Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.05013

EMBER-Bench: Benchmarking Cross-Event Causal Memory in Long-Horizon Embodied Tasks

Abstract

Lifelong physical agents must reason over extended interactions where past events continue to shape the world long after they disappear from view. Beyond recalling what happened, agents must infer how history changes the current state and constrains future actions. Yet existing embodied and video-memory benchmarks largely focus on historical retrieval and summary, leaving such history-dependent causal reasoning underexplored. We introduce EMBER-Bench, an egocentric benchmark for cross-event causal reasoning in long-horizon embodied tasks, for which we newly created the task design, video recording, and data annotation. It contains 189 household tasks and 699 QA pairs, spanning task progress, failure recovery, external interventions, and compound long-horizon tasks with distant dependencies and prerequisites, with fine-grained event and causal-chain annotations. EMBER-Bench evaluates reasoning in both directions: next-action prediction selects the next action from history, and causal traceback, given that action, identifies the historical event that makes it necessary. Input ablations that add action logs or privileged cause-and-consequence annotations to the video indicate which kind of historical information models fail to use. Among the 16 evaluated models, the highest overall accuracy is 61.2%, compared with a mean of 98.3% across two human evaluators. At paired decision points, correct traceback is not associated with correct next-action prediction. Adding action logs yields a gain of 1.6 points, whereas cause-and-consequence annotations yield an additional gain of 13.0 points on top of that. These results suggest that extracting causal information from past events and converting it into constraints on current actions remains a key difficulty for long-horizon embodied agents. Project Page: https://zhaoalexgoat.github.io/EMBER-Bench/

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Aoyang Cai, Boning Zhao, Shaoxuan Xie, Dahui Gao, Huan Yang, Zhongyuan Wang, Zhiwei Yu, Guocai Yao. 2026-10-04. EMBER-Bench: Benchmarking Cross-Event Causal Memory in Long-Horizon Embodied Tasks. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.05013

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Large Pretraining Datasets Don't Guarantee Robustness after Fine-Tuning in Image Classification

Large-scale pretrained models are widely leveraged as foundations for learning new specialized tasks via fine-tuning, with the goal of maintaining the general performance of the model while allowing it to gain new skills. A valuable goal for all such models is robustness: the ability to perform well on out-of-distribution (OOD) tasks. We assess whether fine-tuning preserves the overall robustness of the pretrained model in image classification, and observed that models pretrained on large datasets exhibited strong catastrophic forgetting and loss of OOD generalization. To systematically assess robustness preservation in fine-tuned models, we propose the Robustness Inheritance Benchmark (ImageNet-RIB). The benchmark, which can be applied to any pretrained model, consists of a set of related but distinct OOD (downstream) tasks and involves fine-tuning on one of the OOD tasks in the set then testing on the rest. We find that though continual learning methods help, fine-tuning reduces robustness across pretrained models. Surprisingly, models pretrained on the largest and most diverse datasets (e.g., LAION-2B) exhibit both larger robustness losses and lower absolute robustness after fine-tuning on small datasets, relative to models pretrained on smaller datasets. We observe this collapse in contrastively pretrained (CLIP) models and their fine-tuned variants, where it grows with pretraining scale; the supervised models we test do not exhibit it. These findings suggest that starting with the strongest foundation model is not necessarily the best approach for performance on specialist tasks. https://jd730.github.io/projects/ImageNet-RIB

cs.CV↗

Feature Space Analysis by Guided Diffusion Model

This paper aims to analyse the feature space of a vision-related Deep Neural Network (DNN) by proposing a decoder that can generate an image whose feature closely matches a user-specified feature. Supported by quantitative evidence of its high feature-matching accuracy, our decoder facilitates precise analysis of the DNN's feature space. Our decoder is implemented as a guided diffusion model that guides the image generation of a pre-trained diffusion model to minimise the Euclidean distance between the feature of a clean image estimated at each step and the user-specified feature. The key advantages of our decoder are its training-free applicability to analyse the feature spaces of different DNNs and its practical feasibility on a single COTS GPU. The experiments targeting CLIP's image encoder and ResNet-50 demonstrate the effectiveness of our decoder both as a feature-matching image generator and as a visual feature space analyser. The codes and data are available at https://github.com/ccilab-doshisha/FeatDec

cs.CV↗

Scaling Laws for Deepfake Detection

This paper presents a systematic study of scaling laws for the deepfake detection task. Specifically, we analyze the model performance against the number of real image domains, deepfake generation methods, and training images. Since no existing dataset meets the scale requirements for this research, we construct ScaleDF, the largest dataset to date in this field, which contains over 5.8 million real images from 51 different datasets (domains) and more than 8.8 million fake images generated by 102 deepfake methods. Using ScaleDF, we observe power-law scaling similar to that shown in large language models (LLMs). Specifically, the average detection error follows a predictable power-law decay as either the number of real domains or the number of deepfake methods increases. This key observation not only allows us to forecast the number of additional real domains or deepfake methods required to reach a target performance, but also inspires us to counter the evolving deepfake technology in a data-centric manner. Beyond this, we examine the role of pre-training and data augmentations in deepfake detection under scaling, as well as the limitations of scaling itself.The ScaleDF dataset is available at https://huggingface.co/datasets/WenhaoWang/ScaleDF.

cs.CV↗