Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2611.07942

Bouncing or Merging in Drop-Bath Impacts

Peter Lewin-Jones·Daniel M. Harris·Radu Cimpeanu·Duncan A. Lockerby·James E. Sprittles
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

When a liquid drop impacts a liquid surface, it deforms the surface, trapping a thin layer of air between drop and bath. The drop then either bounces off the bath or, if the gas film ruptures, merges with it. We present a model for drop-bath impacts that can accurately predict whether a drop will bounce or merge, and compare it to theory-driven experiments. The model incorporates a lubrication description of the deforming trapped gas film, which accounts for its significant curvature, within a finite-element framework. Capturing this outcome requires micro- and nano-scale physics: van der Waals-driven disjoining pressure and gas-kinetic effects that depend on the mean free path of the gas. Using only independently measured material parameters, we obtain the first quantitative agreement with experiment for the critical impact speed separating bounce from merge. We explore the behaviour of drop-bath impacts at low ambient air pressure, and then investigate the bounce-merge threshold for impacts onto shallow baths and thin films, finding a bounce-merge-bounce-merge transition as the bath depth decreases.

Explore related subjects

physics.flu-dyn

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Peter Lewin-Jones, Daniel M. Harris, Radu Cimpeanu, Duncan A. Lockerby, James E. Sprittles. 2026-11-05. Bouncing or Merging in Drop-Bath Impacts. https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07942

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Duty-cycle modulation of the self-sustaining process by spanwise wall oscillation

Direct numerical simulations of turbulent channel flow at Re_tau,0 = 200 examine the modulation of the near-wall self-sustaining process under sinusoidal and shape-optimised spanwise wall oscillation, with the same peak wall velocity and oscillation period. At a period close to the reported sinusoidal optimum for the prescribed peak velocity, the shape-optimised waveform gives a relative increase of approximately 6% in gross drag reduction over the sinusoidal signal, at a higher actuation cost; it is therefore used as a probe of the physical mechanisms underlying drag reduction. Phase-resolved stresses, vorticity variances and component-enstrophy budgets quantify the concurrent action of two tilting paths for the wall-normal vorticity of the near-wall streaks: towards the streamwise direction by the mean shear, and towards the spanwise direction by the Stokes strain. The magnitude of the Stokes strain orders the two paths: the spanwise path prevails over most of the cycle, and the streamwise path only while the strain is small, around its change of sign. Within 5 <= y+ <= 12, under the interval criterion q = 0.5, the shape-optimised waveform holds the strain at a nearly constant level for about 2/3 of the cycle, against 1/3 for the sinusoidal waveform, and so approximately halves the duration of the Reversal interval. The mean-shear production of streamwise enstrophy occurs mainly during Reversal: for the shape-optimised waveform its conditional rate is higher in every interval, whereas its time average is 23% lower, as Reversal is shorter. The lift-up production of wall-normal enstrophy is lower at every sampled phase. These observations support a duty-cycle description of the near-wall activity, in which the duration of each interval and the production rate within it are distinguished.

physics.flu-dyn↗
arXiv2026

Sub-filter-scale stress and heat flux in hypersonic Couette flow and a flat-plate boundary layer

A comparative study of sub-filter-scale (SFS) quantities in hypersonic Couette flow and flat-plate boundary layer turbulence under strongly cooled-wall conditions is carried out using filtered direct numerical simulation (DNS) data to characterize the differences in SFS dynamics between internal and external wall-bounded turbulence. The two flows exhibit similar near-wall behaviour in the mean velocity profiles and SFS stress components; however, marked differences emerge in the outer layer and thermal structure. The two configurations also exhibit different thermal fields, leading to different temperature-velocity relations. The SFS behaviour shows strong sensitivity to the filtering operation: the top-hat filter yields larger SFS magnitudes, whereas the sharp spectral filter preserves a distinct spectral separation near the cutoff, leading to characteristic SFS features. Decomposition of the SFS terms shows that the residual component provides the dominant contribution to the mean SFS shear stress and heat flux. Differences between the two flows are primarily associated with the interaction terms between the resolved and residual components, which contribute with opposite signs in the two configurations, consistent with their different thermal structures. The different thermal structures also lead to distinct SFS heat-flux behaviour, including a sign change in the flat-plate boundary layer. Instantaneous SFS fields further reveal that local extrema arise from the combined contributions of multiple decomposed terms. Although these terms exhibit large local fluctuations, their net contributions to the averaged SFS quantities are relatively small. The trace of the SFS stress exhibits local negative values, reflecting local energy redistribution across the filter scale rather than a loss of physical energy.

physics.flu-dyn↗
arXiv2026

Domain-Adapted Deep Optical Flow for Multiphase Velocimetry in Unsteady Cloud Cavitation

Time-resolved velocimetry inside cloud cavitation remains a fundamental measurement problem. Particle image velocimetry (PIV) requires uniform tracer seeding and undistorted particle images, and cavitating flow violates both, because tracers do not penetrate vapor structures and refractive index mismatch across deforming interfaces produces spurious vectors. We present a domain-adapted deep optical flow framework for two-phase velocimetry, built on a Recurrent All-Pairs Field Transforms (RAFT) architecture fine-tuned on synthetic image pairs rendered from multiphase OpenFOAM simulations (RAFT-CloudCav). It is evaluated against a pre-trained generalist RAFT model, Farnebäck and OpenPIV on 130,000 frames/s recordings of a Venturi test section at 30 and 48 L/min. As no experimental ground truth exists, validation uses three quantities that require none, namely the integrated flow rate against a turbine meter, the liquid-phase velocity divergence, which mass conservation requires to vanish, and the station-to-station spread of the flow rate. RAFT-CloudCav recovers 47.75 L/min against a metered 48.0 $\pm$ 0.5 L/min, the closest of the four methods, and its flow rate varies by 2.0% across four streamwise stations, versus 6-7% for the classical methods. It returns a coherent near-wall reverse flow of -0.71 m/s, the time-averaged signature of the upstream-propagating re-entrant jet, where OpenPIV returns none. In the non-cavitating control, at 51 $μ$m/pixel only three grid points fall inside a 0.68 mm boundary layer and the peak wall-normal gradient is under-predicted more than thirtyfold, while 13 and 19 $μ$m/pixel agree with each other. The mean field is recovered without tracer particles at roughly three times the per-frame uncertainty. Uncertainties are estimated a posteriori from the image residual and propagated conservatively.

physics.flu-dyn↗