Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.10456

Risk-minimizing GUE-implementations of truthful reporting in a Dynamic Social Choice Problem

Abstract

The Guaranteed Utility Mechanism (GUM) was introduced to implement efficiency in Guaranteed Utility Equilibrium (GUE) in dynamic social choice problems. We show that this mechanism also has a previously unknown connection to risk minimization. Fixing an efficient decision policy, we study variance-minimizing budget-balanced transfer rules in the class of GUE-implementations of truthful reporting. A symmetrized version of GUM (sym-GUM) minimizes the sum of the agents' utility variances under truthful reporting when there is no public state. When a public state is present, a slight modification of this rule yields the minimizer for the same objective. Sym-GUM, however, does not minimize transfer risk. The minimizer for that problem is instead the symmetrized version of a closely related GUM-like transfer rule. In both problems, the minimizing truthful total transfers are unique up to agent-specific constants summing to zero and events of probability zero.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Endre Csóka, Máté Viczián. 2026-10-07. Risk-minimizing GUE-implementations of truthful reporting in a Dynamic Social Choice Problem. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.10456

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Existence of Bayesian Equilibria in Incomplete Information Games without Common Priors

This paper focuses on finite-player incomplete information games where players may hold mutually inconsistent beliefs without a common prior. We introduce absolute continuity of beliefs, extending the classical notion of absolute continuity of information in Milgrom and Weber (1985), and prove that Bayesian equilibria exist in a broad class of games, including those with discontinuous payoffs. Examples illustrate the scope and implications of our findings.

econ.TH↗

Bundling Complements

I study a monopolist selling goods to a buyer with combinatorial preferences. The seller's dual is a minimum-cost flow of the differential virtual value. I characterize two reductions: when the differential virtual value is represented on types, and when this representation is independent of the preference. The distribution then determines the \emph{required directions}, along which the dual transports mass, and the preference the \emph{covered directions} of each bundle; optimality is full coverage. Comparative statics in the preference use this separation: a premium on bundles containing a core of goods models complementarity and widens their covered directions. Two thresholds describe the optimum: above a lower threshold the grand bundle must be offered; above an upper threshold a \emph{core-peripheral} menu --- a bundled core with optional add-ons not sold standalone --- is optimal. The upper threshold is finite if and only if the menu is \emph{inclusive}: it excludes no near-top buyer.

econ.TH↗

Breaking the Chain: Division Norms and Criminal Deterrence

We study how internal division norms affect the cost of deterring a criminal organization, holding every coalition's proceeds fixed. The authority assigns deterrence capacity to named members after these norms are fixed but before coalitions form. Under population-monotone division, where no incumbent loses rent as a coalition expands, the minimum budget required to block every coalition equals the cost of the cheapest removal order. Targeting a high-rent hub first can reduce total costs because its removal lowers the rents of the remaining members. Our main result identifies the most resistant division norm: when the Shapley value applied to every coalition is population monotone, it uniquely maximizes the required budget within this class by making all removal orders equally costly. For a fixed norm in this class, allowing some proceeds to be reallocated after capacities are observed weakly increases the budget, reaching the full organization's proceeds under full transferability. Exact Shapley optimality can fail at arbitrarily small positive liquidity.

econ.TH↗