arXiv · hep-ph/0004218
Reply to Boglione and Pennington
Abstract
In a recent article we presented an argument which, we believe, shows to be incorrect an estimate, by Boglione and Pennington, of corrections to the valence (quenched) approximation predictions for properties of the lightest scalar glueball. Boglione and Pennington's reply to our article, it appears to us, fails to address the specific technical issues we raised.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
W. Lee, D. Weingarten. 2000-04-24. Reply to Boglione and Pennington. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.62.038502
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.