Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.20955

Probing Neural Audio Codecs with Speaker Traits and Speech Characteristics

Abstract

Neural audio codecs are increasingly used for low-bitrate speech coding and serve as tokenizers for speech language models, yet it remains unclear how their codebook hierarchies encode speaker traits and speech characteristics. We systematically study 17 multi-codebook neural audio codecs across seven traits: sex, age, accent, voice quality, emotion, speech flow, and non-verbal sounds. For each codec, we reconstruct speech using partial codebooks and use machine listeners to compare trait predictions on each reconstruction. We measure prediction agreement with reweighted Cohen's \k{appa}, and define trait depth as a proxy for the codebook depth by which each trait is encoded and recoverable. Overall, sex has the shallowest trait depth, followed by speech flow, whereas voice quality and age group require deeper stacks; emotion, accent, and non-verbal sounds fall in between. Within each trait, speech-flow classes are at relatively similar trait depths, whereas emotion, accent, and non-verbal sounds differ more. Additionally, we explore how certain codec design choices relate to trait depths. These findings show that codebook hierarchies are trait-dependent and may not exhibit uniform coarse-to-fine structures, motivating trait-specific codec evaluation and design for future applications.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Jihwan Lee, Tiantian Feng, Minu Kim, Junhyeok Lee, Sean Foley, Thanathai Lertpetchpun, Najim Dehak, Dani Byrd, Shrikanth Narayanan. 2026-10-14. Probing Neural Audio Codecs with Speaker Traits and Speech Characteristics. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.20955

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

NVV-Locator: From Transcript Tags to Acoustic Boundaries for Fine-Grained Nonverbal Vocalization Grounding

Human speech includes nonverbal vocalizations (NVVs), such as laughter, sighs, breaths, and coughs, which convey affective and interactional information. Existing approaches typically represent NVVs as transcript-level tags, providing limited supervision for their waveform-time boundaries. We present NVV-Locator for fine-grained NVV temporal grounding. We first unify 26 NVV categories across public resources and construct large-scale timestamp-supervised training data through dual-LLM verification, transcript-guided forced alignment, and energy-based boundary refinement. We further introduce NVV-TimeBench, an expert-refined benchmark with 667 utterances and 1,094 events. NVV-Locator uses a non-autoregressive slot-filling architecture to jointly predict lexical timestamps, NVV categories, and event boundaries. On NVV-TimeBench, it achieves 71.0% Micro F1, 70.2% Macro F1, 80.4% Macro mIoU, and 59.6 ms Macro mMAE, outperforming the evaluated large audio model counterparts. Evaluation on an external corpus further demonstrates the cross-corpus generalization of NVV-Locator.

eess.AS↗

Attendance-guided speaker enrollment across meetings

Speaker-aware applications rely on enrolled voice profiles, yet collecting enrollment speech from every participant is impractical. Meeting archives provide an alternative source of enrollment speech, comprising recordings of recurring participants paired with expected attendance lists. We investigate whether expected attendance lists can be cross-referenced with diarized anonymous speaker clusters to identify reliable enrollment speech for recurring participants. The resulting task, multi-participant automatic enrollment, must accommodate two types of attendance noise: a listed participant may not speak, and a speaker may be unlisted. To this end, we introduce a benchmark for the task: a synthetic corpus calibrated to an in-house meeting corpus, paired with a contamination-sensitive evaluation protocol. The reference method we introduce scores cross-session cluster chains against expected-attendance patterns and abstains when the evidence is insufficient. We quantify the reference method's benchmark performance as a trade-off between enrollment success and contamination. Applying synthetic-development thresholds unchanged to real meetings exposes a synthetic-to-real gap that remains an open challenge. We will release the benchmark generator and evaluation code.

eess.AS↗

VeriSpoof: Beyond Real or Fake with One Audio LLM

A speech deepfake detector estimates whether a recording is synthetic, but a forensic analyst also asks which system produced it, whether recordings share a source, and what evidence supports each conclusion. We present VeriSpoof, an audio language model that unifies five tasks with shared weights: deepfake detection, generator attribution (generator, acoustic model and vocoder), recording-condition analysis, synthesized-span localisation, and source verification. Each decision is supported by grounded rationales whose statements can be independently verified. Answers are scored by sentence likelihood, allowing detection and source verification to be thresholded without separate heads. Rationale statements can be checked against waveform measurements, span labels, or generator metadata. Counterfactual examples train decisions to follow the stated evidence. Across the 14 Speech-DF-Arena test sets, VeriSpoof-Plus achieves 2.14% pooled EER, ranking third of 28 systems and first among open-weight systems. VeriSpoof-Base, trained only on official training splits of eight corpora, achieves 4.43% EER, less than half that of the next open-weight detector. With the same weights, VeriSpoof-Plus verifies whether recordings from generators unseen in training share a source at 6.2% EER. Controlled studies show that the audio representation governs detection, the LLM governs recording comparison, and source supervision is necessary for neural-codec fakes. Statement-checkable rationales catch partial fakes missed by one-step answers (99.6% vs. 78.4% on PartialEdit) and determine decisions under edits unseen in training (99.5%). Training updates only 29.7M of 2.85B parameters, fitting a single 24 GB GPU with gradient checkpointing. We release both models, inference code, a demo, and VeriSpoof-Bench, the evaluation suite covering these questions.

eess.AS↗