Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2611.06984

AdaFloor: Adaptive Floor Planning and Rank-Time Reuse for Long-Tail MoE RL Rollouts

Abstract

Synchronous MoE reinforcement-learning post-training suffers from response-length imbalance. Existing methods reduce request tails, yet completed ranks remain bound to Expert Parallelism (EP) collectives and expert ownership. In a representative 16-accelerator Qwen3-30B-A3B rollout, this dummy run traps 32.83% of rank-time. AdaFloor converts this EP-coupled capacity into bounded leases for auxiliary work to improve system resource efficiency through rank-time reuse. Historical prompt-tail prediction and a calibrated guard construct the KV-safe layout. AdaFloor then selects the floor-specific safe quorum schedule with the largest predicted release area. Its runtime shrinks the EP group and leases detached ranks until full-world restoration. Across three updated-policy seeds on DeepScaleR mathematical reasoning rollouts, its capacity-oriented Natural floor2 configuration with TailGuard reduces Vanilla's 29393.9 rank-seconds of dummy run by 96.15%. Rollout shortening eliminates 18693.6 rank-seconds, while coordinated exits convert another 9568.6 rank-seconds into reusable capacity, leaving 1131.7 rank-seconds. For sidecar reuse, its Planned residency floor4 configuration without TailGuard serves 3134 Qwen3-8B GSM8K queries per epoch at 99.46% accuracy and incurs only a 2 to 3% primary throughput reduction against the same configuration with sidecar execution disabled. Its latency-oriented Planned residency floor4 configuration with TailGuard reduces rollout time by 24.09% relative to Vanilla and by 2.31% relative to LengthSort with TailGuard. On public Eurus-2-RL code rollouts with the same model and 16-rank topology, AdaFloor reduces rollout time by 20.56% and dummy run by 89.13% while generated work and mean reward remain stable.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Jia Wei, Ziyi Qiu, Yi Xu, Xuehai Qian. 2026-11-06. AdaFloor: Adaptive Floor Planning and Rank-Time Reuse for Long-Tail MoE RL Rollouts. https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06984

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Limit Analysis for Symbolic Multi-step Reasoning Tasks with Information Propagation Rules Based on Transformers

Transformers are able to perform reasoning tasks, however the intrinsic mechanism remains widely open. In this paper we propose a set of information propagation rules based on Transformers and utilize symbolic reasoning tasks to theoretically analyze the limit reasoning steps. We show that the limit number of reasoning steps is between $2^{L-1}-1$ and $\frac{3^{L-1}-1}{2}$ for a model with $L$ attention layers in a single-pass. In addition, we find that, for problems with a fixed number of reasoning steps, Transformers exhibit a preference for generating sequences that satisfy certain ordering relations. Ultimately, we construct a Transformer and prove that the limiting reasoning depth is achievable.

cs.AI↗

Counterfactual Distillation: Internalizing Reflective Experience into LLM Agent

Large language models increasingly act as autonomous agents in long-horizon interactions, learning from final outcomes and environmental feedback. However, optimizing from such interaction experience remains challenging, as feedback is heterogeneous and rarely carries explicit reward information. Existing post-training approaches rely on outcome-driven methods, such as reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR), which primarily exploit final success signals while leaving interaction experience and feedback underutilized. In sparse-reward, long-horizon tasks, this often results in distribution sharpening: the policy reinforces a narrow set of already-successful behaviors, without substantially improving the feedback-grounded agency needed for broader problem-solving capacity (e.g., Pass@k). We propose Counterfactual Distillation, a framework that converts exploration-derived experience into trainable policy supervision. Specifically, we organize exploration as a tree-structured search process, where the agent reflects on past decision points and makes new experience-guided decisions to form alternative branches. These corrections are then distilled as counterfactual targets: we train the model to predict the revised action from the original history without explicitly providing the experience, thereby introducing out-of-distribution behavior patterns and expanding exploration capacity. Across diverse interactive coding and agentic tasks, our method outperforms outcome-driven baselines such as GRPO and experience-based methods such as Early Experience, with gains of up to 14 percentage points over the base model on Pass@128. When interleaved with reinforcement learning updates, it further raises the performance ceiling, improving Pass@1 on Sokoban by 8 percentage points over extended GRPO. Our code is available at https://github.com/motigrez/Counterfactual-Distillation.

cs.AI↗

Taming the Centaur(s) with LAPITHS: a framework for a theoretically grounded interpretation of AI performances

We introduce a framework called LAPITHS (Language model Analysis through Paradigm grounded Interpretations of Theses about Human likenesS) and use it to show that several major claims advanced by models such as CENTAUR, proposed as an artificial Unified Model of Cognition, are not theoretically or empirically justified. LAPITHS provides a principled reference point for counteracting the current behaviouristic tendency in AI research to interpret the human level performances of transformer based language models as evidence of human like underlying computation and, by extension, as signs of cognitive abilities. The novelty of LAPITHS lies in making explicit the arguments grounded in two quantitative assessments: (i) the Minimal Cognitive Grid, a theoretically motivated method for estimating the cognitive plausibility of artificial systems, and (ii) a behavioural comparison showing that results similar to those reported for CENTAUR like models can be reproduced by other systems that do not satisfy the structural constraints typically associated with cognitive plausibility, and whose outputs do not provide independent explanatory insight into human cognition.

cs.AI↗