Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2609.32733

A data structure for quotient flag complexes

Abstract

Vietoris-Rips filtrations, which are standard in topological data analysis, are flag complexes, and a simplex tree stores these without any attaching data. In this paper we ask what survives of this economy when a flag complex $K$ is divided by a subcomplex $A$, each connected component of $A$ being crushed to a point. Such a quotient is a CW complex whose cells are the simplices of $K\setminus A$, but their attaching maps are no longer implicit. We show that for flag $K$ the face order of the quotient is strictly graded exactly when $A$ is flag, and that the surviving labelled cells are determined by those of dimension at most 3. For $m$-flag pairs the threshold is $2m+1$, and it drops to $m+2$ when $K$ is flag. The prescribed cells form a regular CW decomposition only when $A$ is full in $K$. These results justify the QF-tree: a cell table that stores, for each surviving simplex, its ordered list of $d+1$ facets with collapsed facets flagged, indexed by a trie of quotient-vertex words. For bounded dimension its size is linear in the number of surviving simplices plus the retained provenance, and we derive and verify a simple formula for the collapsed fraction above which it is smaller than the homotopy-equivalent cone model. Because a collapse changes the attaching data only on the closed star of $A$, the QF-tree can also be applied locally inside a simplex tree. For a ball-shaped $A$ in the sampled Vietoris--Rips regime the closed star is a thin shell, and the median compact budget is below the cone model at every sampled radius. An accompanying library, modelled on Gudhi, implements the QF-tree, its local variant, an editable layer with local quotient updates, gluing, disc attachment, induced maps, cup products, fundamental-group presentations and zigzag persistence, and provided experiments separate the cost of maintaining a quotient from the cost of the algebra computed on it.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Konstantin Sorokin, Aleksandr Levin, Maxim Beketov, Anton Ayzenberg. 2026-09-26. A data structure for quotient flag complexes. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.32733

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

On Poincaré Surgery

We exhibit a homotopy theoretic proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Poincaré surgery in the simply connected case. We also deduce the Poincaré transversality exact sequence.

math.AT↗

Borsuk-Ulam type theorem for Stiefel manifolds and orthogonal mass partitions

We prove a Borsuk--Ulam-type zero theorem for the Stiefel manifold $V_{n,k}$ with the free action of the hyperoctahedral group $B_k=(\mathbb{Z}/2)^k\rtimes S_k$. The theorem gives a nonvanishing criterion for explicit polynomials in ${R}_{n,k}=\mathbb{F}_2[a_1,\ldots,a_k]/(a_1^n,a_2^{n-1},\ldots,a_k^{n-k+1})$. We apply this criterion to equipartitions by mutually orthogonal hyperplanes. If $(P_{k,n})^m\ne0$ in ${R}_{d,k}=\mathbb{F}_2[a_1,\ldots,a_k]/(a_1^{d+1},a_2^d,\ldots,a_k^{d-k+2})$, then any $m$ finite Borel measures in $\mathbb{R}^d$ that vanish on affine hyperplanes admit $k$ mutually orthogonal hyperplanes such that every $n$-element subfamily divides each measure into $2^n$ equal parts. For the least possible dimension $Δ^*(m,k,n)$, we obtain general lower bounds and prove upper bounds in several cases. These give exact values, including $Δ^*(2^j-1,k,2)=2^{j-1}(k+1)-1$ for all $j\ge1$ and $k\ge2$. In the case $n=k$, the upper bound of Mani-Levitska, Vrećica, and Zivaljević [18], originally obtained without an orthogonality requirement, remains valid under the stronger requirement that all $k$ hyperplanes be mutually orthogonal.

math.AT↗

Algebraically and geometrically minimal DG-models of diagrams of spaces

We extend Sullivan's rational homotopy theory by constructing geometrically and algebraically minimal models for diagrams of simply connected spaces over a class of finite indexing categories. Both classes classify rational diagram homotopy types, but their minimality conditions can differ. We also show that, in contrast to classical rational homotopy theory, H-diagrams need not split into products of Eilenberg--MacLane diagrams, and characterize the indexing categories for which every H-diagram admits such a splitting. Also we apply this to computation of automorphism groups of rational homotopy types of certain diagrams of spaces.

math.AT↗