Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2611.08267

The slower rotation of planet-hosting stars revisited

Abstract

Previous studies combined rotation periods derived from Kepler photometry, stellar parameters from previous Gaia Data Releases, and planet hosts from the NASA Exoplanet Archive to conclude that statistically planet-hosting stars rotate slower than stars without detected planets. Here, we revisit these studies by using similar Kepler rotational period sample, but with an updated Gaia DR3-based stellar parameter catalogue and an updated exoplanet catalogue. We apply minimal sample cuts in evolutionary state, metallicity, and distance, and then model the stellar rotation period as a function of effective temperature alone. For each star, we derive the ratio of its observed period to the temperature-expected period, and compare the ratio distributions for the planet-host and non-host stars. For periods shorter than 20 d, the planet-host distribution of this ratio is shifted towards longer periods; the period-ratio median is ~15% larger for hosts than for non-hosts (p_KS = 2.4 x 10^-4). We also examine the recently published TESS All-Sky Rotation Survey (TARS) and find a similar trend. However, the strongly structured period distribution precludes a robust comparison between the host and the non-host stars. Therefore, the updated analysis, using more robust stellar and planetary parameters, recovers the previously reported association, strengthening the case for a genuine connection between stellar rotation and planet occurrence.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Avraham Binnenfeld, Amitay Sussholz, Simchon Faigler, Tsevi Mazeh. 2026-11-05. The slower rotation of planet-hosting stars revisited. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras%2Fstag2119

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Cosmic Ray Inter-Station Fluctuations as Precursors of Geomagnetic Storms: Causal Baseline Analysis and Forecasting Limitations

The modulation of galactic cosmic rays (GCRs) by interplanetary disturbances, manifested as Forbush decreases, provides a potential signature of coronal mass ejection passage. Previous precursor studies often suffer from solar-cycle bias due to non-causal baselines and lack strict false-alarm evaluations. Here we analyze 25 years of hourly neutron-monitor data from seven stations (1995-2019) using a strictly causal baseline fitted only to past geomagnetically quiet days. We introduce two direction-free metrics: the inter-station dispersion ($A_{disp}$) and the mean-removed variance ($A'_{var}$). Using superposed-epoch analysis aligned on storm sudden commencements (SSCs), we find that both indices are enhanced, on average, in the days before storm onset relative to a quiet random control, and that the window-mean amplitude increases with storm intensity. The enhancement is broad and should not be interpreted as an event-specific lead time. A Molchan-diagram evaluation shows that a single-threshold alert based on $A_{disp}$ or $A'_{var}$ does not exceed the random-alert baseline at the 95th-percentile threshold. The correlation with storm intensity is moderate ($ρ=-0.28$; AUC $=0.66$ for severe versus moderate storms). These results indicate that inter-station cosmic-ray fluctuations are useful diagnostics of the disturbed heliospheric state, but they are not an independent operational forecasting tool; a reliable warning system will require combination with solar-wind and interplanetary-magnetic-field information.

astro-ph.SR↗

Interferometric survey of stellar parameters. Reliable methodology for a direct measurement of the angular diameter in exoplanet host stars

Since their pioneer observations more than thirty years ago, exoplanets have been a major topic among the astrophysics community. Despite their ubiquity, our knowledge of planetary parameters and internal compositions still mostly relies on stellar quantities estimated through evolutionary models, which suffer from a calibration bias, preventing the community to have accurate discussions on the diversity of planets across the Universe. We use our sample to demonstrate the current best reachable precision of the CHARA Array to be $\sim$ 2% on radius determination, with an error budget dominated by the uncertainty on the angular diameter, while systematics are shown to be of the order of 1% thanks to our methodology. While the precision matches values found in the literature, we demonstrate the uniqueness of the present study in the relevance of the results put forward. Finally, we show that our methods naturally translate into an improved accuracy of the planetary parameters, along with an improvement in precision by $\sim$ 50% in radius and $\sim$ 30% in mass.

astro-ph.SR↗

Tidal Braking Does Not Dominate Open-Cluster Slow Rotators

Extended main-sequence turn-offs (eMSTOs) observed in open clusters younger than $2~\mathrm{Gyr}$ are commonly attributed to a spread in stellar rotation rates. Tidal synchronization in close binary systems has been proposed as a possible mechanism for producing slowly rotating stars. To test this hypothesis, we measured the radial-velocity (RV) dispersions of slow-rotator samples associated with the eMSTOs of eight open clusters using ESO VLT/GIRAFFE and SALT/RSS spectroscopy. We extended the analysis to 40 open clusters using Gaia DR3 RV measurements. The observed cluster RV dispersions are generally substantially smaller than those predicted for binary populations dominated by close systems with orbital periods for which tidal synchronization is expected to be effective. In particular, all 40 clusters in the Gaia sample have RV dispersions below the prediction of the $P=10$ d binary-population model. These results suggest that close, tidally synchronized binaries are unlikely to be the dominant origin of slow-rotator populations in young and intermediate-age open clusters, although a contribution from undetected or wider binary systems cannot be excluded.

astro-ph.SR↗