Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2611.06618

Synchronized Hearts, Desynchronized Brains: A Nonlinear Dynamics Perspective for Function and Failure

Abstract

Both the heart and the brain are built from electrically excitable cells, yet the emergent dynamics of these organs could not differ more. In the myocardium, a coherent traveling wave of action potentials ensures coordinated contraction; in the cerebral cortex, distributed, irregular spiking underlies efficient information processing and the generation of behavior. Here, we illuminate the principles that underlie the emergence of such distinct nonlinear dynamics using concepts from complex systems. We trace these principles across scales from ion channels and cellular action potential generation, through cellular coupling mechanisms and network architecture, to organ level dynamics and clinical phenotypes. Designed to support either synchronized waves or desynchronized information processing, the heart and the brain can thus be understood as operating on opposite sides of a synchronization phase transition. Crossing this transition implies pathological dynamics in both organs: Loss of synchrony in the heart produces arrhythmia; excess synchrony in the brain leads to epileptic seizures. We discuss how adaptation mechanisms, including plasticity, modulation, remodeling, and learning, maintain the appropriate level of (de)synchronization. Overall, we provide a unified excitable-system perspective, together with an educational notebook, to foster cross-disciplinary insights into cardiac and neural function and pathology.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Irene Pellini, Simon Bauer, Seba Contreras, Ruben Fernández Busnadiego, Anushka Deb, Sophia Hartmann, Sayedeh Hussaini, Dörte M. Katschinski, Sarah Köster, Stephan E. Lehnart, Tobias Moser, Andreas Neef, Ulrich Parlitz, Silvio Rizzoli, Maria-Patapia Zafeiriou, Wolfram-Hubertus Zimmermann, Johannes Zierenberg, Philip Bittihn, Viola Priesemann. 2026-11-04. Synchronized Hearts, Desynchronized Brains: A Nonlinear Dynamics Perspective for Function and Failure. https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06618

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

A multi-scale information geometry reveals the structure of mutual information in neural populations

Understanding how neural population responses represent sensory information is a central problem in systems neuroscience. One approach is to define a representational geometry on stimulus space in which distances reflect how reliably stimuli can be distinguished from neural activity. However, different constructions of these distances can lead to qualitatively different conclusions about the neural code. Here, we show that a unique Riemannian representational geometry emerges from first principles governing how distances contract as stimulus resolution is lost through coarse-graining. This results in a multi-scale extension of the Fisher information metric, capturing encoding structure from fine stimulus details to coarse global distinctions. The resulting geometry is exactly related to the mutual information encoded by the population: well-encoded stimulus directions (those contributing more to mutual information) are expanded, whereas poorly encoded directions are contracted. The metric tensor can be estimated using diffusion models, making the framework practical for large neural populations and high-dimensional stimuli. Applied to visual cortical responses to natural images, the eigenvectors of the metric tensor identify stimulus variations that contribute most to the encoded stimulus information, yielding interpretable features that are robust to modelling choices. Together, these results provide a principled, information-theoretic framework for characterising neural population codes.

q-bio.NC↗

Oscillatory Phase Coding Emerges in Adaptive RNNs for Flexible Working Memory

Oscillatory phase coding (OPC) is widely observed in neural systems and has been implicated in cognitive functions such as memory and sequence processing. However, its computational role and neural substrates remain largely unclear. Here, we studied OPC by training recurrent neural networks (RNNs) with adaptation to perform sequence working memory tasks with variable delays. After training, we found that OPC emerges in the RNN spontaneously: the memorized items recur at distinct phases of a shared rhythm, with oscillation amplitude encoding item identity and phase encoding serial order. Ablation studies identified three key elements required for OPC: adaptation in neural dynamics, variable delay in memory retention, and flexibility in reading out information. Neuron-type analysis revealed the emergence of content and time cells in the trained RNN, and they process item identity and sequence order separately. Recurrent connectivity analysis revealed phase-organized connections among time cells and structured connections within digit-selective content-cell groups. Inspired by these findings, we proposed a neural circuit model which reproduces OPC through interactions between content units and an adaptive time ring. Together, this study reveals how OPC arises from network structures and task demands, offers insights into the implementation and computational mechanisms of OPC in biological systems, and inspires us to develop computational models for human-like cognitive functions.

q-bio.NC↗

Multimodal Physiological Decoding Reveals Individualized Arousal Dynamics in Closed-Loop Neurofeedback

Most arousal-based brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) use EEG to decode cognitive state. But arousal is an autonomic process. We examined if peripheral physiological signals give a better decode of task-related arousal. We used a public dataset from a difficult boundary-avoidance flight task. In this task, participants received EEG-based BCI neurofeedback, sham feedback, or no feedback. We trained a multimodal deep learning decoder on heart rate, heart rate variability (HRV), respiration, electrodermal activity, and pupil diameter. We compared it with an EEG-only decoder and with the original filter-bank common spatial pattern (FBCSP) decoder. All analyses were offline. The peripheral decoder had a within-subject AUC of 93.0%. The EEG-only decoder had 85.2% and the FBCSP decoder had 79.8%. Only the peripheral decoder showed the Yerkes-Dodson inverted-U relation between decoded arousal and performance. The feedback conditions did not change the arousal trajectories. Thus, the BCI benefit possibly comes from regulation at critical moments in the task, not from a continuous shift. We calculated a time-varying optimal arousal trajectory from control trials. Per-trial deviations from this trajectory predicted performance (r = -0.28 to -0.24, p < 0.01). Baseline HRV and gamma power changed the arousal-performance curve of each subject. We used these values to divide subjects into arousal-sensitive and arousal-tolerant groups. Control bands specific to each group increased trial separation (Cohen's d from 1.21 to 1.32 and from 0.85 to 1.10). These results show that peripheral signals are better than EEG for continuous arousal decoding. They also give a specification for individualized closed-loop arousal regulation. A prospective study must test this specification, for example with personalized transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation.

q-bio.NC↗