Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · math/0210078

Some consequences of a recursive number-theoretic relation that is not the standard interpretation of any of its formal representations

Bhupinder Singh Anand
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We give a precise definition of a formal mathematical object as any symbol for an individual constant, predicate letter, or a function letter that can be introduced through definition into a formal mathematical language without inviting inconsistency. We then show: there is an elementary, recursive, number-theoretic relation that is not a formal mathematical object, since it is not the standard interpretation of any of its representations in Goedel's formal system P; the range of a recursive number-theoretic function does not always define a (recursively enumerable set) formal mathematical object consistently in any Axiomatic Set Theory that models P; there is no P-formula, Con(P), whose standard interpretation is unambiguously equivalent to Goedel's number-theoretic definition of "P is consistent"; every recursive number-theoretic function is not strongly representable in P; Tarski's definitions of "satisfiability" and "truth" can be made constructive, and intuitionistically unobjectionable, by reformulating Church's Thesis constructively; the classical definition of Turing machines can be extended to include self-terminating, converging, and oscillating routines; a constructive Church's Thesis implies, firstly, that every partial recursive number-theoretic function can be constructively extended as a unique total function, and, secondly, that we can define effectively computable functions that are not classically Turing-computable; Turing's and Cantor's diagonal arguments do not necessarily define Cauchy sequences.

Explore related subjects

math.GM

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Bhupinder Singh Anand. 2003-05-11. Some consequences of a recursive number-theoretic relation that is not the standard interpretation of any of its formal representations. https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0210078

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Average Chord Lengths in a Triangle

Let $P$ be a point inside a triangle $T$. We consider the average length of the chords of $T$ through $P$, where the direction of the chord is chosen uniformly. An elementary formula is obtained in terms of the distances from $P$ to the sides and vertices of the triangle. Several classical triangle centers give especially simple specializations. For example, if $I$ is the incenter, then \[ M_T(I)=\frac{2r}{\pi} \log\left(\cot\frac A4\cot\frac B4\cot\frac C4\right). \] Our main result is the sharp inequality \[ M_T(P)\le \frac{p}{\pi\sqrt3}\log(2+\sqrt3), \] valid simultaneously for every triangle of perimeter $p$ and every interior point $P$. Thus, among all such pairs $(T,P)$, the largest possible average chord length occurs only when $T$ is equilateral and $P$ is its center. The proof is an elementary symmetrization argument. We close with brief remarks relating the problem to the radial center of a convex body, the electrostatic potential center of a triangle, and dual quermassintegrals.

math.GM↗
arXiv2026

A Proof of Liu's Conjecture on the Fundamental Triangle Inequality

Let $a,b,c$ be the side lengths of a triangle, and let $R$ and $r$ denote its circumradius and inradius, respectively. We prove a conjecture of Liu stating that \[\sum_{\mathrm{cyc}} \left(\frac{a(b+c-a)}{bc}\right)^k \geq 2+\left(\frac{2r}{R}\right)^k,~~k>1, \] with the reverse inequality for $0<k<1$. The proof reduces the problem to three positive variables with fixed sum and product. We also determine the equality cases.

math.GM↗