arXiv · hep-ex/0611025
Why do we need the new BNL muon g-2 experiment now?
Abstract
New final results from the CMD-2 and SND e+e- annihilation experiments, together with radiative return measurements from BaBar, lead to recent improvements in the standard model prediction for the muon anomaly. The uncertainty at 0.48 ppm--a largely data-driven result--is now slightly below the experimental uncertainty of 0.54 ppm. The difference, a_mu(expt)- a_mu(SM) = (27.6 +/- 8.4) x 10^-10, represents a 3.3 standard deviation effect. At this level, it is one of the most compelling indicators of physics beyond the standard model and, at the very least, a major constraint for speculative new theories such as SUSY or extra dimensions. Others at this Workshop detailed further planned standard model theory improvements to a_mu. Here I outline how BNL E969 will achieve a factor of 2 or more reduction in the experimental uncertainty. The new experiment is based on a proven technique and track record. I argue that this work must be started now to have maximal impact on the interpretation of the new physics anticipated to be unearthed at the LHC.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
David W. Hertzog. 2006-11-14. Why do we need the new BNL muon g-2 experiment now?. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2007.03.032
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.