Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Eitan Gronich

Publications and source records attributed to Eitan Gronich.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Watch Your Step: Adam's Margin Maximization Bias Depends on the Learning Rate Schedule

We study the implicit bias of Adam and its similarity to sign gradient descent on homogeneous models in binary classification tasks. Perhaps surprisingly, we uncover that these depend on the learning rate schedule. While previous works studied strongly decaying learning rate schedules $η(t)=\mathrm o \left(t^{1/L-1}\right)$, where $L$ is the homogeneity degree, and showed $\ell_\infty$-margin-maximization biases, we focus on the more common complementary regime, including constant and weakly decaying schedules. For a polynomial schedule $t^α$ and homogeneity degree $L$, we show that when $α> \frac 1L - \frac12$, Adam has no trajectory-independent margin-maximization bias for deep linear networks (in the KKT sense): first, there is no non-trivial, locally Lipschitz, convex implicit regularizer in this setting, including any squared norm. Second, on width-$1$ networks, the result holds without requiring convexity, implying that any implicit regularizer for wide networks must be trivial when restricted to a width-$1$ network. Nevertheless, we positively characterize the implicit bias in this regime as maximizing a trajectory-dependent weighted-$\ell_2$ margin for any $L$-homogeneous model. The fundamental mechanism behind our results is convergence of Adam's preconditioner to a trajectory-dependent vector, which also allows showing that the limiting parameter direction depends on initialization. In the intermediate regime $\frac 1L - 1 \leq α\leq \frac1L - \frac12$ we prove an $\ell_\infty$ bias, conditional on gradient directional convergence to a full-support vector. Of independent interest, we establish a loss decay rate for full batch Adam on general homogeneous models, whose leading order depends only on the second-moment parameter.

cs.LG↗

The Implicit Bias of Adam and Muon on Smooth Homogeneous Neural Networks

We study the implicit bias of momentum-based optimizers on smooth homogeneous models. We show that \textit{momentum steepest descent} algorithms like Muon (spectral norm), MomentumGD ($\ell_2$ norm), and Signum ($\ell_\infty$ norm) are \textit{approximate} steepest descent trajectories under a decaying learning rate schedule, proving that these algorithms have a bias towards KKT points of the corresponding margin maximization problem. We extend the analysis to Adam (without the stability constant), which maximizes the $\ell_\infty$ margin, and to Muon-Signum and Muon-Adam, which maximize a hybrid norm. Our experiments corroborate the theory and show that the identity of the margin maximized depends on the choice of optimizer. Overall, our results extend earlier lines of work on steepest descent in homogeneous models and momentum-based optimizers in linear models.

cs.LG↗

Flavors of Margin: Implicit Bias of Steepest Descent in Homogeneous Neural Networks

We study the implicit bias of the general family of steepest descent algorithms with infinitesimal learning rate in deep homogeneous neural networks. We show that: (a) an algorithm-dependent geometric margin starts increasing once the networks reach perfect training accuracy, and (b) any limit point of the training trajectory corresponds to a KKT point of the corresponding margin-maximization problem. We experimentally zoom into the trajectories of neural networks optimized with various steepest descent algorithms, highlighting connections to the implicit bias of popular adaptive methods (Adam and Shampoo).

cs.LG↗

Querying Kernel Methods Suffices for Reconstructing their Training Data

Over-parameterized models have raised concerns about their potential to memorize training data, even when achieving strong generalization. The privacy implications of such memorization are generally unclear, particularly in scenarios where only model outputs are accessible. We study this question in the context of kernel methods, and demonstrate both empirically and theoretically that querying kernel models at various points suffices to reconstruct their training data, even without access to model parameters. Our results hold for a range of kernel methods, including kernel regression, support vector machines, and kernel density estimation. Our hope is that this work can illuminate potential privacy concerns for such models.

cs.LG↗