labels. \method{} enriches building instances with OpenStreetMap-derived functional labels and contains 134{,}108 task-specific instruction records across 15 task types, spanning instance-level assessment, scene-level counting, multi-instance reasoning, and structured report generation. The benchmark supports RGB pre/post-disaster imagery, single- and multi-view instance formulations, and scene-level RGB/SAR diagnostic inputs. Experiments with general-domain and remote-sensing VLMs show that models perform better on visible damage cues than on building-function understanding, multi-instance reasoning, counting, and grounded reporting. Instruction tuning improves performance on several tasks but does not close this building-centric gap.

cs.CV↗