arXiv subjects

Allan Borodin

Publications and source records attributed to Allan Borodin.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Revisiting Real-Time Interval and Throughput Maximization

Job throughput maximization is the central maximization problem in scheduling. Interval scheduling is the special case of throughput maximization when jobs are intervals and therefore there is no slack available in which to schedule a job. It is interesting to know to what extent results for interval scheduling can be extended to the more general throughput problem in the real-time model. For the unweighted and proportionally weighted throughput problem (where the weight or value $w_i$ of a job $J_i$ is its processing time $p_i$), there are constant competitive real-time scheduling algorithms using preemption with restarting. More generally, the result for proportionally weighted interval scheduling can be extended to C-Benevolent weight functions. We also introduce a new real-time model in which jobs are announced before the actual release time of a job. We show that with sufficient advance notice, we can obtain a constant competitive ratio for proportionally weighted throughput {\it without any preemption}. However, this advance notice result does not extend to arbitrary C-Benevolent and D-Benevolent weight functions. Finally, we show that unlike interval scheduling, unweighted throughput using preemption with revoking admits no constant competitive ratio when the number of distinct processing times is unrestricted. More precisely, for instances with at most $k$ distinct processing times, we give a lower bound of $1/(k+1)$ and a deterministic $1/(2k)$-competitive algorithm.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Online Temporal Voting: Strategyproofness, Proportionality and Asymptotic Analysis

We study online temporal voting, where a group of voters submit 0/1 approvals on sets of alternatives that arrive online over multiple rounds and a single alternative is chosen in each round. We introduce online variants of two well-known game theoretic properties, strategyproofness (SP) and independence of irrelevant alternatives. We show that online independence of irrelevant alternatives (OIIA) is a sufficient condition for online strategyproofness (OSP), and that several known online voting rules satisfy OIIA and thus OSP, but that they are not SP. In particular, we show that Perpetual Phragmen, the only known online voting rule to satisfy PJR, satisfies OSP. The Method of Equal Shares (MES), a semi-online voting rule knwon to satisfy wEJR, also satisfies OSP. We then introduce the price of manipulability, which quantifies the effect of strategic behaviour on proportional representation guarantees. Finally, we introduce asymptotic satisfaction of proportional representation and show that an online voting rule, Serial Dictator, is fully strategyproof and satisfies proportional justified representation (PJR) up to an additive constant.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2026

Deterministically Simulating Barely Random Algorithms in the Random-Order Arrival Model

Interest in the random-order model (ROM) leads us to initiate a study of utilizing random-order arrivals to extract random bits with the goal of derandomizing algorithms. Besides producing simple algorithms, simulating random bits through random arrivals enhances our understanding of the comparative strength of randomized online algorithms (with adversarial input sequences) and deterministic algorithms in the ROM. We consider three $1$-bit randomness extraction processes. Our best extraction process returns a bit with a worst-case bias of $2 - \sqrt{2} \approx 0.585$ and operates under the mild assumption that there exist at least two distinct items in the input. We motivate the applicability of this process by using it to simulate a number of barely random algorithms for weighted interval selection (single-length with arbitrary weights, as well as monotone, C-benevolent and D-benevolent weighted instances), the proportional and general knapsack problems, job throughput scheduling, and makespan minimization. It is well known that there are many applications where a deterministic ROM algorithm significantly outperforms any randomized online algorithm (in terms of competitive ratios). The classic example is that of the secretary problem. We ask the following fundamental question: Is there any application for which a randomized algorithm outperforms any deterministic ROM algorithm? Motivated by this question, we view our randomness extraction applications as a constructive approach toward understanding the relationship between randomized online algorithms and deterministic algorithms in the ROM.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2025

Random-Order Interval Selection

In the problem of online unweighted interval selection, the objective is to maximize the number of non-conflicting intervals accepted by the algorithm. In the conventional online model of irrevocable decisions, there is an Omega(n) lower bound on the competitive ratio, even for randomized algorithms [Bachmann et al. 2013]. In a line of work that allows for revocable acceptances, [Faigle and Nawijn 1995] gave a greedy 1-competitive (i.e. optimal) algorithm in the real-time model, where intervals arrive in order of non-decreasing starting times. The natural extension of their algorithm in the adversarial (any-order) model is 2k-competitive [Borodin and Karavasilis 2023], when there are at most k different interval lengths, and that is optimal for all deterministic, and memoryless randomized algorithms. We study this problem in the random-order model, where the adversary chooses the instance, but the online sequence is a uniformly random permutation of the items. We consider the same algorithm that is optimal in the cases of the real-time and any-order models, and give an upper bound of 2.5 on the competitive ratio under random-order arrivals. We also initiate a study of utilizing random-order arrivals to extract random bits with the goal of derandomizing algorithms. Besides producing simple algorithms, simulating random bits through random arrivals enhances our understanding of the comparative strength of the two models. Our main extraction process returns a bit with a worst-case bias of 2 - sqrt(2) = 0.585 and operates under the mild assumption that there exist at least two distinct items in the input. We motivate the applicability of this process by using it to simulate a number of barely random algorithms for interval selection (single-length arbitrary weights, and C-benevolent instances), the general knapsack problem, string guessing, minimum makespan, and job throughput scheduling.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2024

Online Bipartite Matching in the Probe-Commit Model

We consider the classical online bipartite matching problem in the probe-commit model. In this problem, when an online vertex arrives, its edges must be probed to determine if they exist, based on known edge probabilities. A probing algorithm must respect commitment, meaning that if a probed edge exists, it must be used in the matching. Additionally, each online vertex has a patience constraint which limits the number of probes that can be made to an online vertex's adjacent edges. We introduce a new configuration linear program (LP) which we prove is a relaxation of an optimal offline probing algorithm. Using this LP, we establish the following competitive ratios which depend on the model used to generate the instance graph, and the arrival order of its online vertices: - In the worst-case instance model, an optimal $1/e$ ratio when the vertices arrive in uniformly at random (u.a.r.) order. - In the known independently distributed (i.d.) instance model, an optimal $1/2$ ratio when the vertices arrive in adversarial order, and a $1-1/e$ ratio when the vertices arrive in u.a.r. order. The latter two results improve upon the previous best competitive ratio of $0.46$ due to Brubach et al. (Algorithmica 2020), which only held in the more restricted known i.i.d. (independent and identically distributed) instance model. Our $1-1/e$-competitive algorithm matches the best known result for the prophet secretary matching problem due to Ehsani et al. (SODA 2018). Our algorithm is efficient and implies a $1-1/e$ approximation ratio for the special case when the graph is known. This is the offline stochastic matching problem, and we improve upon the $0.42$ approximation ratio for one-sided patience due to Pollner et al. (EC 2022), while also generalizing the $1-1/e$ approximation ratio for unbounded patience due to Gamlath et al. (SODA 2019).

cs.DS↗

arXiv2023

Any-Order Online Interval Selection

We consider the problem of online interval scheduling on a single machine, where intervals arrive online in an order chosen by an adversary, and the algorithm must output a set of non-conflicting intervals. Traditionally in scheduling theory, it is assumed that intervals arrive in order of increasing start times. We drop that assumption and allow for intervals to arrive in any possible order. We call this variant any-order interval selection (AOIS). We assume that some online acceptances can be revoked, but a feasible solution must always be maintained. For unweighted intervals and deterministic algorithms, this problem is unbounded. Under the assumption that there are at most $k$ different interval lengths, we give a simple algorithm that achieves a competitive ratio of $2k$ and show that it is optimal amongst deterministic algorithms, and a restricted class of randomized algorithms we call memoryless, contributing to an open question by Adler and Azar 2003; namely whether a randomized algorithm without access to history can achieve a constant competitive ratio. We connect our model to the problem of call control on the line, and show how the algorithms of Garay et al. 1997 can be applied to our setting, resulting in an optimal algorithm for the case of proportional weights. We also discuss the case of intervals with arbitrary weights, and show how to convert the single-length algorithm of Fung et al. 2014 into a classify and randomly select algorithm that achieves a competitive ratio of 2k. Finally, we consider the case of intervals arriving in a random order, and show that for single-lengthed instances, a one-directional algorithm (i.e. replacing intervals in one direction), is the only deterministic memoryless algorithm that can possibly benefit from random arrivals.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2021

Prophet Matching Meets Probing with Commitment

We consider the online stochastic matching problem for bipartite graphs where edges adjacent to an online node must be probed to determine if they exist, based on known edge probabilities. Our algorithms respect commitment, in that if a probed edge exists, it must be used in the matching. We study this matching problem subject to a downward-closed constraint on each online node's allowable edge probes. Our setting generalizes the commonly studied patience (or time-out) constraint which limits the number of probes that can be made to an online node's adjacent edges. We introduce a new LP that we prove is a relaxation of an optimal offline probing algorithm (the adaptive benchmark) and which overcomes the limitations of previous LP relaxations. (1) A tight $\frac{1}{2}$ ratio when the stochastic graph is generated from a known stochastic type graph where the $t^{th}$ online node is drawn independently from a known distribution $\scr{D}_{π(t)}$ and $π$ is chosen adversarially. We refer to this setting as the known i.d. stochastic matching problem with adversarial arrivals. (2) A $1-1/e$ ratio when the stochastic graph is generated from a known stochastic type graph where the $t^{th}$ online node is drawn independently from a known distribution $\scr{D}_{π(t)}$ and $π$ is a random permutation. We refer to this setting as the known i.d. stochastic matching problem with random order arrivals. Our results improve upon the previous best competitive ratio of $0.46$ in the known i.i.d. setting against the standard adaptive benchmark. Moreover, we are the first to study the prophet secretary matching problem in the context of probing, where we match the best known classical result.

cs.DM↗

arXiv2021

Greedy Approaches to Online Stochastic Matching

Within the context of stochastic probing with commitment, we consider the online stochastic matching problem; that is, the one-sided online bipartite matching problem where edges adjacent to an online node must be probed to determine if they exist based on edge probabilities that become known when an online vertex arrives. If a probed edge exists, it must be used in the matching (if possible). We consider the competitiveness of online algorithms in both the adversarial order model (AOM) and the random order model (ROM). More specifically, we consider a bipartite stochastic graph $G = (U,V,E)$ where $U$ is the set of offline vertices, $V$ is the set of online vertices and $G$ has edge probabilities $(p_{e})_{e \in E}$ and edge weights $(w_{e})_{e \in E}$. Additionally, $G$ has probing constraints $(\scr{C}_{v})_{v \in V}$, where $\scr{C}_v$ indicates which sequences of edges adjacent to an online vertex $v$ can be probed. We assume that $U$ is known in advance, and that $\scr{C}_v$, together with the edge probabilities and weights adjacent to an online vertex are only revealed when the online vertex arrives. This model generalizes the various settings of the classical bipartite matching problem, and so our main contribution is in making progress towards understanding which classical results extend to the stochastic probing model.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2021

Bipartite Stochastic Matching: Online, Random Order, and I.I.D. Models

Within the context of stochastic probing with commitment, we consider the online stochastic matching problem; that is, the one sided online bipartite matching problem where edges adjacent to an online node must be probed to determine if they exist, based on known edge probabilities. If a probed edge exists, it must be used in the matching (if possible). We study this problem in the generality of a patience (or budget) constraint which limits the number of probes that can be made to edges adjacent to an online node. The patience constraint results in modelling and computational efficiency issues that are not encountered in the special cases of unit patience and full (i.e., unlimited) patience. The stochastic matching problem leads to a variety of settings. Our main contribution is to provide a new LP relaxation and a unified approach for establishing new and improved competitive bounds in three different input model settings (namely, adversarial, random order, and known i.i.d.). In all these settings, the algorithm does not have any control on the ordering of the online nodes. We establish competitive bounds in these settings, all of which generalize the standard non-stochastic setting when edges do not need to be probed (i.e., exist with certainty). All of our competitive ratios hold for arbitrary edge probabilities and patience constraints: (1) A $1-1/e$ ratio when the stochastic graph is known, offline vertices are weighted and online arrivals are adversarial. (2) A $1-1/e$ ratio when the stochastic graph is known, edges are weighted, and online arrivals are given in random order (i.e., in ROM, the random order model). (3) A $1-1/e$ ratio when online arrivals are drawn i.i.d. from a known stochastic type graph and edges are weighted. (4) A (tight) $1/e$ ratio when the stochastic graph is unknown, edges are weighted and online arrivals are given in random order.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2019

Electronic markets with multiple submodular buyers

We discuss the problem of setting prices in an electronic market that has more than one buyer. We assume that there are self-interested sellers each selling a distinct item that has an associated cost. Each buyer has a submodular valuation for purchasing any subset of items. The goal of the sellers is to set a price for their item such that their profit from possibly selling their item to the buyers is maximized. Our most comprehensive results concern a multi copy setting where each seller has m copies of their item and there are m buyers. In this setting, we give a necessary and sufficient condition for the existence of market clearing pure Nash equilibrium. We also show that not all equilibria are market clearing even when this condition is satisfied contrary to what was shown in the case of a single buyer in [2]. Finally, we investigate the pricing problem for multiple buyers in the limited supply setting when each seller only has a single copy of their item.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2018

An Experimental Study of Algorithms for Online Bipartite Matching

We perform an experimental study of algorithms for online bipartite matching under the known i.i.d. input model with integral types. In the last decade, there has been substantial effort in designing complex algorithms with the goal of improving worst-case approximation ratios. Our goal is to determine how these algorithms perform on more practical instances rather than worst-case instances. In particular, we are interested in whether the ranking of the algorithms by their worst-case performance is consistent with the ranking of the algorithms by their average-case/practical performance. We are also interested in whether preprocessing times and implementation difficulties that are introduced by these algorithms are justified in practice. To that end we evaluate these algorithms on different random inputs as well as real-life instances obtained from publicly available repositories. We compare these algorithms against several simple greedy-style algorithms. Most of the complex algorithms in the literature are presented as being non-greedy (i.e., an algorithm can intentionally skip matching a node that has available neighbors) to simplify the analysis. Every such algorithm can be turned into a greedy one without hurting its worst-case performance. On our benchmarks, non-greedy versions of these algorithms perform much worse than their greedy versions. Greedy versions perform about as well as the simplest greedy algorithm by itself. This, together with our other findings, suggests that simplest greedy algorithms are competitive with the state-of-the-art worst-case algorithms for online bipartite matching on many average-case and practical input families. Greediness is by far the most important property of online algorithms for bipartite matching.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2018

Advice Complexity of Priority Algorithms

The priority model of "greedy-like" algorithms was introduced by Borodin, Nielsen, and Rackoff in 2002. We augment this model by allowing priority algorithms to have access to advice, i.e., side information precomputed by an all-powerful oracle. Obtaining lower bounds in the priority model without advice can be challenging and may involve intricate adversary arguments. Since the priority model with advice is even more powerful, obtaining lower bounds presents additional difficulties. We sidestep these difficulties by developing a general framework of reductions which makes lower bound proofs relatively straightforward and routine. We start by introducing the Pair Matching problem, for which we are able to prove strong lower bounds in the priority model with advice. We develop a template for constructing a reduction from Pair Matching to other problems in the priority model with advice -- this part is technically challenging since the reduction needs to define a valid priority function for Pair Matching while respecting the priority function for the other problem. Finally, we apply the template to obtain lower bounds for a number of standard discrete optimization problems.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2018

Seasonal Goods and Spoiled Milk: Pricing for a Limited Shelf-Life

We examine the case of items with a limited shelf-life where storing an item (before consumption) may carry a cost to a buyer (or distributor). For example, eggs, milk, or Groupon coupons have a fixed expiry date, and seasonal goods can suffer a decrease in value. We show how this setting contrasts with recent results by Berbeglia et al (arXiv:1509.07330(v5)) for items with infinite shelf-life. We prove tight bounds on the seller's profits showing how they relate to the items' shelf-life. We show, counterintuitively, that in our limited shelf-life setting, increasing storage costs can sometimes lead to less profit for the seller which cannot happen when items have unlimited shelf-life. We also provide an algorithm that calculates optimal prices. Finally, we examine empirically the relationship between profits and buyer utility as the storage cost and shelf-life duration change, and observe properties, some of which are unique to the limited shelf-life setting.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2018

Greedy Bipartite Matching in Random Type Poisson Arrival Model

We introduce a new random input model for bipartite matching which we call the Random Type Poisson Arrival Model. Just like in the known i.i.d. model (introduced by Feldman et al. 2009), online nodes have types in our model. In contrast to the adversarial types studied in the known i.i.d. model, following the random graphs studied in Mastin and Jaillet 2016, in our model each type graph is generated randomly by including each offline node in the neighborhood of an online node with probability $c/n$ independently. In our model, nodes of the same type appear consecutively in the input and the number of times each type node appears is distributed according to the Poisson distribution with parameter 1. We analyze the performance of the simple greedy algorithm under this input model. The performance is controlled by the parameter $c$ and we are able to exactly characterize the competitive ratio for the regimes $c = o(1)$ and $c = ω(1)$. We also provide a precise bound on the expected size of the matching in the remaining regime of constant $c$. We compare our results to the previous work of Mastin and Jaillet who analyzed the simple greedy algorithm in the $G_{n,n,p}$ model where each online node type occurs exactly once. We essentially show that the approach of Mastin and Jaillet can be extended to work for the Random Type Poisson Arrival Model, although several nontrivial technical challenges need to be overcome. Intuitively, one can view the Random Type Poisson Arrival Model as the $G_{n,n,p}$ model with less randomness; that is, instead of each online node having a new type, each online node has a chance of repeating the previous type.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2017

A Simple PTAS for the Dual Bin Packing Problem and Advice Complexity of Its Online Version

Recently, Renault (2016) studied the dual bin packing problem in the per-request advice model of online algorithms. He showed that given $O(1/ε)$ advice bits for each input item allows approximating the dual bin packing problem online to within a factor of $1+ε$. Renault asked about the advice complexity of dual bin packing in the tape-advice model of online algorithms. We make progress on this question. Let $s$ be the maximum bit size of an input item weight. We present a conceptually simple online algorithm that with total advice $O\left(\frac{s + \log n}{ε^2}\right)$ approximates the dual bin packing to within a $1+ε$ factor. To this end, we describe and analyze a simple offline PTAS for the dual bin packing problem. Although a PTAS for a more general problem was known prior to our work (Kellerer 1999, Chekuri and Khanna 2006), our PTAS is arguably simpler to state and analyze. As a result, we could easily adapt our PTAS to obtain the advice-complexity result. We also consider whether the dependence on $s$ is necessary in our algorithm. We show that if $s$ is unrestricted then for small enough $ε> 0$ obtaining a $1+ε$ approximation to the dual bin packing requires $Ω_ε(n)$ bits of advice. To establish this lower bound we analyze an online reduction that preserves the advice complexity and approximation ratio from the binary separation problem due to Boyar et al. (2016). We define two natural advice complexity classes that capture the distinction similar to the Turing machine world distinction between pseudo polynomial time algorithms and polynomial time algorithms. Our results on the dual bin packing problem imply the separation of the two classes in the advice complexity world.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2017

On Conceptually Simple Algorithms for Variants of Online Bipartite Matching

We present a series of results regarding conceptually simple algorithms for bipartite matching in various online and related models. We first consider a deterministic adversarial model. The best approximation ratio possible for a one-pass deterministic online algorithm is $1/2$, which is achieved by any greedy algorithm. Dürr et al. recently presented a $2$-pass algorithm called Category-Advice that achieves approximation ratio $3/5$. We extend their algorithm to multiple passes. We prove the exact approximation ratio for the $k$-pass Category-Advice algorithm for all $k \ge 1$, and show that the approximation ratio converges to the inverse of the golden ratio $2/(1+\sqrt{5}) \approx 0.618$ as $k$ goes to infinity. The convergence is extremely fast --- the $5$-pass Category-Advice algorithm is already within $0.01\%$ of the inverse of the golden ratio. We then consider a natural greedy algorithm in the online stochastic IID model---MinDegree. This algorithm is an online version of a well-known and extensively studied offline algorithm MinGreedy. We show that MinDegree cannot achieve an approximation ratio better than $1-1/e$, which is guaranteed by any consistent greedy algorithm in the known IID model. Finally, following the work in Besser and Poloczek, we depart from an adversarial or stochastic ordering and investigate a natural randomized algorithm (MinRanking) in the priority model. Although the priority model allows the algorithm to choose the input ordering in a general but well defined way, this natural algorithm cannot obtain the approximation of the Ranking algorithm in the ROM model.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2016

Max-Sum Diversification, Monotone Submodular Functions and Dynamic Updates

Result diversification is an important aspect in web-based search, document summarization, facility location, portfolio management and other applications. Given a set of ranked results for a set of objects (e.g. web documents, facilities, etc.) with a distance between any pair, the goal is to select a subset $S$ satisfying the following three criteria: (a) the subset $S$ satisfies some constraint (e.g. bounded cardinality); (b) the subset contains results of high "quality"; and (c) the subset contains results that are "diverse" relative to the distance measure. The goal of result diversification is to produce a diversified subset while maintaining high quality as much as possible. We study a broad class of problems where the distances are a metric, where the constraint is given by independence in a matroid, where quality is determined by a monotone submodular function, and diversity is defined as the sum of distances between objects in $S$. Our problem is a generalization of the {\em max sum diversification} problem studied in \cite{GoSh09} which in turn is a generaliztion of the {\em max sum $p$-dispersion problem} studied extensively in location theory. It is NP-hard even with the triangle inequality. We propose two simple and natural algorithms: a greedy algorithm for a cardinality constraint and a local search algorithm for an arbitary matroid constraint. We prove that both algorithms achieve constant approximation ratios.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2016

On the limitations of deterministic de-randomizations for online bipartite matching and max-sat

The surprising results of Karp, Vazirani and Vazirani and (respectively) Buchbinder et al are examples where rather simple randomizations provide provably better approximations than the corresponding deterministic counterparts for online bipartite matching and (respectively) unconstrained non-monotone submodular maximization. We show that seemingly strong extensions of the deterministic online computation model can at best match the performance of naive randomization. More specifically, for bipartite matching, we show that in the priority model (allowing very general ways to order the input stream), we cannot improve upon the trivial 1/2-approximation achieved by any greedy maximal matching algorithm and likewise cannot improve upon this approximation by any log n/log log n number of online algorithms running in parallel. The latter result yields an improved log log n - log log log n lower bound for the number of advice bits needed. For max-sat, we adapt the recent de-randomization approach of Buchbinder and Feldman applied to the Buchbinbder et al algorithm for max-sat to obtain a deterministic 3/4-approximation algorithm using width 2n parallelism. In order to improve upon this approximation, we show that exponential width parallelism of online algorithms is necessary (in a model that is more general than what is needed for the width 2n algorithm).

cs.DS↗