Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv · q-bio/0411003

Conditional Network Analysis Identifies Candidate Regulator Genes in Human B Cells

Abstract

Cellular phenotypes are determined by the dynamical activity of networks of co-regulated genes. Elucidating such networks is crucial for the understanding of normal cell physiology as well as for the dissection of complex pathologic phenotypes. Existing methods for such "reverse engineering" of genetic networks from microarray expression data have been successful only in prokaryotes (E. coli) and lower eukaryotes (S. cerevisiae) with relatively simple genomes. Additionally, they have mostly attempted to reconstruct average properties about the network connectivity without capturing the highly conditional nature of the interactions. In this paper we extend the ARACNE algorithm, which we recently introduced and successfully applied to the reconstruction of whole-genome transcriptional networks from mammalian cells, precisely to link the existence of specific network structures to the expression or lack thereof of specific regulator genes. This is accomplished by analyzing thousands of alternative network topologies generated by constraining the data set on the presence or absence of putative regulator genes. By considering interactions that are consistently supported across several such constraints, we identify many transcriptional interactions that would not have been detectable by the original method. By selecting genes that produce statistically significant changes in network topology, we identify novel candidate regulator genes. Further analysis shows that transcription factors, kinases, phosphatases, and other gene families known to effect biochemical interactions, are significantly overrepresented among the set of candidate regulator genes identified in silico, indirectly supporting the validity of the approach.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Kai Wang, Nilanjana Banerjee, Adam Margolin, Ilya Nemenman, Katia Basso, Riccardo Favera, Andrea Califano. 2004-10-30. Conditional Network Analysis Identifies Candidate Regulator Genes in Human B Cells. https://arxiv.org/abs/q-bio/0411003

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Accelerating reaction network identification via frequency-domain analysis

The identification of intracellular reaction networks from single-cell data lies at the heart of many biological studies, as it can unravel key mechanisms in living organisms and provide insights for their rational engineering. However, the stochastic and nonlinear nature of these reacting systems poses significant challenges for this identification problem, making the state-of-the-art methods (e.g., particle-filtering-based approaches) computationally demanding. This paper reports a noteworthy numerical observation that for certain systems, the Fourier transform can render the likelihood of the measurement data approximately Gaussian, therefore resulting in a substantially accelerated Bayesian inference algorithm. A gene transcription example is presented to illustrate this finding and demonstrate the efficiency of {the proposed Fourier-based method}.

q-bio.MN↗

Can a self-sustaining chemical network emerge due to just a few catalysts?

Understanding how self-sustaining chemical reaction networks can emerge from simple molecules is an important question in chemical approaches to the origin of life. Reflexively autocatalytic and food-generated (RAF) sets provide a mathematical framework for investigating this question. This line of research goes back to the early work of Kauffman on autocatalytic reaction networks and was subsequently developed through the probabilistic framework of Mossel and Steel. Further contributions by Hordijk, Steel, and collaborators extended the theory to more heterogeneous forms of catalysis, including reaction-dependent probabilities or power-law distributions of catalytic activity. We introduce a stochastic model that combines heterogeneous molecular catalytic activity with reaction-dependent molecule-reaction compatibility. By assigning random catalytic weights to molecules and incorporating compatibility through an explicit formulation of catalysis probabilities, our model provides a concrete and flexible setting that captures both sources of heterogeneity while remaining mathematically tractable. We establish novel and general criteria for RAF formation and nonformation. We further demonstrate that classical phase-transition criteria need not remain valid in the presence of reaction-dependent catalysis. For heavy-tailed catalytic weights, we identify and rigorously quantify an additional phase transition. In models with finite-mean catalytic weights, RAF formation and nonformation are governed by a catalytic intensity parameter. For infinite-mean weights, however, we show that RAFs may emerge with probability tending to one even when the catalytic intensity parameter tends to zero.

q-bio.MN↗

Modeling Gene Expression Noise: From Transcriptional Dynamics to Cell Growth and Division

Gene expression is inherently noisy, leading to substantial cell-to-cell variation in mRNA and protein levels. The telegraph model and the simpler bursty model provide good fits to single-cell count distributions and have been used extensively to understand transcriptional kinetics and estimate the kinetic parameters. However, these models all describe a static cell. Here, we review models of stochastic gene expression in growing and dividing cells which aim to understand how a cell's own life history, from its birth, through copying its genome, to its division, leaves a distinct fluctuation signature on molecule numbers. We discuss the biochemical and biophysical processes captured by these models, their analytical tractability, the concept of cyclo-stationary behavior, when this is well approximated by the steady-state of static models and how the distributions of molecular numbers measured under these conditions sensitively depend on the experimental setup. This is followed by a discussion of how these models are fitted to single-cell measurements, how biological variability can be separated from measurement noise, and which computational advances make this feasible for thousands of genes. We finish by highlighting the open problems in the field.

q-bio.MN↗