Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2609.34514

How to Tame a Multi-Headed Hydra? Adaptive Multi-Category Safety Steering for Large Language Models

Abstract

As large language models (LLMs) become increasingly widespread, preventing unsafe responses to harmful prompts is essential for their safe deployment. Activation steering offers an approach to improving LLM safety by modifying internal activations during inference without updating model parameters. However, a single prompt can involve multiple harm categories, and steering toward safety in one category may leave harmful content from another unaddressed. Despite advances in adaptive steering, existing methods do not explicitly coordinate steering direction and strength when multiple harm categories co-occur within a single prompt. To address this problem, we propose CAM-Steer, a Category-Adaptive Multi-category Safety Steering framework. Specifically, it estimates the risk associated with each harm category by comparing the current hidden state with safe and unsafe prototypes. The estimated risks are then used to combine the safety directions for different harm categories into a single steering direction and to determine the strength of the intervention. Finally, it rotates the hidden state along the composed steering direction, with the rotation angle determined by the estimated risks, while preserving the hidden-state norm. Experiments across three LLM backbones and seven harm categories show that CAM-Steer outperforms the evaluated baselines in average defense success rate, including when categories co-occur. Further analyses support its component designs and informative risk scores, with negligible inference overhead.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Chenxi Wang, Ruiyang Huang, Li Huang, Yifan Wu. 2026-09-28. How to Tame a Multi-Headed Hydra? Adaptive Multi-Category Safety Steering for Large Language Models. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.34514

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Adversarial Defense in Cybersecurity: A Systematic Review of GANs for Threat Detection and Mitigation

Machine learning-based cybersecurity systems are highly vulnerable to adversarial attacks, while Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) act as both powerful attack enablers and promising defenses. This survey systematically reviews GAN-based adversarial defenses in cybersecurity (2021--August 31, 2025), consolidating recent progress, identifying gaps, and outlining future directions. Using a PRISMA-compliant systematic literature review protocol, we searched five major digital libraries. From 829 initial records, 185 peer-reviewed studies were retained and synthesized through quantitative trend analysis and thematic taxonomy development. We introduce a four-dimensional taxonomy spanning defensive function, GAN architecture, cybersecurity domain, and adversarial threat model. GANs improve detection accuracy, robustness, and data utility across network intrusion detection, malware analysis, and IoT security. Notable advances include WGAN-GP for stable training, CGANs for targeted synthesis, and hybrid GAN models for improved resilience. Yet, persistent challenges remain such as instability in training, lack of standardized benchmarks, high computational cost, and limited explainability. GAN-based defenses demonstrate strong potential but require advances in stable architectures, benchmarking, transparency, and deployment. We propose a roadmap emphasizing hybrid models, unified evaluation, real-world integration, and defenses against emerging threats such as LLM-driven cyberattacks. This survey establishes the foundation for scalable, trustworthy, and adaptive GAN-powered defenses.

cs.CR↗

CORE-BREW: LLR-Based Soft Decoding for Robust Multi-Bit LLM Watermarking

Reliable provenance for LLM outputs requires multi-bit watermarks that remain robust under editing while maintaining low false-positive rates. Existing ECC-based LLM watermarks rely on hard-decision decoding, discarding token-level reliability information and limiting robustness under post-generation edits. We propose CORE-BREW, a COnstant-hit-Rate Embedding extension of BREW for multi-bit watermarking. CORE-BREW calibrates the watermark channel by targeting a fixed hit rate $p^\star$, yielding closed-form per-token log-likelihood ratios (LLRs) for soft-decision decoding. It incorporates entropy-aware erasures to limit perturbations in low-entropy contexts and combines likelihood-based scoring with soft-decision list decoding to exploit soft evidence. Experiments on open-source LLMs under token-level edits and paraphrasing demonstrate that CORE-BREW generally improves detection robustness and payload recovery over the BREW baseline while maintaining low observed false-positive rates. Despite higher conditional perplexity, BLEU and BERTScore remain close to those of unwatermarked text, indicating comparable reference-based translation quality.

cs.CR↗

CoSec: Benchmarking Agent Security in Communities

LLM agents operate in persistent collaborative environments involving multiple users, communities, memories, files, and tools. Community boundaries may remain fixed or evolve with changes in membership, roles, composition, and relationships. Agents must complete legitimate tasks and prevent unauthorized disclosure of protected information. Existing evaluations do not fully examine these risks in agent systems. We introduce \textbf{CoSec}, an executable benchmark for evaluating privacy and authorization enforcement in LLM agent systems operating within and across communities. CoSec contains 208 canonical scenarios spanning fixed and evolving boundaries, protected information belonging to the agent owner or other participants, and attacks through dialogue, environmental content, persistent memory, and composed workflows. CoSec executes complete agent systems with persistent sessions, memory, files and tools. It verifies information flows against the active authorization state using execution traces and artifacts. Across harness and model configurations, agents frequently complete benign tasks but violate privacy and authorization boundaries. Privacy behavior varies across harnesses, attack surfaces, and community states, revealing how memory, files, tools, and workflows can carry protected information beyond its authorized scope. These findings show that task utility does not imply privacy or authorization compliance and that authorization in community settings remains an unresolved security challenge for persistent LLM agents.

cs.CR↗