Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.37469

Who Shaped What? Untangling Human and AI Creative Contributions Through Spatial Provenance in Image Editing

Riya Sahni·Christine Dierk·Lydia Chilton·Eunyee Koh·Doga Dogan·Tongyu Zhou
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Images co-edited with AI are often labeled to disclose AI use. However, creators feel these labels do not sufficiently describe their contributions to the editing process. Editing histories preserve requests, suggestions, and revisions, but how do creators use these logs to judge contribution? We investigated this with Roop, a mixed-initiative design probe that links image regions to editing histories (spatial provenance) and summarizes interactions in a heat map. Twenty participants edited images, annotated human and AI contributions, then reviewed the spatial provenance heat map. Participants credited themselves for directing changes while crediting AI for determining visual details. They judged contribution partly by whether their interactions achieved their intentions. Reviewing provenance helped participants remember interactions without always changing whom they credited. These findings motivate provenance systems that preserve enough context for creators to explain how interactions shaped their work, alongside the record of what happened.

Explore related subjects

cs.HC

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Riya Sahni, Christine Dierk, Lydia Chilton, Eunyee Koh, Doga Dogan, Tongyu Zhou. 2026-10-27. Who Shaped What? Untangling Human and AI Creative Contributions Through Spatial Provenance in Image Editing. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.37469

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

How K-12 Teachers Adapt Generative AI to Local Classroom Demands: Cultural Distance Between GenAI Defaults and Everyday Teaching Practices

Generative AI (GenAI) is entering K-12 classrooms, but its default culture does not always fit local teaching. Existing accounts either treat this misfit as macro-level structural bias or examine it through single-case studies; neither captures how much work teachers must do to make outputs usable across tasks. This exploratory, theory-building qualitative study introduces cultural distance, the gap between GenAI's default cultural repertoire and the situated demands of teachers' practice. Through interviews with 30 K-12 teachers who frequently use GenAI, 10 each from South Africa, Taiwan, and the United States, we identified three levels defined by the effort teachers invested and whether it yielded a usable output: low (minor edits), mid (sustained prompting and revision), and high (structural gaps rooted in unsupported languages, undigitized knowledge, or policy filters that no teacher effort can close). We present cultural distance as a promising framework requiring further examination and draw implications for designers, policymakers, and educators.

cs.HC↗
arXiv2026

Beyond Checklist Compliance: A Tale of the Accessibility-Usability Dilemma across Government and Non-Government Web Systems in Bangladesh

Examining whether technical accessibility measures align with users' usability experiences across web systems in Bangladesh is of utmost significance, given the country's rapidly expanding digital ecosystem. We, therefore, evaluated 207 web systems using WAVE, AChecks, and Squidler and surveyed 103 young adult users. Automated evaluation revealed mixed patterns across government and non-government sectors, with neither consistently performing better across accessibility, functionality, web practices, and performance. In contrast, participants clearly favored non-government platforms for navigation, usability, clarity, and cross-device experience. Qualitative analysis identified three barriers to practical access: system instability disrupting task completion, interaction and navigational friction, and socio-technical barriers involving information access, service continuity, and trust. These findings show that automated accessibility measures capture only part of users' experiences. Accessible web services therefore require attention beyond detectable accessibility problems to reliable task progression, understandable interaction, information access, and continuity across the broader service process.

cs.HC↗
arXiv2026

AffectGPT-RL: Revealing Roles of Reinforcement Learning in Open-Vocabulary Emotion Recognition

Open-Vocabulary Multimodal Emotion Recognition (OV-MER) aims to predict emotions without being constrained by predefined label spaces, thereby enabling fine-grained emotion understanding. Unlike traditional discriminative methods, OV-MER leverages generative models to capture the full spectrum of emotions and employs emotion wheels (EWs) for metric calculation. Previous approaches primarily rely on token-level loss during training. However, this objective is misaligned with the metrics used in OV-MER, and these metrics cannot be directly optimized via gradient backpropagation. To address this limitation, we turn our attention to reinforcement learning, as this strategy can optimize non-differentiable objectives. We term this framework AffectGPT-RL. Furthermore, we conduct extensive experiments to elucidate the role of reinforcement learning in this task, revealing the necessity of the reasoning process, the impact of different rewards, and the generalizability to other emotion tasks such as sentiment analysis and basic emotion recognition. Experimental results demonstrate that AffectGPT-RL yields significant performance improvements on OV-MER. Beyond this task, we also achieve remarkable performance gains on basic emotion recognition, attaining state-of-the-art results on MER-UniBench. To the best of our knowledge, this is the pioneering work exploring the role of reinforcement learning in OV-MER, providing valuable guidance for subsequent researchers. Our code is provided at: https://github.com/zeroQiaoba/AffectGPT/tree/master/AffectGPT-RL.

cs.HC↗