Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2611.02240

When to Probe and When to Act: Clarity-Aware Risk-Adaptive Control for Interactive Driving

Youran Wang·Devodita Chakravarty·Yiwei Lyu
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Safe navigation in interactive traffic requires autonomous vehicles to reason about unobservable human characteristics and the reciprocal nature of multi-agent interactions. Traditional architectures often decouple prediction from planning, leading to the "Frozen Robot Problem" or unsafe maneuvers under high ambiguity because they treat risk assessment and information acquisition as independent objectives. We argue that the notion of safety should not remain static but must instead dynamically co-evolve with the system's internal confidence: the robot should actively clarify ambiguity when necessary while also recognizing the diminishing returns of information, and naturally transition toward task execution. We introduce a unified belief-space Model Predictive Control (MPC) framework that couples multistep information planning with a clarity-adaptive Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) barrier mechanism. By treating clarity, a scalar informational state, as an explicit planning variable, the controller co-designs its probing strategy with its safety specification, tightening conservatism under high ambiguity and relaxing constraints as confidence improves. We further provide a performance analysis showing that the cost of information seeking and the expected planning-cost gap to a controller that knows the true human characteristic are bounded by residual ambiguity and solver error. We evaluate the framework in lane-merging and unsignalized-intersection scenarios against representative interactive-planning baselines. Across 5,000 simulations, the proposed method achieves the highest success rates (94.6% and 93.2%) and the lowest collision rates (1.2% and 1.4%) among the compared methods, providing a principled foundation for robust decision-making in human-centric environments.

Explore related subjects

cs.RO

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Youran Wang, Devodita Chakravarty, Yiwei Lyu. 2026-11-01. When to Probe and When to Act: Clarity-Aware Risk-Adaptive Control for Interactive Driving. https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.02240

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Design of an Underwater Vehicle With Orientation-Adjustable Thrusters and Adaptive Tracking Control

Unmanned underwater vehicles (UUVs) are essential for marine exploration and research. However, conventional designs often struggle with limited maneuverability in complex and dynamic underwater environments. This paper presents an orientation-adjustable thruster UUV (OAT-UUV) with vector thrusters, enabling full six-degree-of-freedom (6-DOF) motion. and composite maneuvers. To overcome challenges associated with uncertain model parameters and environmental disturbances, a vision-based tracking control system based on a novel feedforward adaptive model predictive controller (FF-AMPC) is proposed to achieve robust object tracking, which integrates realtime state feedback with adaptive parameter updating. Extensive experiments, including closed-loop tracking and composite motion tests in real-world environment, have been conducted. The obtained results demonstrate that the orientation-adjustable propulsion design significantly improves the underwater maneuverability, while the FF-AMPC controller achieves a 49.1% hovering improvement compared to conventional controller.

cs.RO↗
arXiv2026

FlowDrive: moderated flow matching with data balancing for trajectory planning

Learning-based planners are sensitive to the long-tailed distribution of driving data. Common maneuvers dominate datasets, while dangerous or rare scenarios are sparse. This imbalance can bias models toward the frequent cases and degrade performance on critical scenarios. To tackle this problem, we compare balancing strategies for sampling training data and find reweighting by trajectory pattern an effective approach. We then present FlowDrive, a flow-matching trajectory planner that learns a conditional rectified flow to map noise directly to trajectory distributions with few flow-matching steps. We further introduce moderated, in-the-loop guidance that injects small perturbation between flow steps to systematically increase trajectory diversity while remaining scene-consistent. On nuPlan and the interaction-focused interPlan benchmarks, FlowDrive achieves state-of-the-art results among learning-based planners and approaches methods with rule-based refinements. After adding moderated guidance and light post-processing (FlowDrive*), it achieves overall state-of-the-art performance across nearly all benchmark splits. Our code is available at https://github.com/einsteinguang/flow_drive_planner.

cs.RO↗
arXiv2026

DexCanvas: Bridging Human Demonstrations and Robot Learning for Dexterous Manipulation

A dexterous hand succeeds or fails through contact, yet every scalable record of human manipulation (video, vision-based hand tracking, motion capture) observes how the hand moves and misses how it pushes. We present DexCanvas, a hybrid real-synthetic dataset of 7,000 hours of dexterous hand-object interaction with per-frame contact points and contact forces, grown from 70 hours of optical motion capture that spans 21 manipulation types, from power and precision grasps to in-hand manipulation. The forces come from a real-to-sim pipeline: one reinforcement learning (RL) policy, conditioned on object geometry and manipulation type, drives an actuated MANO hand in physics simulation to reproduce each captured object trajectory, and the simulator measures the contacts that produce the reproduced motion. The policy reproduces 87.5% of the demonstrations and still succeeds on 80.9% of rollouts from perturbed initial object poses; these perturbed rollouts expand the 70 captured hours a hundredfold. On six YCB objects absent from the capture set it succeeds 72.5% of the time. The contact channels make better policies: a Diffusion Policy that observes DexCanvas contact features succeeds 82.2% of the time, against 67.5% without them, over 18,522 trials. Contact-driven retargeting carries the same demonstrations to two dexterous robot hands, where the RL stage again produces stable rollouts. A first release of 111,857 force-annotated trajectories is publicly available on Hugging Face.

cs.RO↗