arXiv · 2610.15574
The Fragility and Dynamics of LLM Pruning-Recovery Steps
Abstract
Structural pruning followed by a recovery stage is the standard recipe for compressing large language models (LLMs), yet the two stages are typically designed and tuned in isolation. In this work, we study how their interaction shapes the compressed model, sweeping ordering, the data that drives each stage, and the alignment of their training objectives. We find that instruction-following is the first capability to collapse under pruning, well before knowledge, reasoning, or core language modeling, and that much of the pruning in-domain loss is likely not knowledge loss but a domain-agnostic failure to respond coherently to the prompt. We find in our setting that in-domain data is the strongest pruning signal, whereas instruction-style data recovers the most. Stage order matters little, but only marginally. We further analyze how the importance ranking drifts before and after pruning. Together these results give practitioners a concrete recipe for composing pruning and recovery.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Luis Frentzen Salim, Komang Rinartha, Chia-Chun Wu, Tran Van Nhiem, Lun-Wei Ku, Yung-Hui Li. 2026-10-11. The Fragility and Dynamics of LLM Pruning-Recovery Steps. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.15574
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.