Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2609.30900

Odd Cycle Transversal on $H$-free graphs

Abstract

\textsc{Odd Cycle Transversal} is a classic $\mathsf{NP}$-hard graph optimization problem asking for a minimum-weight set of vertices whose deletion makes the input graph bipartite, or equivalently, a maximum-weight induced bipartite subgraph. We show that \textsc{Odd Cycle Transversal} is quasi-polynomial-time solvable on $kP_4$-free graphs, for every fixed $k \in \mathbb{N}$. In fact, we provide an $n^{O_k(\log n)}$-time algorithm for the more general \textsc{Max-Weight List $2$-Colorable Induced Subgraph}, where the notation $O_{k}(\cdot)$ hides factors depending on $k$. Paired with known results from the literature, this allows us to obtain a complete complexity dichotomy for these two problems on $H$-free graphs into cases solvable in quasi-polynomial time and cases which are $\mathsf{NP}$-hard, in particular resolving an open problem of Agrawal, Lima, Lokshtanov, Saurabh, and Sharma [SODA 2024]. Our algorithms are based on a new structural tool that may be of independent interest. We introduce the notion of $H$-amiable family and show that, for every fixed graph $H$ without isolated vertices and every fixed $k\ge2$, every $kH$-free graph admits an $H$-amiable family of quasi-polynomial size that can be constructed in quasi-polynomial time. Besides yielding the aforementioned algorithms, this result gives, for every fixed connected graph $H$ and every fixed $k\ge2$, a reduction from \textsc{Max-Weight Independent Set} on $kH$-free graphs to the same problem on $H$-free graphs with $n^{O_{H,k}(\log n)}$ overhead. In this setting, it improves the $n^{O_{H,k}(\log^3 n)}$ overhead obtained by specializing the general reduction of Gartland and Lokshtanov [FOCS 2020].

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Esther Galby, Paloma T. de Lima, Andrea Munaro, Amir Nikabadi. 2026-09-25. Odd Cycle Transversal on $H$-free graphs. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.30900

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Computational complexity of the recoverable robust shortest path problem in acyclic digraphs under interval budgeted uncertainty

In this paper, we consider the recoverable robust shortest path problem in acyclic digraphs, employing interval budgeted uncertainty to model uncertain second-stage costs. For the continuous budgeted uncertainty model, we prove that the problem is strongly NP-hard even in layered digraphs. Furthermore, we show that in general acyclic digraphs, the problem cannot be approximated within any constant factor unless $\mathrm{P} = \mathrm{NP}$, nor can it be approximated within a factor of $2^{\log^{1-ε} n}$ for any $ε> 0$ unless $\mathrm{NP} \subseteq \mathrm{DTIME}(n^{\mathrm{poly} \log n})$. For the discrete budgeted uncertainty model, we show that the problem is not approximable unless $\mathrm{P} = \mathrm{NP}$, even in layered digraphs. Finally, we establish that under continuous budgeted uncertainty, the integrality gap of a relaxation allowing a fractional first-stage solution is at least $Ω(\sqrt{n})$.

cs.DS↗

Odd and Even Harder Problems on Cycle-Factors

For a graph (undirected or directed), a cycle-factor is a collection of vertex-disjoint cycles covering the entire vertex set. Cycle-factors subject to parity constraints arise naturally in the study of structural graph theory and algorithmic complexity. In this work, we study four variants of the problem of finding a cycle-factor subject to the following parity constraints: (1) all cycles are odd, (2) all cycles are even, (3) at least one cycle is odd, and (4) at least one cycle is even. We show that all the variants of the problem are NP-complete both in undirected and directed graphs, even if each vertex is incident to at most three edges. We also prove that the first two variants are NP-complete even for planar directed graphs.

cs.DS↗

An $n^{8/5+o(1)}$-Time $Ω(λ^3)$-Approximation for Longest Common Subsequence

Let $λ$ denote the ratio of the length of a longest common subsequence of two length-$n$ strings to $n$. Rubinstein, Seddighin, Song and Sun [RSSS19] gave an $Ω(λ^3)$-approximation for LCS running in $\widetilde O(n^{39/20})$ time, where $39/20=1.95$. Song [Son19] mentioned that improving the $n^{1.95}$ running time is an interesting open question. We give an algorithm that computes an $Ω(λ^3)$-approximation of the longest common subsequence in $n^{8/5+o(1)}$ time. This improves the exponent $1.95$ to $1.6+o(1)$.

cs.DS↗