Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.13702

Two-Sided Plausibility Constraints in Persuasion

Abstract

A sender with commitment provides additional information to an already informed receiver. Final posterior means must be more dispersed than initial means and less dispersed than the state, in convex order. We characterize when these two plausibility constraints are also sufficient, so that every distribution satisfying them can be induced. If the state has a positive density, they are sufficient exactly under interval-partition information: the receiver learns which interval of a partition contains the state and nothing more, where an interval may be a single point. Otherwise, a nonempty open set of distributions satisfying both constraints cannot be induced, even when the sender observes the receiver's information. We use the sufficient case to derive an optimal symmetric disclosure rule in a second-price auction where bidders initially know valuation intervals.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Constantine Sorokin. 2026-10-09. Two-Sided Plausibility Constraints in Persuasion. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.13702

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Robust Capital Budgeting

We study capital budgeting when a manager privately knows project productivity and her empire-building benefits, while headquarters lacks credible priors. Headquarters minimizes maximum regret relative to informed investment. Without compensation, the optimal policy is a spending cap balancing empire-building overinvestment against profitable investment forgone. Compensation helps when empire-building incentives are weak. The optimal payment incentivizes restraint, declines with investment, and reaches zero at the spending cap, supporting greater managerial discretion. When empire-building incentives are strong, compensation cannot distinguish productive investment from biased expansion; therefore, a spending cap alone is optimal.

econ.TH↗

Incentive Contracts and Peer Effects in the Workplace

We analyze how firms should design wage contracts when workers collaborate in teams and effort costs depend on colleagues through a peer network. Performance-based compensation generates incentives that cascade through the organization, which firms target to boost profits. We analyze optimal incentive design if firms can---and can't---fully discriminate across workers, and when the production technology is separable or complementary across divisions. When workers' effort is substitutable, the most central workers---those who influence most colleagues directly and indirectly---receive the steepest incentives only when output risk is sufficiently large; otherwise firms prioritize workers who are closer to those they influence. When production technology exhibits complementarity across teams, stronger incentives are assigned to workers who influence colleagues in small teams that receive little influence from others. For high levels of output risk, we derive a sufficient network statistic that approximates the profit loss when firms must compensate workers of varying centrality equally. Finally, we apply our findings to organizational design questions, such as optimal firm structure and workforce investments.

econ.TH↗

Convex Choice

For multidimensional Euclidean type spaces, we study convex choice: from any choice set, the set of types that make the same choice is convex. We establish that, in a suitable sense, this property characterizes the sufficiency of local incentive constraints. Convex choice is also of interest more broadly, e.g., in cheap-talk games. We tie convex choice to a notion of directional single-crossing differences (DSCD). For an expected-utility agent choosing among lotteries, DSCD implies that preferences are either one-dimensional or must take the affine form that has been tractable in multidimensional mechanism design.

econ.TH↗