arXiv · math/0607333
Why we shouldn't fault Lucas and Penrose for continuing to believe in the Goedelian argument against computationalism
Abstract
The only fault we can fairly lay at Lucas' and Penrose's doors, for continuing to believe in the essential soundness of the Goedelian argument, is their naive faith in, first, non-verifiable assertions in standard expositions of classical theory, and, second, in Goedel's unvalidated interpretation of his own formal reasoning. We show why their faith is misplaced in both instances.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Bhupinder Singh Anand. 2006-07-14. Why we shouldn't fault Lucas and Penrose for continuing to believe in the Goedelian argument against computationalism. https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0607333
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.