SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2609.20281

Contextual Fraction Beyond Satisfiability: Pure NAE Completeness, Exact Orbit Packings, and Width Barriers

Abstract

The contextual fraction measures how much globally consistent probability can be packed beneath prescribed local event probabilities. We study the quantitative regime in which supported global assignments exist but the contextual fraction is nontrivial. For balanced relational lifts, we identify the noncontextual fraction with a capacity-constrained packing of global homomorphisms and prove an exact orbit-capacity quotient under finite group symmetries. For the uniform Boolean relation $\NAE_3$, this becomes a minority-position congestion game on proper hypergraph two-colourings: \[ \NCF(e_H)=\frac{1}{3β(H)}. \] We also obtain a minimax dual, a cut-polytope formulation, and explicit values $2/3$ and $1/2$. For exact hardness, we map a graph $G$ to an always-two-colourable anchor hypergraph $A(G)$ with \[ \NCF(e_{A(G)})=1 \Longleftrightarrow χ_f(G)\le3. \] We prove quantitative stability in terms of $χ_f(G)$ and construct a six-edge pure-$\NAE_3$ equality gadget that preserves the full noncontextual fraction under bounded-occurrence compilation. Thus deciding $\CF=0$ is NP-complete for simple $3$-uniform hypergraphs of maximum degree seven, even with a supplied proper two-colouring. We further prove \[ \NCF(\widehat e^{\,\vartheta}) =\vartheta+(1-\vartheta)\NCF(e). \] This yields NP-hardness of distinguishing $\NCF=1/2$ from $\NCF\ge2/3$ on an always-satisfiable fixed five-ary switch template, and additive hardness below $1/12$. A gated colouring construction gives hardness within $1/2-\varepsilon$ for every $\varepsilon>0$. Finally, bounded-treewidth instances admit exact compact extended formulations, while explicit families have extension complexity $2^{Ω(\sqrt N)}$ via cut-polytope projections.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Ronald Katende. 2026-07-29. Contextual Fraction Beyond Satisfiability: Pure NAE Completeness, Exact Orbit Packings, and Width Barriers. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.20281

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Bit-counting complexity classes

We define bit-counting complexity classes whose membership depends on the binary profile of the number of accepting paths of non-deterministic polynomial time Turing machines. We study the relationship between this new family of complexity classes and the classical complexity classes. We prove that the complexity class ${\bf PP}$ is contained in our comparison based bit-counting complexity classes ${\bf B_{|0|=|1|}P}$, ${\bf B_{|0|<|1|}P}$ and ${\bf B_{|0|>|1|}P}$. We then show that the comparison based bit-counting complexity classes and the complexity class ${\bf PP}$ are Turing equivalent, that is ${\bf P}^{\bf PP} = {\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|0|=|1|}P}}={\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|0|>|1|}P}}={\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|0|<|1|}P}}$. We then prove that the complexity classes ${\bf NP}$ and ${\bf CoNP}$ are contained in both of our parity based bit-counting complexity classes ${\bf B_{|0| \oplus}P}$ and ${\bf B_{|1| \oplus}P}$. We also show that the Turing closures of the parity based bit-counting complexity classes coincide, that is ${\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|0|\oplus}P}}={\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|1|\oplus}P}}$. We do this by proving that when either parity based bit-counting complexity class is provided as an oracle for a polynomial time Turing machine, then it can simulate the other one, that is ${\bf B_{|1| \oplus}P}\subseteq {\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|0| \oplus}P}}$ and ${\bf B_{|0| \oplus}P}\subseteq {\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|1| \oplus}P}}$.

cs.CC

Formalizing PARITY Circuit Lower Bounds in Lean

We formalize Hastad's PARITY lower bound in Lean using the switching lemma. For every fixed d >= 2, formulas and DAG circuits of computation depth at most d computing PARITY on n inputs require size exp(Omega_d(n^(1/(d-1)))) for all sufficiently large n. This matches the classical upper bound up to constants in the exponent and implies that PARITY is not in nonuniform AC0. We also construct a polynomial-size, logarithmic-depth bounded-fan-in formula family for PARITY, providing a witness to NC1 is not a subset of AC0 for the formalized models. The Lean source code is available at https://github.com/formalcs/circuit-complexity and is checked with Lean 4.33.1 and mathlib 4.33.1.

cs.CC

Constant-Coin Complete-Information Debates for $\mathsf{P}$ with Arbitrarily Small Strong Error

We study complete-information debate systems in which a probabilistic finite-state verifier reads the alternating messages of a prover and a refuter. Demirci, Say, and Yakaryılmaz showed that every language in $\mathsf{P}$ has such debates checkable with a constant number of random bits and arbitrarily small weak error. Their strong-error construction, which also counts nontermination as failure, did not permit arbitrary error reduction. We close this gap: for every $L\in\mathsf{P}$ and every $\varepsilon>0$, there is a constant-space verifier using a constant number of private coin tosses that has perfect completeness and strong error at most $\varepsilon$. The verifier simulates a polynomial-time alternating multihead finite automaton, privately spot-checking one of its input heads. The key observation is that, on a nonmember, the refuter may concede any round in which the prover first misreports a head reading. This ensures termination against every prover when the refuter follows the specified strategy, and permits strong-error reduction by repetition.

cs.CC