Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2609.36257

When Hedging Changes the Payoff: Option Replication with Price Impact and Execution Costs

Abstract

Hedging a derivative by trading the underlying asset changes the payoff that the hedging intended to replicate. We study this phenomenon when trading generates price impact and execution costs. In a binomial model, we characterize replication through a fixed-point equation. In continuous time, we derive a nonlinear pricing PDE whose implicit terminal condition captures the nature of the moving target problem of the hedger. For monotone convex Lipschitz payoffs (such as calls and puts) we establish exact replication under midpoint execution costs. Numerical experiments illustrate: (i) how price impact shifts the effective strike, (ii) the non-linear dependence of the option price on the number of contracts, (iii) how execution costs smooth terminal holdings, (iv) the extent to which the hedger's own trading can bring an otherwise worthless option into the money, and (v) we explain the spread and the shape of the limit order book in the options market based on the price impact and the shape of the limit order book of the underlying.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

David Itkin, Leandro Sánchez-Betancourt. 2026-09-28. When Hedging Changes the Payoff: Option Replication with Price Impact and Execution Costs. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.36257

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Choice of Collateral Currency in Differential Swaps

The role of collateral in derivative pricing has evolved beyond credit risk mitigation, particularly following the global financial crisis, when funding costs and basis spreads became central to valuation practices. This development coincided with the transition from the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) to risk-free rates (RFRs) and the increasing standardization of collateralised trading. We study the valuation and hedging of a class of differential swaps referencing backward-looking averages of overnight rates, with Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) swaps appearing as a particular instance. The focus is on the impact of the collateral currency. Extending the earlier results of Bickersteth et al. [Math. Finance 36 (2026), pp.~180--202], we allow the collateral account to be denominated in a currency different from that of the contractual cash flows and derive explicit pricing and hedging strategies using a futures-based replication approach. We show that the choice of collateral currency can have a non-trivial effect on both valuation and risk management through discounting adjustments and payment-date weights. Numerical experiments validate the closed-form formulas, demonstrate that collateral effects can produce valuation adjustments, and confirm the effectiveness of the futures hedges under discrete rebalancing.

q-fin.MF↗

DYSANOS Generative Dynamic Smooth Arbitrage-free Non-parametric Option Surfaces

This article presents with DYSANOS the first generative market model for smooth SANOS option surfaces for all strikes and expiries which are free of static arbitrage. Our model is designed to generate entire paths of daily spot and option prices for years in the future. We present a robust and useful if somewhat simplistic baseline in the form of an AR(1) model. We discuss model setup, data pipeline, and training and investigate market reconstruction, stability, and tail behavior. We illustrate model performance on 891 Option Metrics IvyDB S&P Index surfaces from 2022-01-03 through to 2025-08-29. We also demonstrate how to construct numerically a risk-neutral density. As part of this we develop a new test for zero conditional means under a given measure. We show that for a set of 100,000 simulated paths a trading universe of 48 options and spot is numerically free of dynamic arbitrage.

q-fin.MF↗

Loss-versus-rebalancing with external proportional transaction costs

We study liquidity provision in automated market makers when trading in the external market incurs proportional transaction costs. We consider both separately collected fees and fees retained in reserves. The benchmark is a self-financing strategy holding the same total risky inventory and trading at the external bid and ask. Under continuous external prices and pure arbitrage, the pool and benchmark have identical liquidation wealth whenever the pool fee or the external spread is positive. Thus loss-versus-rebalancing relative to this transaction-cost benchmark is zero, even without a pool fee if the external spread is positive. We then construct retained-fee utility-indifference pools that implement admissible decreasing inventory schedules, and geometric mean pools that implement feasible constant no-trade boundaries for portfolio weights. These results offer an investment interpretation of liquidity provision: by choosing the pool design, a liquidity provider can specify a trading strategy whose rebalancing is carried out by arbitrageurs.

q-fin.MF↗