Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.23735

LagNet: Lag-Structured Operators for Long-Term Time Series Forecasting

Abstract

Long-term time series forecasting maps a finite history window to an extended future horizon. Many existing models focus primarily on the design of input representations and model structures, while paying less attention to the structural form of the history-to-future forecasting operator itself. We examine this operator directly and find that, across model families, sensitivity matrices exhibit recurring diagonal patterns whose diagonals correspond to relative temporal lags. Motivated by this observation, we develop a framework for direct multi-step forecasting based on lag-structured temporal operators. Its basic building block, LagLayer, constructs a Toeplitz matrix by tying history-to-future connections with the same relative lag and incorporates horizon-wise and history-wise scaling coefficients to relax exact sharing. This design enables LagLayer to serve as an effective replacement for temporal linear layers in existing forecasting models. Stacking LagLayer modules with activations and multiple feature maps yields LagNet. Experiments on long-term time series forecasting benchmarks show that our method is competitive with strong baselines, while sensitivity matrix diagnostics and limited-data experiments demonstrate that LagLayer provides an effective and sample-efficient alternative to a linear layer.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Zhenan Yu, Guangxin Jiang, Jiuyun Jiang, Jin Yang. 2026-10-16. LagNet: Lag-Structured Operators for Long-Term Time Series Forecasting. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.23735

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Is the Policy Gradient a Gradient?

The policy gradient theorem describes the gradient of the expected discounted return with respect to an agent's policy parameters. However, many policy gradient methods omit the outer discount factor, yielding an update that need not equal the gradient of the discounted objective. Is the resulting update the gradient of another objective? This has been an open question for several years, and this lack of theoretical clarity has led to an abundance of misstatements in the literature. We answer this question for the resulting episode-summed, on-policy update by proving that it need not equal the gradient of any function. Further, we construct a counterexample in which exact expected updates drive the policy toward a deterministic limit that is globally pessimal with respect to both the discounted and undiscounted objectives, while the parameter diverges. We motivate this work by surveying the literature and showing that there remains a widespread misunderstanding regarding discounted policy gradient methods, with errors present even in highly-cited papers published at top conferences.

cs.LG↗

Harnessing Trust in Directed Graphs: Redefining Robustness of Graph Learning

Existing research on robust Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) focuses predominantly on undirected graphs, overlooking the trustworthiness inherent in the link directions of directed graphs. In this work, we analyze the limitations of current approaches from both the attack and defense perspectives and redefine the robustness of GNNs in directed graphs. From the attack side, we introduce a more realistic directed graph attack setting that addresses the shortcomings of existing attacks. From the defense side, we propose a simple yet effective message-passing framework that serves as a plug-in layer to strengthen GNN robustness while avoiding a false sense of robustness. Our findings show that the trust signals encoded in directed graphs can be harnessed to substantially improve the robustness of GNNs. When combined with existing defense strategies, the framework achieves state-of-the-art robust performance alongside strong clean accuracy against both transfer and adaptive attacks. These results point to a novel and promising direction for strengthening the robustness of graph deep learning.

cs.LG↗

Two Minds Better Than One: Collaborative Reward Modeling for LLM Alignment

Reward models (RMs) are central to aligning large language models (LLMs) with human values, yet noisy preference feedback can induce reward misgeneralization through spurious correlations and overfitting. We characterize the training dynamics of preference pairs and uncover a distinctive optimization signature of noise: persistently high losses, sharp temporal fluctuations, and irregular gradient updates. Our analyses further show that excluding such pairs improves downstream alignment. In practice, however, reliable preferences are not known a priori, and self-filtering based on a model's own training signals can amplify confirmation bias. To address this challenge, we introduce Collaborative Reward Modeling (CRM), an online framework for identifying reliable preferences. CRM couples cross-model peer review with curriculum learning: two RMs evaluate each other's sample selections, while curriculum keeps their learning progress synchronized. Across extensive experiments, CRM improves RM generalization by up to 9.94 points on RewardBench under 40% preference noise. CRM further generalizes to implicit-reward alignment, offering a robust and broadly applicable approach to learning from imperfect feedback.

cs.LG↗