arXiv · astro-ph/0303607
Near-IR spectra of ISOGAL sources in the Inner Galactic Bulge
Abstract
In this work we present near-IR spectra (HK-band) of a sample of 107 sources with mid-IR excesses at 7 and 15 $\rm μ$m detected during the ISOGAL survey. Making use of the DENIS interstellar extinction map from Schultheis et al. (1999) we derive luminosities and find that the $\rm M_{bol}$ vs.~$\rm ^{12}CO$ and $\rm M_{bol} vs. H_{2}O$ diagrams are powerful tools for identifying supergiants, AGB stars, giants and young stellar objects. The majority of our sample are AGB stars (~ 80%) while we find four good supergiant candidates, nine young stellar objects and 12 RGB candidates. We have used the most recent $\rm K_{0}-[15]$ relation by Jeong et al. (2002) based on recent theoretical modeling of dust formation of AGB stars to determine mass-loss rates. However, the uncertainties in the mass-loss rates are rather large. The mass-loss rates of the supergiants are comparable with those in the solar neighbourhood while the long-period Variables cover a mass-loss range from $\rm -5 < log \dot{\it{M}} < -7$. The red giant candidateslie at the lower end of the mass-loss rate range between $\rm -6.5 < log \dot{\it{M}} < -9$. We used the equivalent width of the CO bandhead at 2.3 $\rm μm$, the NaI doublet and the CaI triplet to estimate metallicities using the relation by Ram\'ırez et al. (\cite{Ramirez2000}). The metallicity distribution of the ISOGAL objects shows a mean [Fe/H] $\sim$ -0.25 dex with a dispersion of $\rm \pm 0.40 dex$ which is in agreement with the values of Ramírez et al. (\cite{Ramirez2000}) for Galactic Bulge fields between $\rm b = -4^{o}$ and $\rm b = -1.3^{o}$. A comparison with the solar neighbourhood sample of Lançon & Wood (LW) shows that our sample is ~ 0.5 dex more metal-rich on average.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
M. Schultheis, A. Lançon, A. Omont, F. Schuller, D. K. Ojha. 2003-03-27. Near-IR spectra of ISOGAL sources in the Inner Galactic Bulge. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361%3A20030459
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.