Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.20733

The dawn of the first galaxies

Abstract

Understanding how the first galaxies assembled their stellar mass at cosmic dawn is a central frontier of modern astrophysics. JWST has now revealed an unexpected population of ultraviolet-bright galaxies at z>10, whose intense emission points towards a rapid stellar mass growth that challenges current models of early galaxy assembly. Yet, the cold gas fueling this growth remains hidden: current ALMA sensitivity restricts routine detection to only the brightest ionized-gas tracers such as [OIII] 88$μ$m, while [CII] 158$μ$m, a key coolant and gas-mass proxy of the neutral interstellar medium (ISM), is undetected beyond $z\sim8$. This leaves fundamental questions unanswered: how quickly primeval galaxies gathered cold gas and turned it into stars; what physical conditions (density, temperature, radiation field) characterized their ISM; how fast metals and dust built up; and how feedback regulated early gas assembly. Only a transformational sub-millimeter facility like ALMA2040 can address these questions, enabling systematic surveys of [CII] in the first galaxies and providing a representative census of gas fractions and depletion times. A simulated galaxy at $z=11.3$ shows that ALMA2040 not only will detect, but also spatially resolve its merging cold-gas structure in [CII] on $\sim$200 pc scales in 5 hours (below 100 pc in 10 hours). ALMA2040 will also spectrally resolve multiple lines simultaneously, akin to integral-field spectroscopy, providing the key diagnostics needed to break density-metallicity-radiation-field degeneracies and map the multi-phase ISM of z>10 galaxies. The combination of dramatically increased line sensitivity and wide instantaneous bandwidth will push the search for the first galaxies out to the earliest cosmic times, with [OIII] detectable up to $z\sim20$. ALMA2040 will thus be transformative for understanding how the first galaxies assembled at cosmic dawn.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Livia Vallini, Tanio Diaz Santos, Belen Alcalde Pampliega, Hiddo Algera, Manuel Aravena, Cecilia Bacchini, Tom Bakx, Maruša Bradač, Leindert A. Boogaard, Karina I. Caputi, Stefano Carniani, Karin Cescon, Francoise Combes, Carla Cornil-Baïotto, Pierre Cox, Elisabete Da Cunha, Roberto Decarli, Miroslava Dessauges-Zavadsky, Andreas L. Faisst, Roman Fernandez Aranda, Andrea Ferrara, Jonathan Freundlich, Yoshinobu Fudamoto, Seiji Fujimoto, Carlotta Gruppioni, Takuya Hashimoto, Natsuki Hayatsu, Kasper E. Heintz, Jacqueline Hodge, Ryota Ikeda, Gareth C. Jones, Mahsa Kohandel, Adarsh Kumar, Alvaro Labiano, Ivanna Langan, Andrea Lapi, Umberto Maio, Marcella Massardi, Dieu D. Nguyen, Andrea Pallottini, Mamta Pandey-Pommier, Miguel Pereira-Santaella, Gergö Popping, Francesca Pozzi, Prachi Prajapati, Dominik A. Riechers, Francesca Rizzo, Lucie Rowland, Sander Schouws, Irene Shivaei, Laura Sommovigo, Yuma Sugahara, Hannah R. Stacey, Sandro Tacchella, Eros Vanzella, Enrico Veraldi, Julie Wardlow, Joris Witstok. 2026-10-14. The dawn of the first galaxies. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.20733

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Using 23 Years of ACS/SBC Data to Understand Backgrounds: Significant Reductions in Expected Background Levels

We have used 23 years of Hubble Space Telescope ACS/SBC data to study what background levels are encountered in practice and how much they vary. The backgrounds vary considerably, with F115LP, F122M, F125LP, PR110L, and PR130L all showing over an order of magnitude of variation in background between observations, apparently due to changes in airglow. The F150LP and F165LP filters, which are dominated by dark rate, not airglow, exhibit a far smaller variation in backgrounds. For the filters where the background is generally dominated by airglow, the backgrounds measured from the data are significantly lower than what the ETC predicts (as of ETC v33.2). The ETC predictions for `average' airglow are greater than the median of our measured background values by factors of 2.51, 2.64, 105, and 3.64, for F115LP, F122M, F125LP, and F140LP, respectively. A preliminary analysis suggests this could be due to certain OI airglow lines usually being fainter than expected by the ETC. With reduced reduced background levels, the shorter-wavelength SBC filters can conduct background-limited observations much more rapidly than had previously been expected. As of ETC v34.1, a new option will be included for SBC calculations, allowing users to employ empirical background percentiles to estimate required exposure times.

astro-ph.IM↗

Using 23 Years of ACS/SBC Data to Understand Backgrounds: Explaining & Predicting Background Variations

Recent analysis of 23 years of Hubble Space Telescope ACS/SBC data has shown that background levels can vary considerably between observations, with most filters showing over an order of magnitude variation. For the shorter-wavelength filters, the background is understood to be dominated by airglow; however, what precisely drives background variations is not well constrained for any filter. Here, we explore the causes of the background variation. Using over 8,000 archival SBC observations, we developed a machine learning model that can accurately predict the background for an observation, based upon a set of 23 observational parameters. This model indicates that, depending on filter, the SBC background is generally dominated by Solar elevation, Solar separation angle, Earth limb angle of observation, SBC temperature, and target Galactic latitude.

astro-ph.IM↗

Beyond the BLUE I: the advantage ceiling - how much can any estimator beat the matched filter in mm/submm survey data?

Papers claiming that convolutional neural networks outperform the matched filter are now common in astronomy. Since that filter is the best linear unbiased estimator (BLUE) for any noise of given covariance, and the minimum-variance unbiased estimator under Gaussian noise, such a claim requires that the noise covariance varies from image to image or the noise is non-Gaussian. We introduce the advantage ceiling eta >= 1, which quantifies both cases: the Fisher information for the amplitude in units of the matched filter's, computable from noise-only simulations before any network is trained, and a bound on the variance of any estimator unbiased at each true amplitude. We compute eta for a suite of millimeter/submillimeter survey noise models and for compact and extended source templates, using a variational score-matching ladder whose rungs are estimator classes of increasing statistical order, from linear to convolutional. With an instrumental white-noise floor, Gaussian noise returns eta = 0.94-1.06 (+-0.04); covariance mixtures give exact ceilings of 10.2 (spectral tilt, extended source), 2.1 (leaked components) and 1.1-1.8 otherwise; residual artifacts give eta <= 1.09. Source confusion gives the largest advantage, eta >= 3.8 (extended) and >= 2.4 (compact). Three unmodelled channels - a zeroed DC mode, a missing white floor and floating-point rounding - can manufacture spurious advantages of up to two orders of magnitude. A ResNet regressor is 6-15% less efficient than the matched filter on Gaussian noise once prior shrinkage is divided out, and realizes a factor 1.8 of the 10.2 available on the spectral-tilt mixture; a companion paper tests such regressors against these ceilings.

astro-ph.IM↗