arXiv subjects

Boris Gamazaychikov

Publications and source records attributed to Boris Gamazaychikov.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Lights, Camera, Carbon: Architectural Scaling Laws for Video Generation Energy Consumption

We present a bidirectional framework for estimating the energy consumption of text-to-video (T2V) and text-to-video-audio (T2VA) models from architectural first principles and observable generation parameters such as resolution and duration, requiring no access to weights, model size, or implementation details. Forward, it predicts energy from generation parameters and architectural principles; backward, it recovers architectural scaling behavior from observed inference times, with accuracy serving as a criterion for architectural validity. Building on the established compute-bound nature of video diffusion models, we demonstrate that each model's energy profile obeys theoretically derived scaling laws, decomposing into quadratic and linear terms whose coefficients directly reflect the underlying architectural complexity. Validated across six open-source models spanning 8.3B-27B parameters and three GPU configurations, this decomposition achieves below 3% MAPE across all architectures. This approach offers a standardized, empirically and theoretically grounded framework for sustainability benchmarking across T2V models and architectures.

cs.MM↗

arXiv2026

The Global Landscape of Environmental AI Regulation: From the Cost of Reasoning to a Right to Green AI

Artificial intelligence (AI) systems impose substantial and growing environmental costs, yet transparency about these impacts has declined even as their deployment has accelerated. This paper makes three contributions. First, we collate empirical evidence that generative Web search and reasoning models - which have proliferated in 2025 - come with much higher cumulative environmental impacts than previous generations of AI approaches. Second, we map the global regulatory landscape across eleven jurisdictions and find that the manner in which environmental governance operates (predominantly at the facility-level rather than the model-level, with a focus on training rather than inference, with limited AI-specific energy disclosure requirements outside the EU) limits its applicability. Third, to address this, we propose a three-pronged policy response: mandatory model-level transparency that covers inference consumption, benchmarks, and compute locations; user rights to opt out of unnecessary generative AI integration and to select environmentally optimized models; and international coordination to prevent regulatory arbitrage. We conclude with concrete legislative proposals - including amendments to the EU AI Act, Consumer Rights Directive, and Digital Services Act - that could serve as templates for other jurisdictions.

cs.CY↗

arXiv2026

Balancing Sustainability And Performance: The Role Of Small-Scale LLMs In Agentic Artificial Intelligence Systems

As large language models become integral to agentic artificial intelligence systems, their energy demands during inference may pose significant sustainability challenges. This study investigates whether deploying smaller-scale language models can reduce energy consumption without compromising responsiveness and output quality in a multi-agent, real-world environments. We conduct a comparative analysis across language models of varying scales to quantify trade-offs between efficiency and performance. Results show that smaller open-weights models can lower energy usage while preserving task quality. Building on these findings, we propose practical guidelines for sustainable artificial intelligence design, including optimal batch size configuration and computation resource allocation. These insights offer actionable strategies for developing scalable, environmentally responsible artificial intelligence systems.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2025

Misinformation by Omission: The Need for More Environmental Transparency in AI

In recent years, Artificial Intelligence (AI) models have grown in size and complexity, driving greater demand for computational power and natural resources. In parallel to this trend, transparency around the costs and impacts of these models has decreased, meaning that the users of these technologies have little to no information about their resource demands and subsequent impacts on the environment. Despite this dearth of adequate data, escalating demand for figures quantifying AI's environmental impacts has led to numerous instances of misinformation evolving from inaccurate or de-contextualized best-effort estimates of greenhouse gas emissions. In this article, we explore pervasive myths and misconceptions shaping public understanding of AI's environmental impacts, tracing their origins and their spread in both the media and scientific publications. We discuss the importance of data transparency in clarifying misconceptions and mitigating these harms, and conclude with a set of recommendations for how AI developers and policymakers can leverage this information to mitigate negative impacts in the future.

cs.CY↗