Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · math/9901056

On Ginzburg's Lagrangian construction of representations of GL(n)

A. Braverman·D. Gaitsgory
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In 1991 V. Ginzburg observed that one can realize irreducible representations of the group $GL(n,C)$ in the cohomology of certain Springer's fibers for the group GL(d) (for all natural d). However, Ginzburg's construction of the action of GL(n) on this cohomology was a bit artificial (he defined the action of Chevalley generators of the Lie algebra gl(n) on the corresponding cohomology by certain explicit correspondences, following the work of A. Beilinson, G. Lusztig and R. MacPherson, who gave a similar construction of the quantum group $U_q(gl(n))$). In this note we give a very simple geometric definition of the action of the whole group GL(n,C) on the above cohomology and simplify the Ginzburg's results.

Explore related subjects

math.AGmath.RT

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A. Braverman, D. Gaitsgory. 1999-01-15. On Ginzburg's Lagrangian construction of representations of GL(n). https://arxiv.org/abs/math/9901056

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Wall divisors on irreducible symplectic orbifolds of Nikulin-type

We determine the wall divisors on irreducible symplectic orbifolds which are deformation equivalent to a special type of examples, called Nikulin orbifolds. The Nikulin orbifolds are obtained as partial resolutions in codimension 2 of a quotient by a symplectic involution of a Hilbert scheme of 2 points on a K3 surface. This builds on the previous article arXiv:2009.04873 in which the theory of wall divisors was generalized to orbifold singularities.

math.AG↗
arXiv2026

Prekosmic Grothendieck/Galois Categories

We establish a generalized version of the duality between groups and the categories of their representations on sets. Given an abstract symmetric monoidal category $K$ called Galois prekosmos, we define pre-Galois objects in $K$ and study the categories of their representations internal to $K$. The motivating example of $K$ is the cartesian monoidal category $\textit{Set}$ of sets, and pre-Galois objects in $\textit{Set}$ are groups. We present an axiomatic definition of pre-Galois $K$-categories, which is a complete abstract characterization of the categories of representations of pre-Galois objects in $K$. The category of covering spaces over a well-connected topological space is a prototype of a pre-Galois $\textit{Set}$-category. We establish a perfect correspondence between pre-Galois objects in $K$ and pre-Galois $K$-categories pointed with pre-fiber functors. We also establish a generalized version of the duality between flat affine group schemes and the categories of their linear representations. Given an abstract symmetric monoidal category $K$ called Grothendieck prekosmos, we define what are pre-Grothendieck objects in $K$ and study the categories of their representations internal to $K$. The motivating example of $K$ is the symmetric monoidal category $\textit{Vec}_k$ of vector spaces over a field $k$, and pre-Grothendieck objects in $\textit{Vec}_k$ are affine group $k$-schemes. We present an axiomatic definition of pre-Grothendieck $K$-categories, which is a complete abstract characterization of the categories of representations of pre-Grothendieck objects in $K$. The indization of a neutral Tannakian category over a field $k$ is a prototype of a pre-Grothendieck $\textit{Vec}_k$-category. We establish a perfect correspondence between pre-Grothendieck objects in $K$ and pre-Grothendieck $K$-categories pointed with pre-fiber functors.

math.AG↗