From Sky to Science: Time Domain Astronomy with the ILMT Survey

Kuntal Misra; Bhavya Ailawadhi; Talat Akhunov; Monalisa Dubey; Naveen Dukiya; Sara Filali; Paul Hickson; Priyanshi Kumari; Gokul Singh Mehra; Vibhore Negi; Kumar Pranshu; Jean Surdej; Sarvesh Kumar Yadav

arXiv · 2610.14827

From Sky to Science: Time Domain Astronomy with the ILMT Survey

Kuntal Misra·Bhavya Ailawadhi·Talat Akhunov·Monalisa Dubey·Naveen Dukiya·Sara Filali·Paul Hickson·Priyanshi Kumari·Gokul Singh Mehra·Vibhore Negi·Kumar Pranshu·Jean Surdej·Sarvesh Kumar Yadav

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The PyLMT transient detection pipeline has been operational since November 2023 and has detected $\sim$10,000 transients and variable objects in ILMT images in near real time. The survey has enabled the discovery and characterisation of a range of bright and faint optical transients. The detected population spans a broad diversity of astrophysical phenomena, including supernovae, variable stars, active galactic nuclei (AGN) variability, and Solar System objects such as asteroids and comets. We provide a concise overview of the detection of a variety of transient and variable classes identified with the ILMT, emphasising the survey's potential contributions to a broad class of astrophysical sources. We highlight representative science cases, including supernovae, AGNs, variable stars, and asteroids, to demonstrate the scientific potential of the ILMT survey.

Explore related subjects

astro-ph.IM

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Kuntal Misra, Bhavya Ailawadhi, Talat Akhunov, Monalisa Dubey, Naveen Dukiya, Sara Filali, Paul Hickson, Priyanshi Kumari, Gokul Singh Mehra, Vibhore Negi, Kumar Pranshu, Jean Surdej, Sarvesh Kumar Yadav. 2026-10-10. From Sky to Science: Time Domain Astronomy with the ILMT Survey. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.14827

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Parameter estimation in differential equations: Mathematical foundations for satellite gravimetry, review and perspectives

Satellite gravimetry has become essential in many areas of earth science. However, the resolution of satellite gravitational models remains low at scales of a few hundreds km and no gravity recovery methods can take full advantages of unprecedented high accuracy of satellite tracking measurements. We first provide a unified theoretical framework of parameter estimation in differential equations for satellite gravimetry and then briefly review the mathematical methods to compute the gravity field of the Earth from satellite tracking. We focus on the collocation method, Kaula linear perturbations, two-point boundary value problems and orbit-energy-based methods. The numerical integration method is also included in this review, though it has been proved to be mathematically incorrect and physically not permitted. The reason is that it has become the standard method to routinely produce global gravitational models from satellite tracking data, which have been widely applied in many different areas of earth science. Because it is not clear how the incorrect foundation would affect gravity products from satellite tracking, we do not review any applications of these products. We then present a measurement-based perturbation theory to estimate the gravity field of the Earth, which can fully utilize both precise satellite orbits of arbitrary length and unprecedented high accuracy of satellite and inter-satellite tracking. The method is theoretically free of modeling errors, is capable of extracting any small forces from satellite and inter-satellite tracking data and provides a guarantee for high-precision and high-resolution global gravity models. Finally, we assume a reference gravity model and derive local solutions to the Newton's nonlinear governing differential equations of satellite motion for scattered tracking data that can still be important in some applications.

astro-ph.IM↗

arXiv2026

Charge Response Simulation of Liquid Argon Compton Cameras for Precise MeV Gamma-Ray Event Reconstruction

We studied the detector response for a liquid-argon time-projection chamber (LArTPC) Compton camera targeting MeV gamma-ray astronomy by a Geant4-based Monte Carlo simulation. The simulation, implemented within ComptonSoft, incorporates electron-ion recombination, charge diffusion, and induction on the electrode pixels. We evaluated the angular resolution measure (ARM) and the energy reconstruction error as functions of electronic noise, pixel pitch, and the recombination correction method. An electronic noise level of 4 keV and a pixel pitch of 1 mm yield an ARM (FWHM) of about 3 degrees at 1332.5 keV and an energy reconstruction error better than 4\% for incident energies of 1173.2 keV and above. Recombination correction using both scintillation light and charge signals improves the ARM and the energy error by factors of 1.7--2.3 and 2.2--5.4, respectively, compared to the charge-only correction, although the uncertainty of the recombination-fluctuation model remains. Since this simulation relies on idealized assumptions such as the use of the Monte Carlo truth in the event reconstruction, these values represent the best cases achievable under these detector conditions; nevertheless, they show that a large-scale LArTPC is a promising Compton camera for cosmic MeV gamma-ray observations.

astro-ph.IM↗

arXiv2026

Establishing baseline model performances for optical turbulence forecasting

Accurate forecasting of optical turbulence (OT) is useful to optimise telescope scheduling and maximising observing efficiency, as the performance of adaptive optics systems strongly depends on turbulence conditions. While various numerical weather prediction and machine learning models are developed to predict these complex turbulence properties, properly evaluating their added value requires well-defined baseline reference models. This study establishes baseline performance thresholds for key astroclimatic parameters using two distinct models: one forecasting the parameter average over a specific timescale, and the other forecasting the temporal evolution over the same specific timescale. We apply these frameworks to extensive, multi-year datasets from the sites of the Very Large Telescope (VLT) and the Large Binocular Telescope (LBT) and discuss the possibility of extrapolating reference values of forecast performances for other sites based on their optical turbulence statistical characteristics. Our results show that baseline predictive accuracy varies according to the observing site, the specific parameter, the chosen timescale, and the forecasting approach. Therefore, an OT forecasting model's accuracy cannot be quantified in absolute terms, but relatively to the baseline.

astro-ph.IM↗