Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.27527

Frozen colorings and recolorability of blowups

Abstract

The $k$-reconfiguration graph $R_k(G)$ of the proper $k$-colorings of a graph $G$ is the graph whose vertices are the $k$-colorings of $G$, with an edge between two colorings if they differ on exactly one vertex. A graph $G$ is recolorable if $R_k(G)$ is connected for all $k \ge χ(G) + 1$. In this paper, we study recolorability under blowups through frozen colorings, here blowup means replacing vertices with non-empty cliques. We characterize frozen colorings of a blowup of $G$ in terms of maximal independent sets of the base graph, and develop a lifting principle that transfers suitable frozen obstructions from an induced subgraph to a blowup of the ambient graph. This framework yields several consequences. In particular, we answer negatively a question of Belavadi, Cameron and Sintiari on recoloring via modular decomposition, and disprove their conjecture on blowups of prime graphs. We further determine exactly which cycles have all blowups recolorable: this holds for $C_n$ if and only if $n\in\{3,4,5,7\}$. The frozen obstructions arising from the negative cases, together with the lifting principle, imply that if every blowup of a graph $G$ is recolorable, then every induced hole of $G$ has length $4$, $5$, or $7$. Finally, using linear programming duality, we show that every such graph $G$ is fractionally co-strongly perfect.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Tianyu Huang, Yulai Ma, Jiaqi Zhang. 2026-10-20. Frozen colorings and recolorability of blowups. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.27527

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Domination in Johnson graphs J(n, 3) for odd n

In 2025 Cornet, Dravec, and Torres determined the domination number $γ(J(n,3))$ of the Johnson graph for every even $n \ge 6$, expressing it as a closed form $ϕ_n$ in terms of Fort-Hedlund covering numbers, and conjectured the same value for odd $n$. We prove this conjecture: $γ(J(n,3)) = ϕ_n$ for every odd $n \ge 7$. A dominating set of $J(n,3)$ is the same as a lotto design $\mathrm{LD}(n,3,3,2)$, and the lotto numbers $L(n,3,3,2)$, and hence $γ(J(n,3))$, were already determined for every $n$ by Bate (1978) and by Brouwer (1981); a short degree argument of Füredi, Székely, and Zubor (1996) gives the same lower bound for all $n \not\equiv 9, 10 \pmod{12}$. The contribution of this paper is therefore a new proof of the odd case, carried out within the bijective framework of Cornet, Dravec, and Torres.

math.CO↗

HJ numbers revisited

Hales-Jewett theorem is well known. We prove a primitive recursive bound, in fact an $\clE^5$ one, for the density version. In preparation we deal with what was the main induction step in the old proof of Hales-Jewett as a result in its own right with better bounds. Also in improving our bounds.

math.CO↗

Adjacency-degree algebras and spectral determination of graphs

Let $G$ be a graph with adjacency matrix $A$ and degree matrix $D$. Applying $A$ and $D$ repeatedly to the all-ones vector produces a space $M_G$ of functions on the vertices, and these functions are constant on the orbits of the automorphism group. We call $G$ AD-observable if $M_G$ contains the indicator vector of every orbit, and AD-separable if the functions in $M_G$ separate the orbits. Forests are AD-observable, by McKay's leaf-pruning argument. Our main result is that for every cograph, $M_G$ is spanned by the indicator vectors of the cells of the stable partition of color refinement. Hence a cograph is AD-observable, or equivalently AD-separable, exactly when color refinement finds its orbits, and we describe these cographs by their cotrees. We also show that two cographs with the same number of vertices and the same homomorphism counts from all caterpillars have the same counts from all trees. The main result does not extend to distance-hereditary graphs: we give two such graphs on nine vertices that are AD-separable but not AD-observable.

math.CO↗