Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.03174

FinNextAssist: Towards Professional Financial Deep Research Assistant

Xiangyu Li·Fengbin Zhu·Xuan Yao·Siyu Liu·Xiaoluan Liu·Chao Wang·Huanbo Luan·Xiaofen Xing·Xiangmin Xu·Ke-Wei Huang·Richang Hong·Tat-Seng Chua
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Deep Research (DR) agents have demonstrated strong capabilities in complex, research-oriented tasks through autonomous planning, iterative retrieval, multi-step reasoning, and structured reporting. However, adapting DR agents to finance introduces unique challenges: financial analysis demands the joint completion of heterogeneous sub-tasks spanning diverse data types, tools, and analytical workflows. We identify three key requirements for a professional financial DR agent: integration of authoritative, heterogeneous financial data sources; specialized analytical tools and skills; and dedicated sub-agents for domain-specific sub-tasks. Building on these principles, we propose FinNextAssist, an end-to-end deep research framework designed for professional financial analysis. FinNextAssist decomposes the research process into four stages: Task Planner, Evidence Compiler, Reasoning Engine, and Report Assembler, and introduces two novel lightweight sub-agents: TabAgent, for cross-market financial table understanding, and HeteroAgent, for cross-modality heterogeneous financial data interpretation. Extensive experiments on FinDeepResearch, the Finance Agent Benchmark, and FinTMMBench-Web show that FinNextAssist substantially outperforms both strong proprietary and open-source DR agents, with ablation studies confirming the contribution of each component across diverse markets and languages.

Explore related subjects

cs.MAq-fin.CP

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Xiangyu Li, Fengbin Zhu, Xuan Yao, Siyu Liu, Xiaoluan Liu, Chao Wang, Huanbo Luan, Xiaofen Xing, Xiangmin Xu, Ke-Wei Huang, Richang Hong, Tat-Seng Chua. 2026-10-02. FinNextAssist: Towards Professional Financial Deep Research Assistant. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.03174

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Can CaMeLs Talk? Securing Multi-Agent Systems Against Indirect Prompt Injection Attacks

Indirect prompt injection attacks - malicious instructions embedded in content processed by large language models - remain a major obstacle to safely deploying tool-using agents. CaMeL [Debenedetti et al., 2025] mitigates this threat for an individual agent by separating trusted control flow from untrusted data and enforcing capability-based security policies at runtime. In this work, we investigate whether CaMeL's security guarantees compose in hierarchical multi-agent systems, where agents invoke other agents as tools. We find that CaMeL's guarantees do not compose. We construct a concrete prompt-injection attack that succeeds despite all constituent agents individually operating CaMeL. Our attack exploits the fact that untrusted data can be reinterpreted as trusted input by a downstream agent. We then introduce multi-CaMeL, an agent-to-agent communication protocol that preserves provenance across agent boundaries by separating trusted natural-language instructions from untrusted data passed through a distinct data channel. We evaluate multi-CaMeL's utility on AssetOpsBench and its security-utility tradeoff on MultiAgentDojo, a benchmark we develop by extending AgentDojo to the multi-agent setting. We find that multi-CaMeL reduces attack success rate (ASR) to 0.0%, compared with 0.2% for individual-agent CaMeL and 12.9% with no CaMeL. Multi-CaMeL incurs a utility cost, but this cost trends downward as model capability increases and is modest for the strongest models, suggesting that more capable models better accommodate the constraints imposed by the protocol.

cs.MA↗
arXiv2026

Scalar Communication via Random Direction Refreshing for Distributed Optimization

Distributed optimization over networks requires agents to repeatedly exchange decision variables with their neighbors. When the decision dimension $d$ is large, these exchanges dominate the communication cost, which is critical for bandwidth-constrained agents. Existing remedies quantize or sparsify the exchanged vectors, yet each message still scales with $d$ and the compression error must be compensated by additional states. To address this limitation, we propose a scalar-communication mechanism in which every neighbor message carries a single real number regardless of $d$. Agents regenerate a common random direction from a shared seed, transmit only the inner product of their state with that direction, and act on the resulting rank-one surrogate of their neighbors' states while retaining full local gradients. We develop and analyze the mechanism for an existing continuous-time distributed optimization algorithm. For strongly convex local costs with Lipschitz gradients, we show that the optimizer remains the unique consensus equilibrium, that a fixed direction admits spurious equilibria, and that refreshing the direction at a sufficiently high rate yields exponential mean-square and almost-sure convergence with constant gains and no residual error. The framework admits any isotropic fixed-norm direction distribution, including Rademacher, scaled-coordinate, and sphere-normalized Gaussian directions; all three attain lower fresh-encoding variance than unnormalized Gaussian directions. The effects of the direction distribution and the refresh interval are illustrated in~simulations.

cs.MA↗
arXiv2026

Who Keeps the Gains from Personal AI Assistants? Seller Adaptation and the Unassisted in a Language-Model Market Simulation

Personal AI assistants are beginning to transact for consumers, and early adopters capture real savings. Whether those savings survive, and what happens to consumers who have no assistant, depends on how sellers respond -- a question single-user evidence cannot answer. We build an agent-based rental market in which language models play consumers, assistants, and six adaptive sellers guided by an algorithmic pricing tool. Half the population receives an assistant under an advisory or an executing mandate; the contract pairs a fee only the renter's physical action avoids with a pre-selected add-on an authorised assistant can cancel online. An analytical benchmark and a behaviourally calibrated rule market supply ex-ante predictions, and paired branches with frozen versus adaptive sellers separate adoption effects from market feedback. Across thirty simulated markets, executing assistants cut adopters' spending by 13.7 USD per renter-day when sellers are frozen; adaptation claws back about a third, leaving 8.7, with the gains arriving both as lower bills and as rentals completed at all. Sellers raise headline rates while cutting fees, and the calibrated forecast of the burden on unassisted consumers (+3.6) does not transfer: their mean spending change is +0.4, confidence interval -0.6 to +1.3. Seller-model swaps and a within-market transfer of fee-setting to the pricing tool show that fee conduct, and with it the division of the gains, is decided on the seller side. Assistants, we conclude, should be evaluated at market level -- completion, total spending, and non-users included -- and the comparison layers locate exactly where a calibrated behavioural forecast fails in a language-model market.

cs.MA↗