Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2611.01929

Watch Your Step: Adam's Margin Maximization Bias Depends on the Learning Rate Schedule

Abstract

We study the implicit bias of Adam and its similarity to sign gradient descent on homogeneous models in binary classification tasks. Perhaps surprisingly, we uncover that these depend on the learning rate schedule. While previous works studied strongly decaying learning rate schedules $η(t)=\mathrm o \left(t^{1/L-1}\right)$, where $L$ is the homogeneity degree, and showed $\ell_\infty$-margin-maximization biases, we focus on the more common complementary regime, including constant and weakly decaying schedules. For a polynomial schedule $t^α$ and homogeneity degree $L$, we show that when $α> \frac 1L - \frac12$, Adam has no trajectory-independent margin-maximization bias for deep linear networks (in the KKT sense): first, there is no non-trivial, locally Lipschitz, convex implicit regularizer in this setting, including any squared norm. Second, on width-$1$ networks, the result holds without requiring convexity, implying that any implicit regularizer for wide networks must be trivial when restricted to a width-$1$ network. Nevertheless, we positively characterize the implicit bias in this regime as maximizing a trajectory-dependent weighted-$\ell_2$ margin for any $L$-homogeneous model. The fundamental mechanism behind our results is convergence of Adam's preconditioner to a trajectory-dependent vector, which also allows showing that the limiting parameter direction depends on initialization. In the intermediate regime $\frac 1L - 1 \leq α\leq \frac1L - \frac12$ we prove an $\ell_\infty$ bias, conditional on gradient directional convergence to a full-support vector. Of independent interest, we establish a loss decay rate for full batch Adam on general homogeneous models, whose leading order depends only on the second-moment parameter.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Eitan Gronich, Gal Vardi. 2026-11-01. Watch Your Step: Adam's Margin Maximization Bias Depends on the Learning Rate Schedule. https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.01929

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Subspace Node Pruning

Node pruning is the art of removing computational units such as neurons, filters, attention heads, or even entire layers to significantly reduce inference time while retaining network performance. In this work, we show that a broad family of importance measures, from activation-based to Fisher-based, share a common quadratic form. Through a lower-triangular change of basis, this form yields a pruning subspace in which entire nodes can be removed while the impact of the lost units is simultaneously recovered via linear least squares. Furthermore, the importance measures within our subspace are decoupled and additive through an orthogonalization of the layer activations, allowing multi-node pruning within layers without interference between importance scores. Our method, Subspace Node Pruning (SNP), outperforms the compared baselines on VGG-16 and ResNet-50 on ImageNet. On OPT-125M and LLaMA-2 7B, SNP matches the state-of-the-art LLM Surgeon at a 40-shot schedule and outperforms it whenever fewer shots are used, all without any retraining after pruning.

cs.LG↗

On the growth of the parameters of approximating ReLU neural networks

This work focuses on the analysis of fully connected feed forward ReLU neural networks as they approximate a given, smooth function. In contrast to conventionally studied universal approximation properties under increasing architectures, e.g., in terms of width or depth of the networks, we are concerned with the asymptotic growth of the parameters of approximating networks. Such results are of interest, e.g., for error analysis or consistency results for neural network training. The main result of our work is that, for a ReLU architecture with state of the art approximation error, the realizing parameters grow at most polynomially. The obtained rate with respect to a normalized network size is compared to existing results and is shown to be superior in most cases, in particular for high dimensional input.

cs.LG↗

Correlations Are Ruining Your Gradient Descent

Natural gradient descent, and the preconditioned optimizers which have followed from it, correct gradient descent by estimating curvature and applying its inverse to the gradient. For any single layer of a deep neural network, this correction can be shown to approximately separate into two factors: one which accounts for correlations in the gradient signal, and one which accounts for correlations in the data arriving at that layer. Herein we show that this second factor can be expressed as a change of basis rather than of curvature and, considered thus, it can be removed from the optimizer entirely and placed within the network itself. Specifically, we show that, once forward weights are corrected, right-sided natural gradient descent can be implemented in a form which has three exactly equivalent forms: a gradient preconditioner, a decorrelating linear transform in the forward pass, or a set of recurrent dynamics in which all updates are Hebbian and rely only upon locally available signals. The (recurrent) decorrelation method we discover aligns closely with proposed methods for inhibitory learning and homeostatic plasticity in the brain. Notably, our transform requires no matrix inverse, no matrix decomposition, and no information beyond that which is available at an individual synapse. It can therefore be applied in distributed and physically constrained systems, including neuromorphic hardware and nervous systems, where existing preconditioners cannot. We demonstrate its effectiveness empirically in convolutional and residual network models while significantly improving a range of approximate biologically plausible methods for credit assignment.

cs.LG↗