Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.08840

Beyond the Sycophancy Score: How Task, Model, and Pressure Shape LLM Yielding

Guang Yang·Homa Hosseinmardi·Fengchen Liu·Amir Ghasemian
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) often abandon a correct answer, or endorse a user's position, once the user pushes back. This behavior, called sycophancy, is usually reported as a single rate per model, which says little about when it happens or how a user can avoid it. We study the conditions that produce it with 103,939 graded replies from ten configurations: eight LLMs with reasoning disabled, and two of them again with maximum reasoning, all facing the same 200 items, 13 pressure conditions, and four-turn conversations, with every reply labeled by two independent LLM judges. We find that the dominant factors are how costly it is for the model to verify the user's claim, and whether a trained guardrail covers it. Removing this task factor from a logistic model costs 0.485 of McFadden $R^2$, against 0.139 for model family and 0.009 for pressure tactic. Anchored facts are almost never conceded (1.3%), while adoption on logic puzzles rises with the number of clues needed to refute the pushed answer. Personal choices are endorsed in 77.0% of conversations. Most concessions on hard items come from models that cannot reliably solve them; models that can solve them rarely give the answer up. For both models tested, maximum reasoning removes these concessions completely: adoption on deep puzzles falls from 19.2% and 12.5% to 0%. Fallacious or emotional framing adds nothing beyond plain repetition. Three human annotators agree with the judges' consensus on 118/120 calibration items. These results give practical rules for reliable use: simplify hard-to-verify problems and reason deeply, state the question rather than one's preferred answer, ask for evidence on open questions, and choose models by their measured guardrail profile.

Explore related subjects

cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Guang Yang, Homa Hosseinmardi, Fengchen Liu, Amir Ghasemian. 2026-09-30. Beyond the Sycophancy Score: How Task, Model, and Pressure Shape LLM Yielding. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.08840

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Post-Training Large Language Models via Reinforcement Learning from Self-Feedback

Large Language Models (LLMs) often produce plausible but poorly-calibrated answers, limiting their reliability on reasoning-intensive tasks. Recent research suggests that Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning paths are inherent in pre-trained LLMs and can be elicited by simply altering the decoding process, where the presence of a CoT path correlates with higher answer confidence. Building on these insights, we present Reinforcement Learning from Self-Feedback (RLSF), a post-training stage that utilises the model's intrinsic confidence as a self-generated reward. By generating multiple CoT decoding beams from a frozen LLM, we compute the confidence of each final answer span and rank the resulting traces accordingly to create synthetic preferences. These preferences are subsequently utilised to fine-tune the policy through standard preference optimisation, requiring no human labels, gold answers, or externally curated rewards. RLSF simultaneously (i) refines the model's probability estimates--restoring well-behaved calibration--and (ii) strengthens step-by-step reasoning, yielding improved performance on arithmetic reasoning and multiple-choice question answering. By converting a model's own uncertainty into structured self-feedback, RLSF affirms reinforcement learning on intrinsic model behaviour as a principled and data-efficient component of the LLM post-training pipeline. Our results demonstrate that leveraging these inherent reasoning capabilities provides a robust path for enhancing model reliability without manual prompt engineering or external supervision.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

Majority Bit-Aware Watermarking For Large Language Models

The growing deployment of Large Language Models (LLMs) has raised concerns about their misuse in generating harmful or deceptive content. To address this issue, watermarking methods have been proposed to embed identifiable multi-bit messages into generated text for misuse tracing. However, existing methods often suffer from a fundamental trade-off between text quality and decoding accuracy. In particular, they have to restrict the size of the preferred token set (i.e., green list) during encoding to maintain a detectable watermark signal for decoding, which inevitably degrades generation quality. To improve this trade-off, we propose a novel message encoding paradigm called \textit{majority bit-aware encoding}, which relaxes the watermark signal strength from the green list size. This strategy allows for a strong watermark signal to be preserved in generated texts even when using a large green list. We introduce two instantiations of this paradigm: MajorMark and MajorMark$^{+}$, where the latter is specifically optimized for long messages. Extensive experiments on state-of-the-art LLMs demonstrate that our methods achieve higher decoding accuracy and superior text quality compared to prior baselines. The code is at https://github.com/JiiahaoXU/MajorMark.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

Demasking Fine-Tuning for Knowledge Injection in Autoregressive and Diffusion LLMs

Large language models (LLMs) are often used in environments where facts evolve, yet factual knowledge updates via fine-tuning on unstructured plain text often suffer from 1) reliance on paraphrasing augmentation, without which training does not generalize to downstream QA tasks, and 2) the reversal curse. Recent evidence of the sample efficiency of masked diffusion large language models (dLLMs) and the bidirectional information flow in their demasking training objective suggests that the demasking objective may facilitate knowledge learning from raw knowledge text. We test this hypothesis in controlled knowledge fine-tuning experiments on dLLMs and autoregressive LLMs (arLLMs) and find that while arLLMs rely on paraphrase augmentation to generalize knowledge text into question-answering (QA) capability, dLLMs do not require paraphrases to achieve high QA accuracy. We find that giving arLLMs a demasking objective, where the LLM must reconstruct the original text from a masked copy given in context, improves the efficacy of knowledge injection, removing the need for paraphrases and mitigating the reversal curse, recovering most of the gap between arLLMs and dLLMs. We also provide preliminary evidence of the broader applicability of using the demasking objective in arLLM fine-tuning on a large-scale knowledge-intensive dataset.

cs.CL↗