Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2609.23179

Counting edge-colorings of a complete graph avoiding a rainbow $K_4$

Abstract

For $k, r, n$ natural numbers let $ρ_{r,k}(K_n)$ be the number of $r$-edge-colorings of $K_n$ that do not contain a rainbow copy of a $K_k$, that is, a copy of $K_k$ in which all edges receive different colors. When $k=3$, the quantity $ρ_{r,3}(K_n)$ represents the number of Gallai Colorings. It was proved by Balogh and Li and independently by Bastos, Benevides and Han, that most of the Gallai colorings are 2-colorings, for $n$ large. A natural analogue conjecture would be that when $k=4$, $r\ge 5$ and $n$ large, most rainbow-$K_4$-free $r$-edge-colorings are $5$-colorings. We show that this is not true in general and identify an exact threshold for $r$ where this ceases to be true. For the range where the conjecture is false, we determine the exponential growth of $ρ_{r,4}(K_n)$ for every fixed $r$. More precisely, for \(6\le r\le24\), we prove that \(ρ_{r,4}(K_n)=(\binom{r}{5}+o(1))5^{\binom{n}{2}}\); and for each \(r\ge25\), the proportion using at most five colors tends to zero, and \(ρ_{r,4}(K_n)=r^{(n^2/4)+o(n^2)}\). A bipartite construction, with all edges within the two parts assigned one common color, achieves the latter exponential growth rate. The lower bounds can be easily generalized for every $k$. Those results are related to other recent results about counting colorings that avoid rainbow cliques or given rainbow patterns in general. Our proof combines hypergraph containers with the graph removal lemma, structural estimates for color palettes and a refined count of colorings close to a fixed five-color palette.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Fabricio S. Benevides, Josefran de O. Bastos. 2026-09-19. Counting edge-colorings of a complete graph avoiding a rainbow $K_4$. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.23179

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Partitioning perfect graphs into comparability graphs

We study how many comparability subgraphs are needed to partition the edge set of a perfect graph. We show that many classes of perfect graphs can be partitioned into (at most) two comparability subgraphs and this holds for almost all perfect graphs. On the other hand, we prove that for interval graphs an arbitrarily large number of comparability subgraphs might be necessary.

math.CO↗

On the homogeneity problem of the Kazhdan-Lusztig ideals

In this paper, our purpose is to find some techniques to identify inhomogeneous Kazhdan-Lusztig ideals. A set of generators of a Kazhdan-Lusztig ideal corresponds to some minors in some southwest submatrices inside some ambient matrix. We have defined a notion called a path inside a square matrix as a tool to work with determinants of the above mentioned minors. Using paths, we derive necessary and sufficient conditions for when such minors are inhomogeneous, singular, non-singular, and when there is divisibility between two terms of two such distinct minors. As a conclusion, we first provide an algorithm through which we can identify some sufficient conditions for a Kazhdan-Lusztig ideal to be inhomogeneous (by utilizing all the above mentioned results). Secondly, we provide certain sufficient conditions for a Kazhdan-Lusztig ideal to be standard homogeneous, and then we also prove that under certain assumptions, these conditions are also necessary for a Kazhdan-Lusztig ideal to be standard homogeneous.

math.CO↗

Random Permutation Matrices Form a Basis with High Probability

Let $d=(n-1)^2+1$, the dimension of the real linear span of the $n\times n$ permutation matrices. We prove that $d$ independent uniformly random permutation matrices fail to form a basis with probability $(1+o(1))n^2(1-1/n)^d=(e^{3/2}+o(1))n^2e^{-n}$. The same asymptotic holds for a uniformly random $d$-element subset, confirming a conjecture of Kushwaha and Tripathi and identifying the leading obstruction: a matrix position avoided by every sample. More generally, for any fixed number of additional samples, we determine the first three exponential orders of the failure probability. To prove these results, we develop support estimates valid over arbitrary fields, derive Fourier bounds from permanental minors, and introduce a counting argument for concentrated assignment functionals over large prime fields. We also give a sparse lifting argument showing that real rank deficiency without an annihilating functional of small support has probability $o(e^{-Cn})$ for every fixed $C>0$.

math.CO↗