Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv · math/0109186

The Geometry of Grauert Tubes and Complexification of Symmetric Spaces

Abstract

We study the canonical complexifications of non-compact Riemannian symmetric spaces G/K by the Grauert tube construction. We determine the maximal such complexification, a domain already constructed in another context by Akhiezer and Gindikin (Math. Ann., 1990), and show that this domain is Stein. We show there is an alternative for a G-invariant complexification: it is either "rigid" (its automorphism group is G), or it is a Hermmitian symmetric space. We also determine when invariant complexifications, especially the maximal one, are Hermitian symmetric. This is expressed simply in terms of the ranks of the symmetric spaces involved.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D. Burns, S. Halverscheid, R. Hind. 2001-09-24. The Geometry of Grauert Tubes and Complexification of Symmetric Spaces. https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0109186

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Different approach to certain problems in univalent function theory

Using different approach we consider some problems for the class $\mathcal{S}_{ex}^{\star}$ defined by the condition $\frac{zf'(z)}{f(z)}\prec e^{αz}$, $0<α\leq1.$ Our method is more simple than that used by Das and Sarkar in their work: \textit{Sharp coefficient estimates for the exponential starlike class $S^\star_{ex}$} (\cite{DS26}).

math.CV↗

Local convexity obstructions for bounded realizations of Teichmüller space

Let $D\subset\mathbb{C}^n$, $n\ge2$, be a bounded domain that is biholomorphic to a finite-dimensional Teichmüller space. We prove that $\partial D$ has no locally convex boundary patch containing a complex $(n-1)$-dimensional manifold through each of its points. Note that in complex dimension two this excludes every locally convex boundary point, without any boundary regularity assumption. In every dimension, we also exclude locally convex $C^2$ boundary patches.

math.CV↗