Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.13446

Realized Tail-Risk Conditional Autoregressive Expectile Models: Accurate and Stable Forecasting Performance

Abstract

A realized tail-risk conditional autoregressive expectile (RTCARE) model is proposed for joint forecasting of value-at-risk (VaR) and expected shortfall (ES). Realized tail measures such as the realized quantile and the realized ES, constructed from intraday high-frequency returns, are incorporated into the dynamics and measurement equations of the conditional expectile, allowing information about lower-tail risk to enter the forecasts. The parameters are estimated by Markov chain Monte Carlo, and we evaluate the resulting VaR-ES forecasts in numerical examples and in an empirical application using U.S. stock-return data. Across the considered tail levels, the RTCARE models deliver competitive and often superior forecasting performance relative to existing alternatives, with stable results across Monte Carlo replications and rolling forecast evaluations.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Keisuke Sasaki, Yasuhiro Omori. 2026-10-09. Realized Tail-Risk Conditional Autoregressive Expectile Models: Accurate and Stable Forecasting Performance. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.13446

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Representation Multiplicity in Causal Forests

Including covariates alongside strictly monotone transformations can change a causal forest's treatment decisions without adding information. Random feature selection favors covariates represented by these multiple columns. Under stated conditions, I show that this imbalance can persist as samples grow. Treatment effect components associated with other covariates are omitted, attenuated, or recovered depending on their inclusion probabilities and tree depth. Simulations and a job-training replication illustrate sensitivity to redundant transformations. Sampling groups of variables that generate identical splits restores prediction invariance on the grouping data when fitting and randomization are held fixed.

econ.EM↗

A Balanced Parametrization of Correlation Matrices

We introduce the balanced correlation parametrization (BCP), which maps positive-definite correlation matrices one-to-one onto the set of symmetric hollow matrices. A key feature of the parametrization is that both the transformation and its inverse are available in closed form. It combines marginal and partial correlations, is inverse-consistent and equivariant under variable permutations and sign changes, and preserves block structure. A novel property of BCP is that it preserves correlation sparsity as the dimension tends to infinity under suitable factor conditions, providing a basis for sparse high-dimensional correlation modeling. An empirical illustration using standardized idiosyncratic daily stock returns for 1,765 equities over 15 years shows that BCP retains the approximate sparsity pattern and magnitudes of shock correlations, and that it yields accurate positive-definite reconstructions under sparse coordinate restrictions.

econ.EM↗

Is Inference Conditional on Not Rejecting a Pre-test Less Reliable than Unconditional Inference?

Researchers often report an estimate and confidence interval only if a specification test does not reject - for example, only if a pre-trend test supports a difference-in-differences design. Does this make the reported confidence interval less reliable? We show that when the identifying assumptions hold, the answer is no: conditional on passing the pre-test, the confidence interval may over-cover but cannot under-cover. When the assumptions fail, pre-testing can reduce coverage, but under an additional condition it still improves coverage relative to not pre-testing. A calibration to 12 differences-in-differences examples suggests modest effects of pre-testing on coverage.

econ.EM↗