Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2611.03246

A Common Language for Dynamic Graphs: Interaction Tokenization Enables Foundation Models

Abstract

Dynamic graphs capture evolving interactions in Web systems, including online communication, user engagement, and recommendation. Graph foundation models aim to reuse predictive capabilities across networks, but extending this capability to dynamic graphs faces two challenges. First, node identities are graph-specific, and similar interaction patterns can appear at different temporal and activity scales, making histories difficult to represent consistently across networks. Second, the predictive roles of historical patterns vary across interaction dynamics, limiting transfer from a narrow range of training processes. In this paper, we show that a common interaction language, combined with learning across diverse interaction processes, offers a basis for dynamic graph foundation modeling. We propose CL-DGFM, a Common Language Dynamic Graph Foundation Model for temporal link prediction. Its Dynamic Interaction Tokenizer encodes interaction memory, historical connectivity, and ordered destination transitions into calibrated tabular inputs, making dynamic histories accessible to existing predictors without an additional trainable graph encoder. Its Dynamic Interaction Prior trains a pretrained tabular foundation predictor across diverse synthetic dynamics. Labeled historical context guides prediction, with a Contextual Value Adapter modulating attention values. The model transfers to real graphs without target-graph parameter updates. Experiments on TGB and TGB-Seq demonstrate competitive performance. Further comparisons show that the common language supports basic machine learning and neural models, and enables direct use of frozen tabular foundation models on dynamic graphs.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Fuyuan Ma, Yili Wang, Xin He, Xin Zhang, Ying Wang, Xin Wang. 2026-11-02. A Common Language for Dynamic Graphs: Interaction Tokenization Enables Foundation Models. https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.03246

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Subspace Node Pruning

Node pruning is the art of removing computational units such as neurons, filters, attention heads, or even entire layers to significantly reduce inference time while retaining network performance. In this work, we show that a broad family of importance measures, from activation-based to Fisher-based, share a common quadratic form. Through a lower-triangular change of basis, this form yields a pruning subspace in which entire nodes can be removed while the impact of the lost units is simultaneously recovered via linear least squares. Furthermore, the importance measures within our subspace are decoupled and additive through an orthogonalization of the layer activations, allowing multi-node pruning within layers without interference between importance scores. Our method, Subspace Node Pruning (SNP), outperforms the compared baselines on VGG-16 and ResNet-50 on ImageNet. On OPT-125M and LLaMA-2 7B, SNP matches the state-of-the-art LLM Surgeon at a 40-shot schedule and outperforms it whenever fewer shots are used, all without any retraining after pruning.

cs.LG↗

On the growth of the parameters of approximating ReLU neural networks

This work focuses on the analysis of fully connected feed forward ReLU neural networks as they approximate a given, smooth function. In contrast to conventionally studied universal approximation properties under increasing architectures, e.g., in terms of width or depth of the networks, we are concerned with the asymptotic growth of the parameters of approximating networks. Such results are of interest, e.g., for error analysis or consistency results for neural network training. The main result of our work is that, for a ReLU architecture with state of the art approximation error, the realizing parameters grow at most polynomially. The obtained rate with respect to a normalized network size is compared to existing results and is shown to be superior in most cases, in particular for high dimensional input.

cs.LG↗

Correlations Are Ruining Your Gradient Descent

Natural gradient descent, and the preconditioned optimizers which have followed from it, correct gradient descent by estimating curvature and applying its inverse to the gradient. For any single layer of a deep neural network, this correction can be shown to approximately separate into two factors: one which accounts for correlations in the gradient signal, and one which accounts for correlations in the data arriving at that layer. Herein we show that this second factor can be expressed as a change of basis rather than of curvature and, considered thus, it can be removed from the optimizer entirely and placed within the network itself. Specifically, we show that, once forward weights are corrected, right-sided natural gradient descent can be implemented in a form which has three exactly equivalent forms: a gradient preconditioner, a decorrelating linear transform in the forward pass, or a set of recurrent dynamics in which all updates are Hebbian and rely only upon locally available signals. The (recurrent) decorrelation method we discover aligns closely with proposed methods for inhibitory learning and homeostatic plasticity in the brain. Notably, our transform requires no matrix inverse, no matrix decomposition, and no information beyond that which is available at an individual synapse. It can therefore be applied in distributed and physically constrained systems, including neuromorphic hardware and nervous systems, where existing preconditioners cannot. We demonstrate its effectiveness empirically in convolutional and residual network models while significantly improving a range of approximate biologically plausible methods for credit assignment.

cs.LG↗