Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2609.13548

AutoTailor: Automatic, User-Aligned Capability Selection and Adaptation for Web Agents

Xinyun Cao·Adriana Szekeres·Fazle Elahi Faisal
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Web agents can utilize reusable tools to reduce the cost and latency of low-level browser interaction, but automatically discovered tool collections can be large, redundant, and poorly aligned with user demand. We present AutoTailor, a meta-agentic framework for constructing and maintaining a compact set of trajectory-derived Model Context Protocol (MCP) APIs. Offline, AutoTailor converts web trajectories into parameterized browser-automation programs, applies a Quality Filter to remove APIs with unsuitable granularity and redundant functionality, and applies a Usage Likelihood Filter to prioritize broadly useful capabilities while preserving semantic coverage. Online, Dynamic Reselection monitors task outcomes and API usage, identifies recurring coverage gaps, adds relevant candidates, and prunes persistently unused capabilities. We evaluate AutoTailor on 106 WebArena Postmill tasks. Offline filtering reduces the initial 1,283 unrefined APIs to 87, and Dynamic Reselection produces a 33-API set. With reasoning and acting (ReAct) fallback, this set achieves 90.6% correctness, compared with 87.5% for ReAct alone, while reducing average total request-token cost by 57.8% and latency by 29.4%. Without ReAct, it achieves 60.1% correctness, marginally matching the performance of unrefined set, while reducing request-token usage by 94.9%. Together, these results show that static filtering produces a compact inventory of APIs expected to support core, high-likelihood tasks, while dynamic reselection further tailors that inventory to observed user needs. This combination improves accuracy and latency while sharply reducing token usage and end-to-end cost, demonstrating the value of user-aligned capability management for efficient web agents.

Explore related subjects

cs.AIcs.SE

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Xinyun Cao, Adriana Szekeres, Fazle Elahi Faisal. 2026-09-11. AutoTailor: Automatic, User-Aligned Capability Selection and Adaptation for Web Agents. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.13548

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Memory-Free Continual Learning with Null Space Adaptation for Zero-Shot Vision-Language Models

Pre-trained vision-language models (VLMs), such as CLIP, have demonstrated remarkable zero-shot generalization, enabling deployment in a wide range of real-world tasks without additional task-specific training. However, in real deployment scenarios with evolving environments or emerging classes, these models inevitably face distributional shifts and novel tasks. In such contexts, static zero-shot capabilities are insufficient, and there is a growing need for continual learning methods that allow models to adapt over time while avoiding catastrophic forgetting. We introduce NuSA-CL (Null Space Adaptation for Continual Learning), a lightweight memory-free continual learning framework designed to address this challenge. NuSA-CL employs low-rank adaptation and constrains task-specific weight updates to lie within an approximate null space of the model's current parameters. This strategy minimizes interference with previously acquired knowledge, effectively preserving the zero-shot capabilities of the original model. Unlike methods relying on replay buffers or costly distillation, NuSA-CL imposes minimal computational and memory overhead, making it practical for deployment in resource-constrained, real-world continual learning environments. Experiments show that our framework not only effectively preserves zero-shot transfer capabilities but also achieves highly competitive performance on continual learning benchmarks. These results position NuSA-CL as a practical and scalable solution for continually evolving zero-shot VLMs in real-world applications.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

VeRA: Renewing Reasoning Benchmarks with Executable Specifications

Reasoning benchmarks need renewal along two axes: freshness and headroom. VeRA makes both executable and auditable by turning each item into a task family: a natural-language template, an input generator, and a deterministic answer program. VeRA-E draws fresh instances within a family; VeRA-H modifies the family toward harder tasks; and VeRA-H Pro selects one judge-ranked candidate from up to five validated proposals per seed. Execution checks, seed anchoring, answer discrimination, and independent human solving validate specifications and items. Accepted programs generate further labeled instances through local computation. Across 16 models, AIME-2024 accuracy decreases from 84.46% on seeds to 70.25% on VeRA-E variants, exposing a gap between fixed-item success and fresh-instance robustness. On AIME-2024-II, the human-audited VeRA-H Pro release lowers accuracy from 84.91% to 58.57%. Across the three hardening sources, H Pro has lower mean accuracy than H. On AMO-Bench, both releases average higher accuracy than the seeds under the evaluated budget. Initial auditing accepts 75.4% of hardened candidates; targeted repair raises usable yield to 95.1%. Executable families thus support repeatable benchmark renewal, with validation improving task quality and selection shaping the delivered challenge.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

When can we trust untrusted monitoring? A safety case sketch across collusion strategies

AIs are increasingly being deployed with greater autonomy and capabilities, which increases the risk that a misaligned AI may be able to cause catastrophic harm. Untrusted monitoring -- using one untrusted model to oversee another -- is one approach to reducing risk. Justifying the safety of an untrusted monitoring deployment is challenging because developers cannot safely deploy a misaligned model to test their protocol directly. In this paper, we develop upon existing methods for rigorously demonstrating safety based on pre-deployment testing. We relax assumptions that previous AI control research made about the collusion strategies a misaligned AI might use to subvert untrusted monitoring. We develop a taxonomy covering passive self-recognition, causal collusion (hiding pre-shared signals), acausal collusion (hiding signals via Schelling points), and combined strategies. We create a safety case sketch to clearly present our argument, explicitly state our assumptions, and highlight unsolved challenges. We identify conditions under which passive self-recognition could be a more effective collusion strategy than those studied previously. Our work builds towards more robust evaluations of untrusted monitoring.

cs.AI↗