arXiv subjects

Aniket Murhekar

Publications and source records attributed to Aniket Murhekar.

13 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2025

Existence of 2-EFX Allocations of Chores

We study the fair division of indivisible chores among agents with additive disutility functions. We investigate the existence of allocations satisfying the popular fairness notion of envy-freeness up to any chore (EFX), and its multiplicative approximations. The existence of $4$-EFX allocations was recently established by Garg, Murhekar, and Qin (2025). We improve this guarantee by proving the existence of $2$-EFX allocations for all instances with additive disutilities. This approximation was previously known only for restricted instances such as bivalued disutilities (Lin, Wu, and Zhou (2025)) or three agents (Afshinmehr, Ansaripour, Danaei, and Mehlhorn (2024)). We obtain our result by providing a general framework for achieving approximate-EFX allocations. The approach begins with a suitable initial allocation and performs a sequence of local swaps between the bundles of envious and envied agents. For our main result, we begin with an initial allocation that satisfies envy-freeness up to one chore (EF1) and Pareto-optimality (PO); the existence of such an allocation was recently established in a major breakthrough by Mahara (2025). We further demonstrate the strength and generality of our framework by giving simple and unified proofs of existing results, namely (i) $2$-EFX for bivalued instances, (ii) 2-EFX for three agents, (iii) EFX when the number of chores is at most twice the number of agents, and (iv) $4$-EFX for all instances. We expect this framework to have broader applications in approximate-EFX due to its simplicity and generality.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2024

On the Theoretical Foundations of Data Exchange Economies

The immense success of ML systems relies heavily on large-scale, high-quality data. The high demand for data has led to many paradigms that involve selling, exchanging, and sharing data, motivating the study of economic processes with data as an asset. However, data differs from classical economic assets in terms of free duplication: there is no concept of limited supply since it can be replicated at zero marginal cost. This distinction introduces fundamental differences between economic processes involving data and those concerning other assets. We study a parallel to exchange (Arrow-Debreu) markets where data is the asset. Here, agents with datasets exchange data fairly and voluntarily, aiming for mutual benefit without monetary compensation. This framework is particularly relevant for non-profit organizations that seek to improve their ML models through data exchange, yet are restricted from selling their data for profit. We propose a general framework for data exchange, built on two core principles: (i) fairness, ensuring that each agent receives utility proportional to their contribution to others; contributions are quantifiable using standard credit-sharing functions like the Shapley value, and (ii) stability, ensuring that no coalition of agents can identify an exchange among themselves which they unanimously prefer to the current exchange. We show that fair and stable exchanges exist for all monotone continuous utility functions. Next, we investigate the computational complexity of finding approximate fair and stable exchanges. We present a local search algorithm for instances with monotone submodular utility functions, where each agent contributions are measured using the Shapley value. We prove that this problem lies in CLS under mild assumptions. Our framework opens up several intriguing theoretical directions for research in data economics.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2024

Constant-Factor EFX Exists for Chores

We study the problem of fair allocation of chores to agents with additive preferences. In the discrete setting, envy-freeness up to any chore (EFX) has emerged as a compelling fairness criterion. However, establishing its (non-)existence or achieving a meaningful approximation remains a major open question. The current best guarantee is the existence of $O(n^2)$-EFX allocations for $n$ agents, obtained through a sophisticated algorithm (Zhou and Wu, 2022). In this paper, we show the existence of $4$-EFX allocations, providing the first constant-factor approximation of EFX. We also investigate the existence of allocations that are both fair and efficient, using Pareto optimality (PO) as our efficiency criterion. For the special case of bivalued instances, we establish the existence of allocations that are both $3$-EFX and PO, thus improving the current best factor of $O(n)$-EFX without any efficiency guarantees. For general additive instances, the existence of allocations that are $α$-EF$k$ and PO has remained open for any constant values of $α$ and $k$, where EF$k$ denotes envy-freeness up to $k$ chores. We provide the first positive result in this direction by showing the existence of allocations that are $2$-EF$2$ and PO. Our results are obtained via a novel economic framework called earning restricted (ER) competitive equilibrium for fractional allocations, which limits agents' earnings from each chore. We show the existence of ER equilibria by formulating it as an linear complementarity problem (LCP) and proving that the classic complementary pivot algorithm on the LCP terminates at an ER equilibrium. We design algorithms that carefully round fractional ER equilibria, and perform bundle swaps and merges to meet the desired fairness and efficiency criteria. We expect that the concept of ER equilibrium will be useful in deriving further results on related problems.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2024

Weighted EF1 and PO Allocations with Few Types of Agents or Chores

We investigate the existence of fair and efficient allocations of indivisible chores to asymmetric agents who have unequal entitlements or weights. We consider the fairness notion of weighted envy-freeness up to one chore (wEF1) and the efficiency notion of Pareto-optimality (PO). The existence of EF1 and PO allocations of chores to symmetric agents is a major open problem in discrete fair division, and positive results are known only for certain structured instances. In this paper, we study this problem for a more general setting of asymmetric agents and show that an allocation that is wEF1 and PO exists and can be computed in polynomial time for instances with: - Three types of agents, where agents with the same type have identical preferences but can have different weights. - Two types of chores, where the chores can be partitioned into two sets, each containing copies of the same chore. For symmetric agents, our results establish that EF1 and PO allocations exist for three types of agents and also generalize known results for three agents, two types of agents, and two types of chores. Our algorithms use a weighted picking sequence algorithm as a subroutine; we expect this idea and our analysis to be of independent interest.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2023

Computing Pareto-Optimal and Almost Envy-Free Allocations of Indivisible Goods

We study the problem of fair and efficient allocation of a set of indivisible goods to agents with additive valuations using the popular fairness notions of envy-freeness up to one good (EF1) and equitability up to one good (EQ1) in conjunction with Pareto-optimality (PO). There exists a pseudo-polynomial time algorithm to compute an EF1+PO allocation and a non-constructive proof of the existence of allocations that are both EF1 and fractionally Pareto-optimal (fPO), which is a stronger notion than PO. We present a pseudo-polynomial time algorithm to compute an EF1+fPO allocation, thereby improving the earlier results. Our techniques also enable us to show that an EQ1+fPO allocation always exists when the values are positive and that it can be computed in pseudo-polynomial time. We also consider the class of $k$-ary instances where $k$ is a constant, i.e., each agent has at most $k$ different values for the goods. For such instances, we show that an EF1+fPO allocation can be computed in strongly polynomial time. When all values are positive, we show that an EQ1+fPO allocation for such instances can be computed in strongly polynomial time. Next, we consider instances where the number of agents is constant and show that an EF1+PO (likewise, an EQ1+PO) allocation can be computed in polynomial time. These results significantly extend the polynomial-time computability beyond the known cases of binary or identical valuations. We also design a polynomial-time algorithm that computes a Nash welfare maximizing allocation when there are constantly many agents with constant many different values for the goods. Finally, on the complexity side, we show that the problem of computing an EF1+fPO allocation lies in the complexity class PLS.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2023

New Algorithms for the Fair and Efficient Allocation of Indivisible Chores

We study the problem of fairly and efficiently allocating indivisible chores among agents with additive disutility functions. We consider the widely-used envy-based fairness properties of EF1 and EFX, in conjunction with the efficiency property of fractional Pareto-optimality (fPO). Existence (and computation) of an allocation that is simultaneously EF1/EFX and fPO are challenging open problems, and we make progress on both of them. We show existence of an allocation that is - EF1+fPO, when there are three agents, - EF1+fPO, when there are at most two disutility functions, - EFX+fPO, for three agents with bivalued disutilities. These results are constructive, based on strongly polynomial-time algorithms. We also investigate non-existence and show that an allocation that is EFX+fPO need not exist, even for two agents.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2023

Nash Equilibria of Two-Player Matrix Games Repeated Until Collision

We introduce and initiate the study of a natural class of repeated two-player matrix games, called Repeated-Until-Collision (RUC) games. In each round, both players simultaneously pick an action from a common action set $\{1, 2, \dots, n\}$. Depending on their chosen actions, they derive payoffs given by $n \times n$ matrices $A$ and $B$, respectively. If their actions collide (i.e., they pick the same action), the game ends, otherwise, it proceeds to the next round. Both players want to maximize their total payoff until the game ends. RUC games can be interpreted as pursuit-evasion games or repeated hide-and-seek games. They also generalize hand cricket, a popular game among children in India. We show that under mild assumptions on the payoff matrices, every RUC game admits a Nash equilibrium (NE). Moreover, we show the existence of a stationary NE, where each player chooses their action according to a probability distribution over the action set that does not change across rounds. Remarkably, we show that all NE are effectively the same as the stationary NE, thus showing that RUC games admit an almost unique NE. Lastly, we also show how to compute (approximate) NE for RUC games.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2023

Dynamic Vector Bin Packing for Online Resource Allocation in the Cloud

Several cloud-based applications, such as cloud gaming, rent servers to execute jobs which arrive in an online fashion. Each job has a resource demand and must be dispatched to a cloud server which has enough resources to execute the job, which departs after its completion. Under the `pay-as-you-go' billing model, the server rental cost is proportional to the total time that servers are actively running jobs. The problem of efficiently allocating a sequence of online jobs to servers without exceeding the resource capacity of any server while minimizing total server usage time can be modelled as a variant of the dynamic bin packing problem (DBP), called MinUsageTime DBP. In this work, we initiate the study of the problem with multi-dimensional resource demands (e.g. CPU/GPU usage, memory requirement, bandwidth usage, etc.), called MinUsageTime Dynamic Vector Bin Packing (DVBP). We study the competitive ratio (CR) of Any Fit packing algorithms for this problem. We show almost-tight bounds on the CR of three specific Any Fit packing algorithms, namely First Fit, Next Fit, and Move To Front. We prove that the CR of Move To Front is at most $(2μ+1)d +1$, where $μ$ is the ratio of the max/min item durations. For $d=1$, this significantly improves the previously known upper bound of $6μ+7$ (Kamali & Lopez-Ortiz, 2015). We then prove the CR of First Fit and Next Fit are bounded by $(μ+2)d+1$ and $2μd+1$, respectively. Next, we prove a lower bound of $(μ+1)d$ on the CR of any Any Fit packing algorithm, an improved lower bound of $2μd$ for Next Fit, and a lower bound of $2μ$ for Move To Front in the 1-D case. All our bounds improve or match the best-known bounds for the 1-D case. Finally, we experimentally study the average-case performance of these algorithms on randomly generated synthetic data, and observe that Move To Front outperforms other Any Fit packing algorithms.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2022

Tractable Fragments of the Maximum Nash Welfare Problem

We study the problem of maximizing Nash welfare (MNW) while allocating indivisible goods to asymmetric agents. The Nash welfare of an allocation is the weighted geometric mean of agents' utilities, and the allocation with maximum Nash welfare is known to satisfy several desirable fairness and efficiency properties. However, computing such an MNW allocation is NP-hard, even for two agents with identical, additive valuations. Hence, we aim to identify tractable classes that either admit a PTAS, an FPTAS, or an exact polynomial-time algorithm. To this end, we design a PTAS for finding an MNW allocation for the case of asymmetric agents with identical, additive valuations, thus generalizing a similar result for symmetric agents. Our techniques can also be adapted to give a PTAS for the problem of computing the optimal $p$-mean welfare. We also show that an MNW allocation can be computed exactly in polynomial time for identical agents with $k$-ary valuations when $k$ is a constant, where every agent has at most $k$ different values for the goods. Next, we consider the special case where every agent finds at most two goods valuable, and show that this class admits an efficient algorithm, even for general monotone valuations. In contrast, we note that when agents can value three or more goods, maximizing Nash welfare is NP-hard, even when agents are symmetric and have additive valuations, showing our algorithmic result is essentially tight. Finally, we show that for constantly many asymmetric agents with additive valuations, the MNW problem admits an FPTAS.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2022

(Almost) Envy-Free, Proportional and Efficient Allocations of an Indivisible Mixed Manna

We study the problem of finding fair and efficient allocations of a set of indivisible items to a set of agents, where each item may be a good (positively valued) for some agents and a bad (negatively valued) for others, i.e., a mixed manna. As fairness notions, we consider arguably the strongest possible relaxations of envy-freeness and proportionality, namely envy-free up to any item (EFX and EFX$_0$), and proportional up to the maximin good or any bad (PropMX and PropMX$_0$). Our efficiency notion is Pareto-optimality (PO). We study two types of instances: (i) Separable, where the item set can be partitioned into goods and bads, and (ii) Restricted mixed goods (RMG), where for each item $j$, every agent has either a non-positive value for $j$, or values $j$ at the same $v_j>0$. We obtain polynomial-time algorithms for the following: (i) Separable instances: PropMX$_0$ allocation. (ii) RMG instances: Let pure bads be the set of items that everyone values negatively. - PropMX allocation for general pure bads. - EFX+PropMX allocation for identically-ordered pure bads. - EFX+PropMX+PO allocation for identical pure bads. Finally, if the RMG instances are further restricted to binary mixed goods where all the $v_j$'s are the same, we strengthen the results to guarantee EFX$_0$ and PropMX$_0$ respectively.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2021

Fair and Efficient Allocations of Chores under Bivalued Preferences

We study the problem of fair and efficient allocation of a set of indivisible chores to agents with additive cost functions. We consider the popular fairness notion of envy-freeness up to one good (EF1) with the efficiency notion of Pareto-optimality (PO). While it is known that an EF1+PO allocation exists and can be computed in pseudo-polynomial time in the case of goods, the same problem is open for chores. Our first result is a strongly polynomial-time algorithm for computing an EF1+PO allocation for bivalued instances, where agents have (at most) two disutility values for the chores. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first non-trivial class of indivisible chores to admit an EF1+PO allocation and an efficient algorithm for its computation. We also study the problem of computing an envy-free (EF) and PO allocation for the case of divisible chores. While the existence of an EF+PO allocation is known via competitive equilibrium with equal incomes, its efficient computation is open. Our second result shows that for bivalued instances, an EF+PO allocation can be computed in strongly polynomial-time.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2021

On Fair and Efficient Allocations of Indivisible Public Goods

We study fair allocation of indivisible public goods subject to cardinality (budget) constraints. In this model, we have n agents and m available public goods, and we want to select $k \leq m$ goods in a fair and efficient manner. We first establish fundamental connections between the models of private goods, public goods, and public decision making by presenting polynomial-time reductions for the popular solution concepts of maximum Nash welfare (MNW) and leximin. These mechanisms are known to provide remarkable fairness and efficiency guarantees in private goods and public decision making settings. We show that they retain these desirable properties even in the public goods case. We prove that MNW allocations provide fairness guarantees of Proportionality up to one good (Prop1), $1/n$ approximation to Round Robin Share (RRS), and the efficiency guarantee of Pareto Optimality (PO). Further, we show that the problems of finding MNW or leximin-optimal allocations are NP-hard, even in the case of constantly many agents, or binary valuations. This is in sharp contrast to the private goods setting that admits polynomial-time algorithms under binary valuations. We also design pseudo-polynomial time algorithms for computing an exact MNW or leximin-optimal allocation for the cases of (i) constantly many agents, and (ii) constantly many goods with additive valuations. We also present an O(n)-factor approximation algorithm for MNW which also satisfies RRS, Prop1, and 1/2-Prop.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2017

Automated Recurrence Analysis for Almost-Linear Expected-Runtime Bounds

We consider the problem of developing automated techniques for solving recurrence relations to aid the expected-runtime analysis of programs. Several classical textbook algorithms have quite efficient expected-runtime complexity, whereas the corresponding worst-case bounds are either inefficient (e.g., QUICK-SORT), or completely ineffective (e.g., COUPON-COLLECTOR). Since the main focus of expected-runtime analysis is to obtain efficient bounds, we consider bounds that are either logarithmic, linear, or almost-linear ($\mathcal{O}(\log n)$, $\mathcal{O}(n)$, $\mathcal{O}(n\cdot\log n)$, respectively, where n represents the input size). Our main contribution is an efficient (simple linear-time algorithm) sound approach for deriving such expected-runtime bounds for the analysis of recurrence relations induced by randomized algorithms. Our approach can infer the asymptotically optimal expected-runtime bounds for recurrences of classical randomized algorithms, including RANDOMIZED-SEARCH, QUICK-SORT, QUICK-SELECT, COUPONCOLLECTOR, where the worst-case bounds are either inefficient (such as linear as compared to logarithmic of expected-runtime, or quadratic as compared to linear or almost-linear of expected-runtime), or ineffective. We have implemented our approach, and the experimental results show that we obtain the bounds efficiently for the recurrences of various classical algorithms.

cs.PL↗