arXiv · math/0307074
How definitive is the standard interpretation of Goedel's Incompleteness Theorem?
Abstract
Standard interpretations of Goedel's "undecidable" proposition, [(Ax)R(x)], argue that, although [~(Ax)R(x)] is PA-provable if [(Ax)R(x)] is PA-provable, we may not conclude from this that [~(Ax)R(x)] is PA-provable. We show that such interpretations are inconsistent with a standard Deduction Theorem of first order theories.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Bhupinder Singh Anand. 2003-07-05. How definitive is the standard interpretation of Goedel's Incompleteness Theorem?. https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0307074
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.