arXiv · cmp-lg/9706019
Evaluating Competing Agent Strategies for a Voice Email Agent
Abstract
This paper reports experimental results comparing a mixed-initiative to a system-initiative dialog strategy in the context of a personal voice email agent. To independently test the effects of dialog strategy and user expertise, users interact with either the system-initiative or the mixed-initiative agent to perform three successive tasks which are identical for both agents. We report performance comparisons across agent strategies as well as over tasks. This evaluation utilizes and tests the PARADISE evaluation framework, and discusses the performance function derivable from the experimental data.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Marilyn Walker, Donald Hindle, Jeanne Fromer, Giuseppe Di Fabbrizio, Craig Mestel. 1997-06-13. Evaluating Competing Agent Strategies for a Voice Email Agent. https://arxiv.org/abs/cmp-lg/9706019
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.