Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv · physics/0610109

Climate simulations for 1880-2003 with GISS modelE

Abstract

We carry out climate simulations for 1880-2003 with GISS modelE driven by ten measured or estimated climate forcings. An ensemble of climate model runs is carried out for each forcing acting individually and for all forcing mechanisms acting together. We compare side-by-side simulated climate change for each forcing, all forcings, observations, unforced variability among model ensemble members, and, if available, observed variability. Discrepancies between observations and simulations with all forcings are due to model deficiencies, inaccurate or incomplete forcings, and imperfect observations. Although there are notable discrepancies between model and observations, the fidelity is sufficient to encourage use of the model for simulations of future climate change. By using a fixed well-documented model and accurately defining the 1880-2003 forcings, we aim to provide a benchmark against which the effect of improvements in the model, climate forcings, and observations can be tested. Principal model deficiencies include unrealistically weak tropical El Nino-like variability and a poor distribution of sea ice, with too much sea ice in the Northern Hemisphere and too little in the Southern Hemisphere. The greatest uncertainties in the forcings are the temporal and spatial variations of anthropogenic aerosols and their indirect effects on clouds.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J. Hansen, M. Sato, R. Ruedy, P. Kharecha, A. Lacis, R. Miller, L. Nazarenko, K. Lo, G. A. Schmidt, G. Russell, I. Aleinov, S. Bauer, E. Baum, B. Cairns, V. Canuto, M. Chandler, Y. Cheng, A. Cohen, A. Del Genio, G. Faluvegi, E. Fleming, A. Friend, T. Hall, C. Jackman, J. Jonas, M. Kelley, N. Y. Kiang, D. Koch, G. Labow, J. Lerner, S. Menon, T. Novakov, V. Oinas, Ja. Perlwitz, Ju. Perlwitz, D. Rind, A. Romanou, R. Schmunk, D. Shindell, P. Stone, S. Sun, D. Streets, N. Tausnev, D. Thresher, N. Unger, M. Yao, S. Zhang. 2007-04-12. Climate simulations for 1880-2003 with GISS modelE. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-007-0255-8

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

SwAIther-Precip: Lead-Time-Aware Bias Correction Enables Kilometer-Scale Downscaling of Global AI Precipitation Forecasts over Switzerland

Skillful medium-range precipitation forecasting at kilometer scale remains challenging over complex terrain because precipitation arises from multiscale nonlinear processes that global models cannot explicitly resolve at affordable cost. Global AI weather models can produce skillful medium-range forecasts, but their native 0.25 degrees resolution limits direct use for local hazard applications. Statistical downscaling can help bridge this gap, yet existing approaches often struggle with state-dependent, and especially lead-time-dependent, biases in global forecasts. We introduce SwAIther-Precip, a lead-time-aware downscaling framework that converts coarse-resolution AIFS forecasts into probabilistic km-scale precipitation fields over Switzerland. First, a U-Net conditioned on lead time via feature-wise linear modulation deterministically corrects systematic biases at coarse resolution. This targeted correction enables a cheaper super-resolution stage conditioned only on corrected precipitation, allowing direct training on observations rather than on the full atmospheric state. A diffusion-based model then generates fine-scale spatial variability independently of lead time. Using AIFS forecasts and CombiPrecip radar-gauge observations, SwAIther-Precip reduces CRPS by 48% relative to raw AIFS. The generated fields reproduce observed spatial variability with spectral fidelity above 0.85 at large scales and 0.88 at small scales, corresponding to an effective resolution of approximately 4 km on a 1 km grid for lead times up to 5 days. Training across lead times further improves long-range performance, yielding a 13% CRPS reduction at 6 days relative to lead-time-specific models. These results show that explicitly correcting lead-time-dependent biases before generative super-resolution is key to efficient km-scale probabilistic downscaling of global AI precipitation forecasts.

physics.ao-ph↗

Wind vector retrieval from miniaturized wave-enabled sea-surface drifters

Open-ocean in situ winds are sparse, limiting the calibration and validation of satellite wind products. We evaluate wind-vector retrieval from MELODI (Miniaturized Electronics Lagrangian Oceanographic DrIfter), a compact freely drifting GNSS/IMU wave buoy. Wind speed is inferred from the shape of the measured wave acceleration spectrum. A regularized regression with a gated nonlinear correction (Wind Inversion using Tikhonov Regularization, WITR), trained on scatterometer winds and evaluated by leave-one-buoy-out cross-validation against ASCAT MetOp-B/C and HY-2B/C, gives a root-mean-square difference (RMSD) of 0.91 m/s. Symbolic regression distills the trained model into compact spectrum-only and motion-enhanced equations suitable for onboard use; the reduced drag law gives 0.93-0.94 m/s. Wind direction is estimated, without any fitted reference-wind regression, from IMU-derived directional wave moments in the 0.60-0.90 Hz wind-sea band, with a circular mean absolute angular difference (MAAD) of 9.4 degrees against ASCAT. These differences are comparable to published scatterometer-moored-buoy comparisons and improve substantially on the traditional single-band Toba inversion. Validation is strongest from 4 to 14 m/s and sparse above approximately 16 m/s; stronger winds are assigned low confidence. The results show that small wave-sensing drifters, calibrated to the well-established scatterometer wind scale, can provide useful wind-vector observations for validating satellite wind products and for atmospheric and wave modeling; stronger-wind sampling remains a priority.

physics.ao-ph↗

Scale-aware and spatially-localised optimisation of kilometre-scale MLWP models

Preserving fine-scale structure without degrading spatial accuracy is a central challenge for kilometre-scale machine-learning weather prediction (MLWP). We introduce a loss based on the dual-tree complex wavelet transform that constrains atmospheric fields jointly by scale, location, and orientation. We evaluate its performance using an experimental joint global--regional FastNet configuration, which produces \SI{1.5}{km} forecasts over the UK alongside $\sim$\SI{31}{km} global forecasts. Relative to both mean-squared error (MSE) and an FFT-based spectral objective, the wavelet loss substantially improves spectral fidelity. Compared with MSE training, it maintains similar pointwise performance, improves neighbourhood-based verification, and produces sharper precipitation fields with more realistic intensity distributions. These results demonstrate that spatially localised wavelet constraints can preserve multiscale atmospheric structure while largely avoiding the loss of pointwise accuracy associated with globally supported spectral objectives.

physics.ao-ph↗