Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.23006

Efficient CPU-GPU collaborative MoE inference via Adaptive Expert Assignment

Abstract

Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models reduce inference computation through sparse expert activation, but their large expert memory footprint often exceeds GPU capacity, making expert offloading necessary for memory-constrained inference. However, existing systems typically handle GPU-missed experts by either transferring them to the GPU, incurring substantial PCIe transfer latency, or executing them on the CPU, making the slower CPU computation the bottleneck. To address these limitations, we present \method, a CPU-GPU collaborative MoE inference system that adaptively assigns these missed experts to the CPU or GPU for efficient execution. By exploiting differences in expert token-loads, \method selectively transfers high-load experts to the GPU while executing low-load experts on the CPU. To minimize inference latency, \method adaptively adjusts expert assignments to balance the CPU computation path against the GPU transfer-and-computation path, allowing both execution paths to complete as early as possible. Extensive experiments on three representative MoE LLMs show that \method improves prefill speed by up to 51.9\% and decode throughput by up to 39.5\% over the strongest baseline across the evaluated batch sizes, with consistent gains under different GPU-memory budgets.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Wenhui Lv, Yunming Liao, Hongli Xu, Yang Xu, Junhao Cheng. 2026-10-16. Efficient CPU-GPU collaborative MoE inference via Adaptive Expert Assignment. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.23006

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

GVPO: Group Variance Policy Optimization for Large Language Model Post-Training

Post-training plays a crucial role in refining and aligning large language models to meet specific tasks and human preferences. While recent advancements in post-training techniques, such as Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO), leverage increased sampling with relative reward scoring to achieve superior performance, these methods often suffer from training instability that limits their practical adoption. As a next step, we present Group Variance Policy Optimization (GVPO). GVPO incorporates the analytical solution to KL-constrained reward maximization directly into its gradient weights, ensuring alignment with the optimal policy. The method provides intuitive physical interpretations: its gradient mirrors the mean squared error between the central distance of implicit rewards and that of actual rewards. GVPO offers two key advantages: (1) it guarantees a unique optimal solution, exactly the KL-constrained reward maximization objective, (2) it supports flexible sampling distributions that avoids on-policy and importance sampling limitations. By unifying theoretical guarantees with practical adaptability, GVPO establishes a new paradigm for reliable and versatile LLM post-training.

cs.AI↗

NEXUS: Learning Safety Constraints and Action Models for Safe and Robust Embodied Planning

Large language models (LLMs) enable embodied agents to plan from naturallanguage instructions, yet their actions may be physically infeasible or hazardous. Existing neuro-symbolic learners primarily refine execution models, while formal safety methods acquire or enforce safety constraints. This separation limits the reuse of both execution corrections and safety knowledge across tasks. We present NEXUS, a modular neuro-symbolic framework that jointly maintains a PDDL domain model and an LTL safety specification. Execution failures are used to repair action schemas, whereas detected hazards are converted into reusable LTL constraints through hierarchical semantic and translation sampling with equivalence consensus. Accumulated constraints are enforced through LTL progression during symbolic search; comparing constrained and unconstrained search outcomes distinguishes physical unreachability from safety-induced refusal. Experiments on SafeAgentBench evaluation set show that NEXUS achieves the best overall trade-off between safetask completion and unsafe-task refusal, while maintaining low violation rates under jailbreak attacks. Ablations confirm the complementary benefits of PDDLdomain refinement and LTL-constraint accumulation.

cs.AI↗

APeB: Benchmarking Personalization Ability of Large Language Model Agents

LLM-powered agents struggle with personalization when users issue raw, underspecified queries. In this setting, agents must infer latent intent, extract preferences from noisy interaction histories, and select among competing alternatives. Existing benchmarks rarely test this capability, as they often rely on user-refined queries or simplified histories. We introduce personalized product search (PPS), a testbed for agentic personalization under raw queries and diverse histories. We construct Agent Personalized Benchmark (APeB) from action logs, pairing underspecified intents with rich histories and user-viewed candidate items. Evaluating state-of-the-art LLMs with multi-step agent workflows, we find that models handle explicit queries well but struggle with early-stage queries requiring intent and preference discovery. Rubric analysis attributes this gap mainly to ineffective history use. A simple history-aware query-refinement pipeline, VQRA, yields consistent gains, highlighting the need for dedicated history-utilization modules in personalized agents.

cs.AI↗