Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2611.03508

LODox: A Web-Based Platform for Cultural Heritage Linked Data Discovery

Puyu Wang·Rui Zhao·Hang Dong
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Recent advances in Large Language Models have transformed how data can be linked, discovered, and enhanced. LODox, Linked Open Data at Oxford, is an evolving web-based platform that embraces this transformation for cultural heritage Linked Open Data. LODox features a novel interface with intuitive card-based data presentation and visualization in a semantic portal. It represents an evolving approach to explore heterogeneous cultural heritage data across multiple sources through a unified interface. In this paper, we will briefly describe the LODox architecture, its implementation, and future development plan, particularly its alignment and integration with Solid.

Explore related subjects

cs.DL

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Puyu Wang, Rui Zhao, Hang Dong. 2026-11-02. LODox: A Web-Based Platform for Cultural Heritage Linked Data Discovery. https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.03508

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Perception and Utilization of Data Carpentry Tools among Research Scholars at University of Kerala

Data Carpentry (DC) has been developed to instruct participants on essential concepts, skills, and tools for more effective and reproducible data management. DC emphasizes data literacy, aiming to equip researchers with the skills necessary to retrieve, view, manipulate, analyze, and store their own and other's data in an open and reproducible manner to derive insights from data. The objective of this study was to assess the perceptions and attitudes towards DC among research scholars of University of Kerala and to find out the purpose for which DC tools is used by the research scholars in the University of Kerala. This study requires a sample of 167 and 179 research scholars completed a questionnaire from a total population of 294 using the Krejcie and Morgan formula, with a 95% confidence interval and a 5% margin of error. SPSS version 22 was used to perform descriptive and inferential statistics on the data. 65.9% of research researchers have experience with DC tools. 48.6% of research researchers at the University of Kerala use DC tools primarily for data analysis. 40.2% of research academics identified insufficient access to training as the most significant obstacle they experience while utilizing DC tools in the study. DC emphasizes data literacy, aiming to equip researchers with the skills necessary to access, view, modify, analyze, and manage their own and others' data in an open and repeatable manner to derive insights from data.

cs.DL↗
arXiv2026

From Triples to Cards: A Web Component for Human-Readable Linked Open Data

JSON-LD is getting increasing attention for publishing Linked Data, especially within cultural heritage. We present LODox Data Viewer, a reusable web component library for data presentation and visualization in semantic portals. It renders JSON-LD as human-readable, themeable cards, embeddable in any semantic portal page with a single script tag. Package URL: https://www.npmjs.com/package/lodox-data-viewer

cs.DL↗
arXiv2026

Ending the NIH embargo accelerated public access to funded research, but substantial delays remain

NIH-funded articles accepted from 1 July 2025 must be public in PubMed Central (PMC) on the day of publication, ending a 12-month embargo in place since 2008. Whether ending the embargo has made articles available sooner has not been measured. Using 1,880 NIH-funded articles published January to April 2026 and 1,880 from 2025, each matched to a same-journal, same-month article that PubMed does not list as US government supported, we compare the change in availability, dated by the day each article went live in PMC. By four months, availability had risen 19.4 percentage points more among NIH-funded articles than among comparison articles. Within a week of publication, however, 6 to 8% of articles in every group and year were available, only 0.1% of NIH-funded articles on the day itself, and the policy effect was 0.3 percentage points. Articles reach PMC by two routes: publishers deposit the final version, or the accepted manuscript is deposited with the author's approval. Two thirds of the gain came through author manuscripts, whose median wait from publication, among those live by the data cut, fell from 374 days in 2025 to 70 in 2026; final versions from publishers moved from 44 days to 36. Agencies ending their embargoes should count days to public access, not only eventual deposit, and test publisher-triggered submission at acceptance.

cs.DL↗